Re: GNOME Logo Licensing

2017-03-13 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 12:43 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 00:52:25 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > > There has been many instances of us protecting our brand by asking > > people to > > stop using our logo for commercial purposes, CC-BY-SA/LGPLv3 does > > grant > > precisely

Re: GNOME Logo Licensing

2017-03-13 Thread Allan Day
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: ... > That was what I would have said, if Simon didn't put it so eloquently. > So +1 for a permissive license for the artwork itself, we can control > its usage through the GNOME trademark. > Thanks for the contributions

Re: GNOME Logo Licensing

2017-03-13 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 00:52:25 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > There has been many instances of us protecting our brand by asking people to > stop using our logo for commercial purposes, CC-BY-SA/LGPLv3 does grant > precisely the right to use it commercially. There are two things a third party

GNOME 3.23.92 tarballs due today

2017-03-13 Thread Javier Jardón
Hi module maintainers, Friendly reminder about the 3.23.92 tarballs: we need them today (if possible) Cheers, Javier ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

GNOME hackers (developers) group on Telegram

2017-03-13 Thread Olav Vitters
Hello, Since last GUADEC we've created a hidden GNOME hackers group on Telegram. The members are people going to GNOME hackfests, GUADEC, etc. Telegram is NOT free software (IIRC) and its encryption is iffy at best. If you'd like to be added and you fit above description please send an email to