On 02/04/11 14:08, Adrien Bustany wrote:
Additional work that could be done for a document centric GNOME:
1. Integrate tracker-preferences as a control panel applet, maybe with
some basic monitoring (index up to date/indexing files, time
remaining)
Indeed. Actually, there are a few
On 02/04/11 14:08, Adrien Bustany wrote:
Additional work that could be done for a document centric GNOME:
1. Integrate tracker-preferences as a control panel applet, maybe with
some basic monitoring (index up to date/indexing files, time
remaining)
I also meant to say, we removed the
2011/4/4 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
Also, I noticed that Tracker wasn't part of the GNOME live CD, it means that
some of the plugins on the image (i.e. for Totem, Nautilus, etc) either
don't work or aren't available. Is that planned to be improved upon? Is
Zeitgeist in the same boat
Le Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:38:04 -0600,
Federico Mena Quintero feder...@ximian.com a écrit :
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
- 'Finding and reminding' in the shell. There are fairly detailed
writeups about this, and the Zeitgeist team and Federico have been
working
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
- 'Finding and reminding' in the shell. There are fairly detailed
writeups about this, and the Zeitgeist team and Federico have been
working on something that at least looks similar.
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and possibly
Evolution ones too. My attempts at coercing people on working on that
have so far failed for 3.0.
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:48 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and possibly
Evolution ones too. My
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:48 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy
On 29/03/11 13:18, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Hi Martyn,
Hi,
Thanks for this very detailed list.
Just off the top of my head ;)
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 18:58 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
For me (and these are regressions since Gossip, possibly related to
cross protocol compatibility
Le lundi 28 mars 2011 à 23:55 +0530, Allan Day a écrit :
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011 à 11:08 +, Allan Day a écrit :
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications.
I'm starting planning goals for Empathy 3.2 and would
Hi Martyn,
Thanks for this very detailed list.
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 18:58 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
For me (and these are regressions since Gossip, possibly related to
cross protocol compatibility in places?):
- Can't name favourite chatrooms so they have a hideous title in tabs
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011 à 11:08 +, Allan Day a écrit :
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications.
I'm starting planning goals for Empathy 3.2 and would like some input
from the design team on some point. So I went to
http://live.gnome.org/Design
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011 à 11:08 +, Allan Day a écrit :
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications.
I'm starting planning goals for Empathy 3.2 and would like some input
from the design team on some point. So I went
and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
Thanks for starting this thread, Matthias. I totally agree with the
priorities you've set out.
Thanks Alan too.
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications. There are already designs in the repository [1] for some
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 10:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
- Sadly, empathy is not a great chat application; with chat being such
a prominent feature in 3.0, we really should be doing much better
here.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Empathy is great. I definitely
to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook status
or tweet easily via the user status menu in the shell. I would also like
facebook
, as
well as some other things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
Thanks for starting this thread, Matthias. I
off the 3.0 train at one point or another, as
well as some other things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011 à 11:08 +, Allan Day a écrit :
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications. There are already designs in the repository [1] for some
of these, including EoG, the calculator and Empathy. There are others
that still need some
On 23 March 2011 11:08, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Software aside, we really need that new version of the HIG that we've
been talking about (Calum has been taking this forward recently)!
In related news, I have no idea what the HIG is supposed to be for
3.0. Some control center panels
at one point or another, as
well as some other things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
Thanks
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 March 2011 11:08, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Software aside, we really need that new version of the HIG that we've
been talking about (Calum has been taking this forward recently)!
In related news, I have no idea what the HIG is supposed to be for
Hi!
Finally, I'd like to be thinking about our contributor experience. This
might be something that has to wait until the following cycle, but it
could be possible to start the process earlier. I'm particularly keen to
examine the issue in a holistic fashion: we need to trace the journey of
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 17:10 +, Allan Day wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 March 2011 11:08, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Software aside, we really need that new version of the HIG that we've
been talking about (Calum has been taking this forward recently)!
In related
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
snip
It would be excellent; if you don't blog about it, it didn't happen,
and it has been so true with the gnome-design repository, we need to
publicize the designs and this will get new contributors on board, I
am really fond of the
the 3.0 train at one point or another, as
well as some other things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
How about
in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
How about a GtkMenuButton - so people can pack menus into a button if
they don't want a menubar in their application.
We are starting to see this trend a bit now, current examples are
Chrome/ium and Firefox (kinda), but it appears
things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
Matthias
Shell / core stuff:
- 'Finding and reminding' in the shell
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
- There was a proposal by the epiphany team to look at epiphany /
shell integration.
We are working on defining a roadmap for 3.2 and beyond these days,
but it seems clear to me that for 3.2 we'll at least try to
From: Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
- Accessibility: As Jon said in the discussion about the Universal
Access menu, we don't really have a story to tell here. Still not in a
position where we can turn on toolkit a11y by default, and the shell
a11y leaves a lot to be desired too.
the 3.0 train at one point or another, as
well as some other things that might be nice to put on the roadmap.
Some of these have designs and/or working implementations, others or
just ideas.
I'd like to encourage everybody to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
It would
On 22/03/11 16:13, Alexander Larsson wrote:
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook status
or tweet easily via the user status menu in the shell. I would also like
facebook message notification
to chime in with their own ideas and
plans for GNOME 3.2.
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web applications
in the desktop.
For Web sites as applications, there's the possible SoC from Epiphany.
For instance, I would like to update my facebook status
or tweet easily via
Hi,
Alexander Larsson wrote:
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook status
or tweet easily via the user status menu in the shell. I would also like
facebook message notification with the message
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 17:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web
applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook
status
or tweet easily via the user status menu in the shell. I would also
like
facebook
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:51 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Alexander Larsson wrote:
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook status
or tweet easily via the user status menu in the shell. I
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and
possibly
Evolution ones too. My attempts at coercing people on working on that
have so far failed for
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 18:09 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and
possibly
Evolution ones too. My
On 22/03/11 16:39, Bastien Nocera wrote:
As Will mentioned, those should be supported through Telepathy already.
A clarification: Facebook doesn't expose their email-like messages over
XMPP, so those are not supported through Telepathy's mail notification
system. But the chat stuff should work.
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and
possibly
Evolution ones too.
I think we can have a more modular system if we only set keys of
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:07 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 16:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
This would require somebody writing the Web Accounts panel, which
would integrate Telepathy accounts, libsocialweb accounts, and
possibly
Evolution ones too.
I
On 22/03/11 14:38, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 10:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
- Sadly, empathy is not a great chat application; with chat being such
a prominent feature in 3.0, we really should be doing much better
here.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Could you please
On 22/03/11 16:39, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
And I'm sure there are many other small integration points that may be
useful:
* Easily share pictures on flickr/facebook/etc
That's what the new nautilus-sendto is supposed to do (it supports
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:11 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 22/03/11 16:39, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
And I'm sure there are many other small integration points that may be
useful:
* Easily share pictures on flickr/facebook/etc
On 22/03/11 19:19, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:11 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Forgive me, what's the difference between this and browsing images from
Tracker which mines data from Flickr already?
Grilo is made to browse media, tracker isn't.
What are you basing that on?
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:11 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Forgive me, what's the difference between this and browsing images
from
Tracker which mines data from Flickr already?
Grilo doesn't mine the Flickr images nor other content: it uses Flickr
webservice to provide the content through a
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 20:05 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
The only way I see Tracker/Grilo being different is if Grilo does
real-time searching with no caching of the results it gets. For web
based services, this isn't going to be fast or responsive as using
cached data. You also can't
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 18:00 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 17:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web
applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook
status
or tweet easily
48 matches
Mail list logo
