Github user pkures commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95680061
You are right, that it should be configurable, but the default value really
should be something more sensible than 1KB. There is no reason to use such
small buffer, memory
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95677851
I think this is something we should make configurable via a task attribute
rather than hardcode new default values.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Just my 2 cents...
In the year 2015, a 1K buffer is quite small. It is a bottleneck. I personally
default to using 64K buffers unless I know for a fact that I am going to be
transferring more than 1GB in which case I bump to a 1M or larger buffer.
64K or 128K was a lot of RAM back in 1982. I
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/1a584200e27de7867d7f613ff9c910dc0cc9730a#commitcomment-10875019
In manual/Tasks/tar.html:
In manual/Tasks/tar.html on line 155:
Shouldn't this be since 1.9.5?
---
If your project
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95691366
github pull requests are an option that we haven't used heavily, but it is
fine. The canonical aproach would have been a Bugzilla issue with attachment
(that's what we've
Github user ajmas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95704421
May want to look at this for a perspective:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/236861/how-do-you-determine-the-ideal-buffer-size-when-using-fileinputstream
while
---
If your
Github user ajmas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95706031
Last comment got cut short. How did you come about the 100k value? Has this
been tested on networks with smaller through put? Consider the nature of data
packet sizes. Not
Github user pkures commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95718851
I was thinking along the lines of ... the transfer speed is 1MB/s but
theoretically on 1 Gbit network you should see up to 100MB/s transfer speed
ideally, so I tried to
On 2015-04-24, Benjamin Spero wrote:
Thank you for your help. I have something to ask. I just want to
make sure I’m doing the right thing since I’m new to Apache. When
downloading OpenPGP, I’m going to the site gnupg.org/download. I’m
using a Mac. Under GnuPG Binary Releases, after
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/8#issuecomment-95794438
I appreciate the offer of doing more research, but it's not necessary.
The argument about the ftp task made me look into the other tasks we use
for transferring files
Hi Benjamin,
Just note, that you only need to check the PGP signatures if you have a doubt
about the validity of the zip files or that you like being extra sure.
You can use the zip files without the extra step.
André-John
Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
On 23 Apr 2015,
11 matches
Mail list logo
