Re: smproxy/save.c

is just so pre-xsmp applications can work with gnome-session. My thoughts are that those applications aren't integrated with the desktop in so many other ways that spending time so that they can restore their state on login doesn't really seem useful. --Ray Strode

Re: gnome terminal displaying utf-8 unicode text

to align columns right 3) getting line editing to work (e.g., shells) 4) getting programs like vi to work 1 and 2 are going to be a lot easier than 4. I'm not really sure how hard 3 would be. --Ray Strode ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop

Re: Gnome Session Services Framework

Hi Rodrigo, ok, attached patch, with the services framework disabled by default. You can't just disable the session management stuff. The right approach will be to load service manager stuff first, then load the session. Also, if something was started by the service manager then it shouldn't

Re: Gnome Session Services Framework

Hi, this is the only thing missing in my patch (which only includes changes in existing files, the new files, are the same version as in my previous patch). I guess I would just need to go over the client_list in Session. But, the problem I see is how to check we really don't want to start

Re: Gnome Session Services Framework

Hi, Updated patch attached So a few comments... You shoulnd't start the session until all the services are done loading. You shouldn't need the is_done function. Instead connect to the startup-complete signal of the service manager object. gnome-keyring-daemon isn't actually a good fit for

Re: Gnome Session Services Framework

Hi, What it means right now, according to the code, is that a service isn't started until its dependency reaches the running state. But when does a service reach the running state? As soon as it has been spawned? As soon as possible after its shared libraries has been

Re: Fish in GNOME Panel

Hi, Oh cruel, cruel world... Luis (who just this weekend fondly reminisced about the days when wanda would appear completely at random) Wanda is always a just a short command away: type Alt-F2 and then free the fish and then press enter --Ray ___

Re: The future of session management in GNOME

-programs? Of course we'll want to throw away the gnome-session codebase completely. (If you disagree, please go read the code.) The best bet would probably be to rewrite it in C#. I'm kidding. I'M KIDDING! The msm module that Havoc started several years ago and Ray Strode continued hacking on a bit

Re: Bacon, Bonobo, Sockets and Strangeness

Hi, How is it, that a factory which is not the original server of the socket can be responsible for holding a socket open after the parent has been killed? Are you leaking the fd to the child process when you fork? look in /proc/PID-OF-CHILD/fd and see if you have an open reference to the

Re: Network problems in gnome-session

Hi, The bug is basically as follows: after switching network connections via NetworkManager (maybe in combination with hibernate/resume, I'm not sure about that yet), suddenly every window takes about 10 seconds to open while waiting for gnome-session to respond. I've done various ltraces

Re: Network problems in gnome-session

Hi, My current nameserver is 129.xxx.xxx.xxx, and 129.* is the only active network and route. gnome-session still tries to ask 192.168.1.3, though, which was the previously active nameserver from my home network. Do you have nscd running? If you do nscd -i hosts as root after switching

Re: Network problems in gnome-session

Hi, So, do you think that it's a configuration problem on my side or actually a bug in gnome-session? I still think it's the latter. I don't really know what's going on, but I'm guessing it's either a bug in the NetworkManager backend for your distro, or a bug in libc. I have these vague

Re: RFC: hiding the new timezone feature in the clock applet for 2.20

Hi, Since I didn't have time to fix a few things for the clock applet for 2.20, and I don't think anybody did it either, I think this feature is not ready to be used by all our users for 2.20: the UI is clearly far from being optimal, and it's also a bit slow for reasons I've not

Re: cleaning up keyrings

Hi, Even though the keyring is locked, it seems like the application that set the secret should be able to retrieve it. I don't know how you want to make sure it's the same calling application, there might be some tricks in that. But this would reduce the number of login / access the keyring

Re: cleaning up keyrings

Hi, On 8/29/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you asking for an unencrypted area that only one application has read access to? If so, you might be able to do something like that with SELinux (or AppArmor?), but I don't think it would be a very robust solution. The Linux kernel

Fwd: Fwd: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or no commit for you

Hi, Daniel took care of his (libxml, libxslt, gamin) --Ray -- Forwarded message -- From: Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sep 4, 2007 4:25 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or no commit for you To: Ray Strode [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07

Re: Debian-specific patches for the GNOME packages

Hi, X-RedHat stuff doesn't harm, but it might make sense to remove them upstream and have Fedora add them back. Don't know. Pretty sure we don't depend on X-RedHat-Base et al anymore, so we wouldn't need to add them back. --Ray ___ desktop-devel-list

Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24?

