Re: [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

2006-10-28 Thread Conor MacNeill
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit/. I'd like to release those files as 1.0Beta2. Stefan +1 Conor - To

Re: svn commit: r468260 - /ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml

2006-10-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +property name=javac.-source value=1.2/ +property name=javac.-target value=1.2/ +property name=javac.debug value=on/ Stefan, why do you have chosen the name

Re: A note on release votes

2006-10-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer the procedure which I have used for Ant 1.6 and for the betas of 1.7 to define a release date in the vote thread, and then to build and publish the release mechanically on the release date. I may have been a bit

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

2006-10-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide an open source testing framework for the enterprise. [...] The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are planning to open source when we reach

Re: Ideas on support of javax.script'ing

2006-10-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The idea is that ant-core code would first check for the language implementation in bsf and if that (the language or bsf) does not exist, ant-core will then check for javax.script support for the language. Sounds good. Stefan

Re: A note on release votes

2006-10-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Stefan, OK, maybe this does not comply with ASF procedures. I see that tomcat seems to be doing releases the same way as what you suggest and did for the antlib(s): http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=115859000312242w=2 This procedure for releases opens for me a number of

RE: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

2006-10-28 Thread Vladimir Egorov
-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:14 AM To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TestLogic is an initiative by

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40313] - delete doesnt delete when defaultexcludes=false and no includes is set

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40313. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40313] - delete doesnt delete when defaultexcludes=false and no includes is set

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40313. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - include if=property logic changed for javac since ant 1.6.5

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

2006-10-28 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide an open source testing framework for the enterprise. [...] The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are planning to open

war and web.xml

2006-10-28 Thread Steve Loughran
I've been updating the war file task with better support for optional web.xml files. Its been a bit tricky, but I've got a good set of unit tests. I so love antunit, BTW :) Here's the current setting 1 -Unless you say needxmlfile=false, the web.xml file is mandatory. This is compatible

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

2006-10-28 Thread Paul King
Stefan Bodewig wrote: If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6 compatible branch. From this posting I got a reply from Paul King, who explained that similar asserts are being used in WebTest project and that he would be interested to learn the outcome of this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - include if=property logic changed for javac since ant 1.6.5

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r468781 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/AbstractFileSet.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/PatternSet.java src/tests/antunit/types/fileset-test.xml

2006-10-28 Thread antoine
Author: antoine Date: Sat Oct 28 15:54:48 2006 New Revision: 468781 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468781 Log: fix for Bugzilla 40722. Was identified as a directory scanning problem. Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/types/fileset-test.xml Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - include if=property logic changed for javac since ant 1.6.5

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: next release steps

2006-10-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello, Peter Reilly wrote: I have some pending work on classpaths in script, there is a number of problems with the current implementation. 1) It does not work for language engines contained in the BSF jar. This is due to usual classloading delegation issues. This effects the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36733] - NPE in XMLJUnitResultFormatter.formatOutput under Java 1.4.2_08

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] New: - javac fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - javac fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - javac fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.