I was asking to myself the same question : why only 2 levels?
I think you are right, we don't need different type of targets, what
we should have is a new type of relationship between targets : the
PartOf relationship that allow to plug a 'lower' level target INTO an
other target.
But for the
I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on
cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always
failing.
Did others have the problem?
I already had some file-system issues on my machines when deleting
files, (the delete of freshly created files were sometime
On 2008-11-26, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on
cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always
failing.
Did others have the problem?
Never, neither on Windows/Cygwin nor on Linux.
BTW, I thought you
2008/11/26 Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-11-26, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on
cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always
failing.
Did others have the problem?
Never, neither on
Right. I see a part-of relationship of arbitrary depth as being best
implemented using a Composite design pattern. A target-group is a
composite for targets but is itself also a target.
The level idea was only an example off the top of my head, but in
thinking about it you are right that
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Bruce Atherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you could just live with the verbosity of the target list, like I did,
and use naming conventions in EasyAnt. I'm sure there are many other ways to
address the issue.
One possible way would be to provide an