Hi, On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008, à 09:39 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : Hi: I asked this earlier, but I might have missed the response. Have the accessibility issues been resolved with the new GDM? In particular,

Re: Generating .gitignore files

Hi, Based on an idea from halfline, I hacked a few lines to automatically generate .gitignore from Makefile.am.  It grew to a couple hundred lines, and is available from pango/git.mk.  http://git.gnome.org/cgit/pango/tree/git.mk It generates perfect .gitignore files for pango, vte,

Re: Searching for patches in bugzilla

Hi, On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Kjartan Maraaskmar...@broadpark.no wrote: ti., 01.09.2009 kl. 16.14 -0400, skrev Owen Taylor: Finding patches in your component that haven't been reviewed is a pretty common operation. Our previous ways of doing it (emblems, links from browse.cgi) aren't

gnome-session branched

Hi, I've created a gnome-2-32 branch for gnome-session in order to make gtk3 build fixes on master. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630277 For more details. --Ray ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

GNOME 3 external dependency proposal (accounts service)

Hi guys, Right now gnome-shell uses a cut-and-paste version of some code from GDM for showing its user switch applet (and also its login dialog). That code isn't very GDM specific, and really belongs in a library. At this point, it's basically a thin caching layer around the accounts service and

Re: about me (was: Re: GNOME 3 external dependency proposal (accounts service))

Hi, While we are on it: Is there a cental place in GNOME3 to get basic user information (like prefered E-Mail or things like that). It is annoying when you have to configure a couple of applications with data that's already there. I really don't want to depend on evolution-data-server for

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, (speaking as one of the 3 maintainers of GDM) On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: - The GDM greeter is slow due to it loading the GNOME session, the example GTK+ LightDM greeter is very lightweight (so is comparable to the speed of the old GDM

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le vendredi 22 octobre 2010 à 01:17 -0400, Ray Strode a écrit : Using GNOME session / g-s-d /etc  is one of GDMs main features.  The point is for there to be consistent experience on the login screen

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote: I agree that GDM's deep integration with GNOME is one of its great features.  GDM is clearly the login manager of choice if you want a very consistent experience between the login manager and the GNOME desktop.

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: While I appreciate the use of a full session for the greeter has it's advantages, I'm not sure they're all necessary for the limited GUI required in a greeter. It's not necessary (i mean there's a lot of prior

Re: GTK+ modules loading changes

Hi, Finally, if you require 2 modules to be loaded in a certain order, you'll need to define the X-GTK-Module-Name as module1:module2. This is the case for the a11y modules. Any reason the list separator isn't a ';' ? That's the typical separator in key files (or less commonly , which was

Re: GNOME 3.0 Release Candidate (2.91.92) Released!

Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: GNOME 3.0 Release Candidate (2.91.92) = 3.0 is now around the corner, and this release candidate has it all already, everyone has been working really hard those last days to make

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, (speaking again as one of the three GDM maintainers) On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: Why replace GDM? - LightDM is a cross-platform solution. What platforms does LightDM support that GDM doesn't? Are they platforms GNOME is targetting? Not

Re: Difficulties getting patch reviewed

Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Having not heard anything, I emailed the maintainer on March 8th, politely asking for a review - no response. Best bet is to ping marnanel on irc. --Ray ___ desktop-devel-list

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: Note that LightDM is not lighter in features, but in architecture. And a different focus, right? GDM is firmly a GNOME project, designed to integrate and work well with GNOME.  LightDM is designed with the idea

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote: Yes, you are right.  GDM does not currently use OpenGL. My comment was meant to be understood as an example of how GDM may be moving in a direction that requires certain hardware or only works on certain

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Hi, On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote: Your report missed the following bug, which is a better example of some of the more serious issues Canonical had working with upstream GDM:  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587750 As you can see in

Re: 3.2 features: login screen

Hi, On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote: Most of the discussion does not seem to be about the login screen as the subject line suggests.  I think this is because the original email in this thread lumped together GDM shell-style greeter topics with

Re: Login Process on Gnome

Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Leonel Florin Selles leonel06...@cfg.jovenclub.cu wrote: I'm working in a school, in which I have the list of students that visit the computer lab, the list of users is in a database along with their alleged passwords. I need to create a login for Gonome

Re: RFC: Securing maintainer uploads to master.gnome.org

Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: 3. Access is determined using doap files 4. If you're not in the doap file of that module, you cannot upload It's pretty common for people not listed as maintainers in the doap files to do releases, especially for the

Re: RFC: Securing maintainer uploads to master.gnome.org

Hi, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:23:25PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote: It's useful. What do you suggest then? 1. Let anyone with git.gnome.org upload any tarball they want This one ^^ 2. Let selected people upload any

Re: RFC: Securing maintainer uploads to master.gnome.org

Hi, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote: Locking stuff down means reducing the attack surface (eg getting rid of shell accounts) and who can write stuff to trusted repositories. It doesn't mean contorting the release process. You just need to have the

Re: Last GNOME 3.4 Blocker Report

Hi, === GDM === [PATCH] add automatic multi seat support https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655380 I plan on looking at this one before doing the release --Ray ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Cairo / Highlighting

