Why not just create
desktop-devel-ng
and discuss it there? That sounds appropriate right?
sri
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:16:31PM +0200, Ikke wrote:
project soylent has moved away
I might notice we only changed to galago.info's wiki because Christian
seems not to like the wiki
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:23:24PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:52 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
But still, wasn't gnome 2 more or less a rewrite of gnome 1?
Yes, GNOME 1 to GNOME 2 is in many ways exactly what I'd want to
avoid. ;-) We salvaged it and got some
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:17:52PM +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 22:55 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
Of course, trying to rewrite MacOS nearly killed the company several times
... and it was only necessary because MacOS 9 was an unworkable POS. Not
something you can say about
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:31:58PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:37 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Some may think that it could encourage people to add more capplets, but
that's already happening, in the last 2 releases we've added Multimedia
systems selector,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:32:41PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Perhaps we should consider moving these into the -extras package. What I
think would be really cool is having a level of integration that allows
you to install themes right off art.gnome.org from your favourite web
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:43:26PM +0200, Markus Jonsson wrote:
What about when the system shuts down? Can I be informed about that? Can
I be alerted and logged out in a nice way when someone else runs
shutdown -h on the system?
If you're in this situation it's most likely not going to be at
I'm not really for this at least on the HEAD branch. Although, one idea
would be to branch off the ubuntu mirrors and get people who want to test
it build off of that? You can use the diffs of whatever the changes are
into bugzilla. Just a thought. I think I mentioned this in IRC.
sri
On
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:46:11AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 14:52 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
If this is what
Redhat thinks of the work done
I thought it was obvious, but I'd like to point out that I'm not
speaking on behalf of Red Hat on this matter.
It's
You missed my second point. If the icon is the application, then we
should provide an easy way for the application to use an applet
instead of the notification area.
Sort of like minimize to applet or something? That's not going to
work well until applets and application use the same main
I hope that you might also contribute your time in helping to make
Sabayon more useful for other systems administrators who might
also want to do the kind of things we're doing. It'll be useful
to understand the kind of models systems administrator would want.
sri
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at
So I'm seeing that everybody is up for Tomboy as part of the desktop.
Yes?
sri
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:03:38PM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
Ya, that makes sense to me. I'd like to move towards a pluggable
storage backend approach anyway, to support network storage or shared
notes, so
If nobody responds with any serious objections by Monday, then let's
just assume it's in.
sri
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:43:49PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:26:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Here at Sun, we have been talking with Fluendo about licensing these
plugins. As you can imagine, it is fairly expensive to acquire a
license that allows a vendor to
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:29:54PM -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Personally I suspect this will mean that Sun will take a wait-and-see
attitude with the forthcoming WMA/WMV plugins and allow end-users to
purchases the plugins directly from Fluendo if they want them rather
than bundling them and
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:37:34PM +0100, Iain * wrote:
Some questions that I don't have answers for:
Does GNOME have a product to market? How many people really get
GNOME from GNOME as opposed to the distros? Is it more the distros
place to take the software we write and put it together as
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:44:58PM -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
That is a big misunderstanding about how it works. Using a distributed
source system doesn't mean that doesn't exist any central ('main')
repository.
Moreover, it can works the same way it has been working until now.
The
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:47:38PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 23:22, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Even better, you don't have to give a cvs/svn account to every
contributor. Allowing the barrier of entry to be a lot easier.
You guys seem to be engaging in the SVN vs. GIT (or any
.
sri
--
Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
make install methodology that I so liked.
sri
Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 09:43 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Dec 27, 2007 11:40 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's a good question and I'm not sure why not. I think most of
us have a single person per computer but I can see where you have one
person logged in via
peripheral was fully exposed.
Warning users that another user is logged on is of course a good idea.
Agreed. We really want this.
--
Sriram Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:24:48PM +0200, Anders Feder wrote:
I seem to remember a time when there was an actual journalistic team
specifically editting and publishing summaries of what had been posted
within the community in the past week/month. What happened to that
effort? I suppose the
Personally, we should cede the desktop to other projects like XFCE that
work very well with minimal hardware requirements. I've noticed a lot of
projects in GNOMEFiles with goals to write lightweight panels and what
not. 10 years is a reasonable amount of time to expect hardware
requirements to
When we were having discussions on version control systems, one of the ideas
that I had thrown out for a git/bzr over a centralized version control was
that fact that we could branch all of GNOME on an experimental branch and
create a bazaar for ideas. A lot of times in this mailing list we get
@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove _@@_)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME
So, putting this conversation back on track:
* What are the barriers for accepting tracker?
