DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29239.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-05-26T19:18:36
Editor: 64.172.150.126
Wiki: Ant Wiki
Page: AntSampleFiles
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntSampleFiles
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -4,5 +4,6 @@
*
Date: 2004-05-26T19:20:39
Editor: 64.172.150.126
Wiki: Ant Wiki
Page: AntSampleFiles
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntSampleFiles
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
*
Date: 2004-05-26T19:21:23
Editor: 64.172.150.126
Wiki: Ant Wiki
Page: AntSampleFiles
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntSampleFiles
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
*
bodewig 2004/05/27 00:06:27
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ProcessDestroyer.java
Log:
Don't try to add or remove shutdown hooks while the hook is running. Remove
a processes.wait that won't ever return as far as I can tell.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The implementation does however involve a small Backward
Incompatible change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd say we can live with that.
In a response to DD you say that you can't mix an implicit element
with explicit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2004/05/27 00:06:27
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ProcessDestroyer.java
Log:
Don't try to add or remove shutdown hooks while the hook is running. Remove a processes.wait that won't ever return as far as I can tell.
Brilliant,
This
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The implementation does however involve a small Backward
Incompatible change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd say we can live with that.
Cool,
Should it also go into the infamous ant 1.6.2 ?
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This fixes bug 24181 correct?
I still don't think that it really does much (other than suppressing
the stack-trace). I plan to wait for the next Gump run (just to be
sure), then merge it over to the 1.6 branch and publish a
Sounds like a neat idea.
I will put this on my in-tray list.
Cheers, Peter
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
I think we are almost right there but, as anyone that
has used a macro languange, I think we are missing
the well known ifdef directive of most macro languajes.
This by the way is what others
Hi,
About a month ago there was some discussion of a 1.6.2 release.
Has this been shelved?
If not is there a timeframe?
I was hoping to get a release with the junit fork patch that was applied
recently.
I could create a patched version myself but I'm reluctant to distribute
a non-official
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Ben Sommerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About a month ago there was some discussion of a 1.6.2 release.
Has this been shelved?
If not is there a timeframe?
Unfortunately it looks to have slipped again, thanks for pushing.
Dear committers, do you think we can get a list
Dear committers, do you think we can get a list of must-get-fixed
reports by some fixed date - say end of next week? After that we
could freeze features and start rolling a first beta as soon as the
list is done.
Stefan
Maybe, but personnaly I don´t have time at the moment - have to
peterreilly2004/05/27 07:38:46
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html
src/etc/testcases/taskdefs macrodef.xml
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant IntrospectionHelper.java
UnknownElement.java
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Dear committers, do you think we can get a list of
must-get-fixed
reports by some fixed date - say end of next week?
[SNIP]
I'll go through bugzilla and submit my must-fix bugs
to the list next week.
Stuff I have not, but plan to, put into
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
fail nested condition instead of if/unless
[SNIP]
s/instead of/as an alternative to/
-Matt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
peterreilly2004/05/27 08:42:15
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant DynamicConfigurator.java
DynamicConfiguratorNS.java
Log:
opps: missed these
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +3 -20
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/DynamicConfigurator.java
But you were faster then gumpy :-)
Jan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant
DynamicConfigurator.java DynamicConfiguratorNS.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you were faster then gumpy :-)
This time..
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29252.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Add to that, the fix for RuntimeExceptions to be converted into
BuildExceptions.
We talked about it, but never finally settled it and do it.
Jose Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 May 2004 16:08
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re:
/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/net/dist/commons-net-20040527.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaf-1.0.1/activation.jar:/usr/local/gump
I've know about this, but a friend just brought it up to me again and
maybe I've mentioned this before
imported.xml
project name=imported
target name=some-target/
/project
build.xml
project name=build
import file=imported.xml
target name=another-target
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi, sorry I hadn't jumped in until now... the CVS
versions from both the main and 1.6 branches work for
me. I imagine the main branch is what you got from
CVS. In any event, if it doesn't work I definitely
need/want to find out why prior to the release of
1.6.2. We should probably take this to
Same as what I get, same as CVS HEAD... same as CVS
ANT_16_BRANCH too...
Let me know...
-Matt
--- Cyril Sagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ yell if you want to be taken off this thread ]
Matt -- can you first help me confirm that I have
the latest source:
I downloaded the image today, I
34 matches
Mail list logo