Hey, On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Sebastian Geiger sbas...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, given cairo type cr which contains an icon. How can I produce some kind of highlighting on this icon. For example light it up a little and change the background (the parts which are transparent) to a different

Re: Reviewed-By: and pastebins

Hi, On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: In this scenario, I don't want to lose the critical information that the patch has been reviewed (and who reviewed it).  So here's the proposal: I think when the person who reviewed a patch is critical information,

Re: 3.6 Feature: Lock Screen

Hi, On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Lionel proposes to consider merging the login screen and the lock screen as both are about logging in. In the end Allan wrote let's continue some place else. Did this conversation continue somewhere, and what were the

Re: 3.6 Feature: Lock Screen

Hi, On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: I believe the point Lionel made was not about technicalities but about the design by itself, e.g. why would the process of logging in be different in the morning when you turn your computer on than in the afternoon

live image

Hey, I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso You can write the image to a usb stick with this command: sudo dd if=GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso of=/dev/DRIVE bs=8M conv=fsync (where DRIVE is a usb stick,

Re: live image

Hey, again, On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote: I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso I forgot to announce I put up one for 3.5.2: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc

Re: libxml2 commit 65c7d3b2e6506283eecd19a23dcf0122fbcdac33

Hi, On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: mistake done circa 98-99 IIRC and a bit late to fix ... The problem are that those buffers were using int instead of size_t for various size leading to a variety of troubles including security ones. How to fix that

Re: libxml2 commit 65c7d3b2e6506283eecd19a23dcf0122fbcdac33

Hey, On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: that's basically what I did in xmlBuf . But I broke the ABI more frankly by making the xmlBuf private, as I prefer to have the code fixed when people recompile. Those buffers were not supposed to be accessed

Re: GNOME 3.5.91 second beta release

Hi, On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org wrote: More details about changes and news for this beta are available here: core: http://download.gnome.org/core/3.5/3.5.91/NEWS apps: http://download.gnome.org/apps/3.5/3.5.91/NEWS The GNOME 3.5.91 release itself

Re: Questions (about CJK input) on GNOME 3.6 live image

Hey, On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com wrote: The live image is downloaded from: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso I've pushed a new iso to fix this: Firstly, according to rpm -qa | grep ibus and Input Sources tab, there is no

Re: Cangjie and Quick input method missing in Live CD

Hi, On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Shu Hung (Koala) koa...@gmail.com wrote: I've just tried the Gnome 3.6 Live CD (downloaded today): http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso In System Settings Region Language Input Sources, Cangjie (ibus-table-cangjie) and Quick

Re: Cangjie and Quick input method missing in Live CD

Hi, The respun ISO added the new requested ibus subpackages to the manifest and hid the ibus config panels launchers from the apps view. --Ray On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Ray, On 09/10/12 02:03, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, On Mon, Oct 8, 2012

Re: Preserved Window Placement

Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote: It's supposed to be a property of the X session management, including automatically restarting applications that were running before (which Gnome doesn't bother to do). This is usually managed by a mix of the

Re: Blocker bug review for 3.8

Hi, On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Dropping the simple greeter from gdm breaks feature freeze. Removing a feature is even more disruptive than adding a feature so I thought it was understood that we shouldn't be doing these changes after feature freeze

Re: 3.12 feature: Completing the Wayland port

Hi, On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I'll make the start for discussing 3.12 features by giving an update on the status of the Wayland port, and what work remains to be done next cycle. - finish the gdm support I started on this last cycle but

Re: Gnome.org's crypto infrastructure

Hi, * GNOME releases tarballs of source code. Maintainers regularly post checksums of their tarballs along with their announcement emails. Until now, I'm not sure if we have had the need to *guarantee* that a particular release of code is authentic. For example, we don't actually

Re: Gnome.org's crypto infrastructure

Hi, I think the opposite is true as well, in that some software needs other frameworks in place to do distcheck rather than check -- for instance colord needs a running colord daemon to test against. Other software needs X. Well, maybe it could do it in a gnome-continuous VM or something like

Re: Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hi, I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together. I'm leaning toward getting rid of it in 3.16 (versus say 3.18). Distros, of course, could ship a patch to reverse to removal if necessary, so I don't think doing it for 3.16

Re: Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: Having a configure option would not mean it is suddenly gone (if they miss this email, they'd also not know about the patch), but it clearly tells them it'll be gone. Okay so there's a pretty good middle ground we can

Re: Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hi, On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: Can't we hide it behind a --this-is-going-away-in-3.18 configure switch? That was certainly a possibility, but, what's the advantage of doing it? The bug Antoine pointed to shows that distros that use ConsoleKit in 3.14

Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hey, I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together. I know there's LoginKit, systemd-shim and systembsd now that try to provide logind compatible interfaces for non-systemd systems, so I'd really like to get rid of the ConsoleKit code in

Re: Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hi again, Okay so there's a pretty good middle ground we can come up with here. I'll leave the --with-console-kit argument in configure, but if it gets used, then I'll error out and point to the wiki page mclasen suggests in another message. So I started a wiki page here:

Re: Anyone going to be using ConsoleKit for 3.16 ?