* What do the tracker folks have to do to address them?
I think we're all in agreement that an indexer is needed.
sri
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Sandy Armstrong sanfordarmstr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some time to
get some real world testing before putting it into the release. Do you guys
have objection to that?
So the current barriers I see is:
* relative newness of the api - will it change further? You guys should
have some
build momentum from a popular language and have more
people from other OSes be able to take advantage of GNOME technologies. My
two cents.
sri
--
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove _@@_)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.orgwrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna
sriram.ramkris...@gmail.com wrote:
So I was checking to see how popular javascript is compared to the
others.
Javascript is much more popular than our other bindings
How about we hide it in gconf or dconf or whatever it is and then document
how to change it in a centralized location on our website as tricks and
features you don't know about or whatever. The idea then is to generate a
community place to go for these things. Then create a link in the
/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Paul Cutler pcut...@gnome.org wrote:
I think Alberto's idea of reaching out to nVidia is a great idea - if we
can clearly communicate our needs to them it can't hurt to ask. I'd be
willing to help reach out to them if needed.
Maybe I missed it but why are we
I recall that the framework was desireable, but a lot of the features of GAJ
could be sucked into Nautilus and possibly we don't need a separate app.
Again this is just from memory, (in a conf, dont' have time to look it up
but wanted to chime in) but I'm sure someone from the release team can
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Lucas Rocha luc...@gnome.org wrote:
Extra Information
-
We're planning to do the actual reorganization of the modulesets as soon
as
possible during this
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hello all,
A few release team members talked with various people during the first
few days at GUADEC to get a better feeling of where we stand on our road
to GNOME 3.0. We held a meeting later and decided that GNOME
Boston summit is coming soon, sounds like a good topic to discuss this in
person. Someone should add that as one of the items to discuss.
sri
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove _@@_)
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Kost enso...@hora-obscura.dewrote
It seems to me that we will need to put these things into live.gnome.org. I
checked to see if we had something there already but didn't see a cohesive
plan on this.
I don't mind volunteering to start this. I feel out of the loop these days
so it might be worthy short term project for me.
I believe someone was maintaining an rpath appliance. The live cds used to
come from that some time ago. I rather we only have one solution instead of
multiple. If Frederic is going to do it then I'll back off.
sri
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
On
2010/12/28 Sergey Udaltsov sergey.udalt...@gmail.com
What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
So, why bother maintaining gnome2 support mode at all? go to hell,
just do not upgrade is unbeatable argument, I must
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
by the way, this whole thread is pretty angry and confrontational - or,
at least, it feels a lot that way.
It has. I think though as a project we're not quite managing this as well
as we could. Not enough context for
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions before the
release happens i think. (sorry went into marketing mode...!)
I take the liberty
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm sorry if I sound accusing of something. I wanted to point out what I
found to be biggest limitation of writing extensions to gnome-shell.
I gave up very quickly due to time limitations - I had done none work at
2011/1/3 Mario Blättermann mari...@gnome.org
Am Montag, den 03.01.2011, 13:37 -0500 schrieb Owen Taylor:
There will also be some people that want to use gnome-panel because
they aren't ready to change. While we want to encourage people who
have capable hardware to update and use the
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:14 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I count three ways of doing that:
• Ctrl + Shift + U + hexadecimal.
• Compose key.
They are obscure.
• Character Map
Launching an app to enter a
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Christopher Roy Bratusek zang...@freenet.de
wrote:
So to summarize: As long as users accept what you want them to, it's ok,
else
they might go jump in the lake... Not that other Desktops fullfil users
wishes
by 100% but much more than GNOME3 will do.
I
Could we ask some of these open source artist websites like magnatune to
see if someone is willing to donate time or maybe we need to get the
foundation involved with providing some kind of monetary incentive?
[sorry for top posting, I'm too lazy to deal with gmail today]
sri
-- Sriram
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
2011/1/13 Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.se:
On 01/12/2011 07:49 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/9 Paul Cutlerpcut...@gnome.org:
No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
From whom ?
GNOME Enthusiasts I would label them.
