** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #117158
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117158
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #50)
> (In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #49)
>
> So guess we would add additional bracketing for a 25% increment in scale
> factoring. Like this maybe:
>
> nDPI > 264
> 300 (so 3.0x)
> nDPI > 240
> 275 (so 2.75x)
> nDPI > 216
> 250
Just to remember this bug was happening also at 100% scale as you can
see on the Ckmment below with an screenshot:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117158#c4
I cannot test anymore, because I switched back to MS Office.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #49)
So guess we would add additional bracketing for a 25% increment in scale
factoring. Like this maybe:
nDPI > 264
300 (so 3.0x)
nDPI > 240
275 (so 2.75x)
nDPI > 216
250 (so 2.5x)
nDPI > 192
225 (so 2.25x)
nDPI > 168
200 (so
(In reply to Renato S. Yamane from comment #51)
> Just to remember this bug was happening also at 100% scale as you can see on
> the Ckmment below with an screenshot:
>
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117158#c4
>
> I cannot test anymore, because I switched back to MS
Thanks for the explanation :)
That sounds not so bad, but LibO really should offer the same "steps" as
the Host-OS (in my case Windows) does, that means 25% steps, not only
50% steps on Windows. Otherwise the Icons look to small or to big on
175% Scale for example. And not only the Icons itself,
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #47)
> And can you explain that sentence further:
> "The mechanism for "detection" of HiDPI is "thresholded" at 168 dpi."
> I'm not sure what that means.
See the source for CountDPIScaleFactor() [1]. It previously was a single
threshold of >168dpi; and that got
I did some comparisons between png and svg and Stuart is right, up to
150% the png looks better then the svg. But over 150% scale, the svg
looks dramatically better then the png. So can't we male SVG default
when scale-factor is over 150%?
Sure we can say: "you can switch it manually in
So just need to do it manually when UI is scaled >= 175%, the automated
resampling and rendering of the SVG *remains* inferior to the project's
deployed PNG at the default 100%, i.e. 96dpi resolution.
When and if the project can refactor to more effectively use the SVG
icon sets, the real issue
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #44)
> Ok,time for an update here too :)
> I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better
> than the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really
> looks terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
>
> As
Ok,time for an update here too :)
I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better than
the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really looks
terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
As far as I remember, SVG primarily was an issue on
Ok,time for an update here too :)
I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better than
the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really looks
terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
As far as I remember, SVG primarily was an issue on
Confirming blurry SVG (as well as PNG) icons.
Libreoffice 7.0.4.2
Ubuntu 20.04 Xfce4 4.16
4K-Screen@3840x2160
Xfce4 set to 2x window scaling
Probably helpful to narrow down this issue: In general, even PNG icons
are rendered correctly with most applications (Firefox, Evolution,
Pluma, all XFCE4
Created attachment 165049
Blurry Elementary SVG toolbar icons
Blurry SVG icons with LibreOffice 7.0.0.3 on Cinnamon 4.2.4 at
resolution Cinnamon 4.2.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
(In reply to moosetrax from comment #40)
> Created attachment 165049 [details]
> Blurry Elementary SVG toolbar icons
>
> Blurry SVG icons with LibreOffice 7.0.0.3 on Cinnamon 4.2.4 at resolution
> Cinnamon 4.2.4.
Editing to provide resolution information for previous comment:
3840x2160
--
You
In Debian Sid/unstable with GNOME 3.36.4 and LibreOffice 7.0.0, I
switched the icon theme from *Elementary* to *Elementary (SVG)*, and the
icons still look blurry on a HiDPI monitor connected over HDMI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
*** Bug 131946 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on HiDPI/4K
Just for your information. As an icon designer and mauntainer now all
icon themes have SVG versions. So I would say its safe if in some point
we reach perfect SVG support, than the PNG version can be removed or
moved to the extension sites.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
In general I think people with high DPI screens would prefer to use SVG
icons and live with or report a small number of bugs with a small number
of mid-rendered icons then live with 100% of all icons being pixelated
and ugly. Perhaps making the SVG renderer default only for high DPi
users of
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #34)
> This is the typical chicken-egg problem: LO's SVG rasterizer / icons broken
> => default to PNG. Everybody uses PNG (and some complain about blocky icons
> in HiDPI) => nobody fixes the LO's SVG rasterizer / icons. Some more
> background info is
This is the typical chicken-egg problem: LO's SVG rasterizer / icons
broken => default to PNG. Everybody uses PNG (and some complain about
blocky icons in HiDPI) => nobody fixes the LO's SVG rasterizer / icons.
Some more background info is in bug 133877 comment 11.
And OTOH people can manually
> Just updated to Version: 6.4.0.3 (x64) Build ID:
b0a288ab3d2d4774cb44b62f04d5d28733ac6df8
> First build since tracking the blurry/poorly rendered icons on high
dpi screens that I've seen the issue fixed.
Well, lucky you. I'm on Ubuntu 20.04, LO 6.4.2.2 (also tested this in
Arch and Fedora 32)
Created attachment 159915
Breeze SVG icons in HiDPI screen (LO 6.4.2.2 in Ubuntu 20.04/Arch/Fedora 32)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
Pixeled icons
SVG icons are rendered blurry on macOS, so adding bug #130678 as a
dependency
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2
Launchpad has imported 31 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115439.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115439
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
This is still an issue, and due to HiDPI getting more and more common,
Ubuntu should really look into this to give users a good experience with
the setups.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
Also related: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115439
You might want to change the title of the upstream bug report to make it
clear that it's all the icons that are affected, not just checkboxes.
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #115439
On 08/16/18 15:46, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
> Which icons are we talking about? The app icons displayed in the
> unity dash, or the icons in the toolbars in the actual applications?
I am talking about the actual application.
> Could you please attach a screenshot to demonstrate the issue?
>
>
Please also see
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114235.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2
Sorry for the lack of feedback until now, Paul.
Which icons are we talking about? The app icons displayed in the unity dash, or
the icons in the toolbars in the actual applications?
Could you please attach a screenshot to demonstrate the issue?
Also, if you get a chance, can you test a more
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774
Title:
Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on
Public bug reported:
LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 shipped with Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS shows pixeled icons
on a HiDPI/4K monitor like used in the Dell XPS 13 9360.
** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
33 matches
Mail list logo