Hey, Just to follow up here... On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote: I'll excise the code of ConsoleKit and provide the reversion patches before 3.15.91. I'm holding off for now since a bunch of changes went in for 3.15.90 and I want to make sure that things

Re: How do you hack on GNOME? How can we do better?

Hi, On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: We can classify hacking on GNOME (taken very widely) into the following: 1) Hacking on system components that require hardware access (kernel drivers, NetworkManager) 2) Hacking on system components that don't

Re: Application id, XDG App, and you.

Hi, > One thing I've wanted in the past is a very simple file to allow > someone to declare an alias for an application. So GNOME Clocks would > ship both an org.gnome.clocks.desktop and a gnome-clocks.desktop, the > latter looking something like: > > [Desktop Entry] >

Re: Application id, XDG App, and you.

Hi, > Here's the hack we did for gedit for instance: Sorry, some how I lost the first sentence in my mail. I meant to put, "We actually ended up doing that for RHEL 7.2 when we rebased GNOME and various apps changed desktop file names," first. --Ray

Re: g_log_structured() and introspection

Hey, > During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC today, > it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the rest of the > interesting bits of the new structured logging API) are not > introspectable. > > I'm not sure what we can do about this. The API is based around >

Re: Multi DPI user interface

hi, On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > 2) Represent each monitor separately, generating one file for each This makes the most sense to me. Or even only do the active monitor. Of course for screen recording (versus screenshoting), only doing the active

onlooking k Kinnikinnick

___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: onlooking k Kinnikinnick

(sorry my 7 month old decided to start a thread and initiate discussion) On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 7:35 PM Ray Strode <halfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: gdm enabling Xorg to listening on tcp

Hi, On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Stephen Adler wrote: > You have a mechanism to turn off the use of the Xorg command line > option "-nolisten tcp" by setting "DisallowTCP=false" in the [security] > section of the /gdm/custom.conf file. The Xorg server now has "tcp >

Re: gdm enabling Xorg to listening on tcp

Hi, On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Stephen Adler wrote: > thanks, I just double checked on my fedora 24 installation, and it > doesn't seem to do what's advertised. Was because of a missing buildrequires in the spec file. Update is in updates-testing now:

Re: Too many broken modules

Hey, On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:12 AM wrote: > 'gdm' Do you hav eany details on this one? It built during distcheck, I just tried building the tarball into an rpm and that worked, and it's not broken in continuous. I can try doing a jhbuild run with the moduleset I

Re: Too many broken modules

Just to follow up... > Do you hav eany details on this one? It built during distcheck, I just > tried building the tarball into an rpm and that worked, and it's not > broken in continuous. This ended up being the moduleset's GDM requiring plymouth to build, and Javier's distro not having plymouth

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

Hi, > It's quite hard to get commit access atm because you have to be > trusted initially. If a maintainer can give commit access to one repo > he/she watches anyway there is less trust needed in the beginning. Or > if a new contributor wants to take over an abandoned project. > is that true? I

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

Hi, On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM wrote: > Another issue we haven't discussed yet is commit permissions. Right > now, everyone can commit anything to every repository, but with GitLab > we'll probably eventually want something more fine-grained where > *active*

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:38 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > That's a nice discussion to have, but a goal on the initiative was to try > to match what we have now (with the inherited niceties for those > workflow/use cases), with the less disruption possible, while keeping

Re: Missing releases and state of 3.33.90

hi, On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 2:24 PM Olav Vitters wrote: > Hi, > > I had various issues packaging GNOME 3.33.90. It seems that there's > various modules which haven't made a release, e.g.: > - no gdm 3.33.90 > - no gnome-session 3.33.90 > sorry, will do them. Ray

Re: Missing releases and state of 3.33.90

hey, On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 4:23 PM Olav Vitters wrote: > Ah!! I thought it was intentional (more testing needed or something) as > usually release team would chase as well. I didn't expect it just to be > forgotten, else I would not have used d-d-l. Sorry for possibly being > impolite. > it

Re: How to detect a gtk desktop programmatically

Hi, > So, with the removal of this GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID variable, how should > OpenJDK -- moving forward -- detect a Gtk-based desktop? So as I understand it, the choices for look and feel are: WindowsLookAndFeel, GTKLookAndFeel, AquaLookAndFeel, MotifLookAndFeel, and MetalLookAndFeel Of