Facebook (or whatever social network) is just a way to transmit
informations, so feel free to propagate it by any way you feel is
right
But I'd prefer to keep the feedback part in one location and no try to
monitor 10 differents
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Pierre Benz benz.pie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Pierre Benz benz.pie...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de
wrote:
Another alternative is to add a offline entry under available/busy
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:48 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com
wrote:
First of all, should those modules be provided as tarballs? Last time I
asked this for gnome-shell-extensions, I was answered no, because
distributions should not provided packages of those. Nevertheless, all
Hi Luca,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
We started moving things into gnome-control-center so we could stop the
various panels looking like they were a hodge-podge of thrown together
bits. Opening the door to 3rd-party panels would 1) get us the
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Feel free to follow the discussions about firewalls on the
fedora-desktop list. (...)
Shouldn't we try to have an appropriate @gnome.org list to discuss
such things (os level), if we consider
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.dewrote:
could keep it somewhat up-to-date. I will not share your suffering if
you do.
Haha! Lovely. ;) I just can imagine your face when you're typing that, ya
bum! :)
sri
___
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Something that has worked well in Sugar has been to start discussion
on the mailing list and then schedule a meeting on IRC. Afterwards
minutes are sent back to the ml where discussion can continue and the
feature
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joanmarie Diggs joan...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey Allan.
But past interactions have (in my
personal experience) been negative.
Can you elaborate?
Yes, but I was (and am) somewhat hesitant to because I honestly don't
wish to stir pots. I'd rather just move
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.netwrote:
Hey guys, it's Jasper.
Again, the last time I talked about SweetTooth, it was a month ago.
I'm here to say that enabling/disabling of extensions has landed!
Extension authors, you have to update to the new APIs
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Narek Babadjanyan baba...@gmail.comwrote:
I have read that the fallback mode is not actively developed, and besides
that who needs fallback if graphics card's drivers are fully supported (at
least in my case it's so), so you are right, I'm talking about the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:42 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
A draft for the GNOME 3.3 schedule is available at
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree#Schedule
Comments are
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hello all,
+ Jumplists
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
→ didn't heard much opinion of it from designers
Jumplists is predicated on choosing an engine like zeitgeist. So there is
a bigger
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org
wrote:
Hello all,
+ Jumplists
https://live.gnome.org
However, I don't want too see Boxes as a solution, it's just a tool
that will allow you to use VMs and remote machines.
It could be a plus when we'll release a full GNOME OS, but when this
will occur IT professionists and tech enthusiast people will show more
interest in supported protocols
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.netwrote:
There is no single sign on at the moment. Vinnicus Depizzol's study
mentioned that users would like a single sign on, and I'm all for
integrating with it once it appears.
This seems to be something we could add to
On Mar 12, 2012 6:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Pessulus was a configuration lockdown editor for GNOME 2. It never got
ported to GNOME 3, as it more or less involves a complete rewrite (move
to introspection-based bindings and move to GSettings) and nobody found
the
+1 for me. I think there is some great potential for interesting features
in GNOME. I've always been a big fan of the mapping of documents on a
calendar so I know what I was working on a particular day.
As a marketing guy, I'd like us to beat our competition with unique
features that can't be
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Colin
The issue is not so much time as unreliability. I've tried to address
some of those with jhbuild, but there are two major ones remaining:
1) Building from unclean source tree - stale Makefiles, leftover
binaries, etc.
2) Our lack of multi-module
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not saying that the feature proposal process is perfectly clear
though. ;)
It's a little rough, because we are only talking about features; we don't
really get to address new technologies or libraries that we might
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides
everything for GNOME Project are the Design team or the RedHat employees
and not the community.
Please, can we not finger specific companies when
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/4/21 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.orgwrote:
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides
everything for GNOME
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
For instance, let's say Xan who has indicated some interest to use
Zeitgist
in Web wanted to use it but not add any new features but instead uses Zg
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Florian Max florian.muell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Emily Gonyer emilyyr...@gmail.comwrote:
Then the design team ought to be more open about what exactly 'their'
vision for gnome is, as well as open to other ideas/concepts. Insisting
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 18:21 +0200, Florian Max wrote:
Which brings us to the matter of openness: the results of everything
the design team does ends up
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se wrote:
org.gnome.OnlineAccounts service.
