On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 12:43 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 00:52:25 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > There has been many instances of us protecting our brand by asking
> > people to
> > stop using our logo for commercial purposes, CC-BY-SA/LGPLv3 does
> > grant
> > precisely
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
...
> That was what I would have said, if Simon didn't put it so eloquently.
> So +1 for a permissive license for the artwork itself, we can control
> its usage through the GNOME trademark.
>
Thanks for the contributions
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 00:52:25 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> There has been many instances of us protecting our brand by asking people to
> stop using our logo for commercial purposes, CC-BY-SA/LGPLv3 does grant
> precisely the right to use it commercially.
There are two things a third party
Hi module maintainers,
Friendly reminder about the 3.23.92 tarballs: we need them today (if possible)
Cheers,
Javier
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hello,
Since last GUADEC we've created a hidden GNOME hackers group on
Telegram. The members are people going to GNOME hackfests, GUADEC, etc.
Telegram is NOT free software (IIRC) and its encryption is iffy at best.
If you'd like to be added and you fit above description please send an
email to