What remains to be done is to make Evolution listen for new Exchange
accounts
configured through GOA just as it does currently for Google accounts.
I assume that you are able to use
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
The change is trivial. It is only required to change the default value
of 'toolkit-accessibility' on
org.gnome.desktop.interface.gschema.xml.in.in. A one-liner patch.
Owner
=
Alejandro Piñeiro and
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rodrigo Moya rodr...@gnome-db.org wrote:
then, why not do the proposals for new designs here in d-d-l? That way
you might get initial feedback before starting on the design, and people
that feel ignored get info on what's going on. Then, you can just keep
On Apr 25, 2012 8:43 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:55 AM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So there are lots of ways that we can do design better as a community,
and contributors on this list can all play a part in helping to make
be seen on other platforms.
sri
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove _@@_)
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
*Purpose:
*Zeitgeist is an event logging framework. It stores user activity in a
structured manner and provides a powerful
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
Woot! Well played sir, well played. Thank you for this gift. :)
Now if we can
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, again,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
I
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:44 PM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
It seems like the broken labels beside icons behavior should be
treated as a bug in GtkIconView that should just be fixed.
Don't
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.netwrote:
with each GNOME 3. Another was shipping more GNOME 3 beta updates to
extension community members so they can update their extensions,
hopefully in time, because as was pointed out, our developer story is
lacking
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:17 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
So, what to do ? Thankfully, we have a pretty awesome extension
mechanism in gnome-shell (extensions.gnome.org), and there are a ton
of extensions out there which
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Andre;
On 21 November 2012 13:27, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Can we make testing beta versions (and porting extensions to the next
major version of GNOME) more attractive / easier for extension authors?
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Raphaël Jacquot sxp...@sxpert.org wrote:
On 9 nov. 2012, at 16:56, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
last weekend, the release team met and discussed (among other things)
the DropOrFixFallbackMode [1] feature. We've come to the
Is there some way we could make these extensions and patches we can put in
a puppet install? I realize the database portion is going to be the manual
stuff, but it seems that it would be easier to be able to automate it. Of
course, this is just my observation and I have not looked at the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, the interesting part here is static application
registration. Lacking any better idea, this is implemented by looking
at the desktop file for a boolean key called
Matthias,
This is excellent. I will try to help find volunteers in working on these
bugs. Thanks.
sri
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.comwrote:
We are about 3 weeks away from the 3.7.90 beta release (which is
February 18) - a good time to look at the
I'm not sure how I missed this thread..
Regarding maintaining jhbuild up to gtk+ - I would actually like to see
this up to at gnome-shell. We have a number of people who I have convinced
to help volunteer to resolve bugs for GNOME 3.7, but are very frustrated
with getting jhbuild to build for
/pub/gnome/teams/releng/3.7.4/
2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
I'm not sure how I missed this thread..
Regarding maintaining jhbuild up to gtk+ - I would actually like to see
this up to at gnome-shell. We have a number of people who I have
convinced
to help volunteer
for
jhbuild with a least of each tarball (have a look at the moduleset on
the ftp url I posted). You can configure your jhbuild to use that
point release _and_ a single module from git.
2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
OK, what you're saying is that you get all the modules you
for
jhbuild with a least of each tarball (have a look at the moduleset on
the ftp url I posted). You can configure your jhbuild to use that
point release _and_ a single module from git.
2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
OK, what you're saying is that you get all the modules you
a while.
2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
can you build most of the platform out of this? That would be
interesting
to me. Since I can just point people at that instead of asking them to
build completely from git head.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Alberto Ruiz ar
Christmas has come early this year! This is fantastic news. Perhaps I can
try to get some volunteers to help file bugs on the build? What can we do
to make this a sustaining success?
sri
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Hello fellow GNOME
So, I've started playing games on Steam and started filing bugs on the
limited number of games that I own. I would like to encourage others to do
the same. It might even be worth purchasing a steam game account so that
we can purchase problematic games for testing.
It seems to me that having
. It is an
interesting ISV usecase.
2013/2/13 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
So, I've started playing games on Steam and started filing bugs on the
limited number of games that I own. I would like to encourage others to
do
the same. It might even be worth purchasing a steam game account so
that we
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Christian Kirbach
christian.kirb...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2013, 15:34 -0800 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So, I've started playing games on Steam and started filing bugs on the
limited number of games that I own.
Can you point us
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
