Op 23/11/2023 om 08:19 schreef Stefan Bodewig:
I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the
purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects,
only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subprojects.
The correct process to follow is
+1
Martijn
Op 20/11/2023 om 04:50 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
...
So here is the formal vote:
I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
the Apache Attic.
+1
-Jaikiran
+1
checked diff to of indicated commit to rel/1.10.12
Martijn
Op 09/01/2023 om 02:30 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
+1
Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine
Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine
-Jaikiran
On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig
+1
Martijn
Op 03/11/2022 om 12:56 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
+1
- Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz.
- Installed locally.
- Ran java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version
reported)
- Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed
- Checked
Hi
I Reviewed the changes.
If the
https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/UnknownElement.java
changes address an Time Of Destruction / Time of Use issue it should
work. If "realThing" is created / changed from another threat the
changes (or even the initial
Reviewed changes
+1
br Martijn Kruithof
Op 10/07/2021 om 20:13 schreef Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48766
Maven artifacts
Reviewed changes based on tag 1.4.1 RC1 vs tag 1.4
Given the compatibility claims I tried to test against ant-1.8.1 and jdk
1.5 in wich case test cases using URLs are failing.
The failing of these test are probably caused by jdk 1.5 not supporting
tls 1.2 which is minimally required
Performed manual review only
+1
But:
- Fixed 2 typo's found (committed to master)
- should reference to Rhino being available in java 7 runtime be removed from
the manual (script.html) and should the system requirements in install be
updated to reflect 1.10 series requires jdk 8? (preparing
and the ant released
Please note, commit 80768efaab4003d90252095d160facfc35adc35e and the tag
are not visible (yet)
Martijn Kruithof
On 02-09-19 07:07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
+1.
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Installed it and checked the NOTICE file.
- Random check of some manuals
- Built some
+1
On 12-06-19 07:16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
On 11/06/19 9:54 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I'm a bit torn but would prefer adding it to the default script so that
running Ant would use the same wrapper no matter how you've installed
it. I'm afraid we'd have to ask people "how have you installed Ant"
Conor MacNeill schreef op 26-11-2013 19:47:
On 26 November 2013 22:04, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
Jean-Louis has been around for a very long time, owned committership,
contributed a lot to bring EasyAnt into the Ant PMC, and he is participating to
the vote in the
+1 Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
[X] +1 to add Michael Clarke as a committer
Martijn Kruithof
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
Martijn
Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef:
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On
Op 22-5-2012 9:12, Stefan Bodewig schreef:
On 2012-05-22, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I would like to release Ant 1.8.4.
Ant 1.8.4 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_184/
+1
+1 (w move to 1.9) Martijn
Op 30-1-2012 11:22, Peter Reilly schreef:
+ 1 and move to 1.9
Yey, we may even dabble in these new fangled generics
Peter
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Dominique Devienneddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Stefan
+1
Martijn
On 4-1-2011 15:59, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I am voting +1 for the proposal and volunteering to be the champion.
Regards,
Antoine
On 1/4/2011 8:53 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Let's start this year with formal vote about Apache Ant being the
sponsor for EasyAnt to enter
On 17-11-2010 18:21, Jan Matrne wrote:
Does anybody have a correct Apache logo (with the "tm")?
I haven't found any for using as "inspiration" ...
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 5-11-2010 15:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
So, do we want to accept the Bushel donation?
+1 Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
maybe we should add an installation instruction.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
On 2010-08-11, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands,
+1
On 19-7-2010 16:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
I don't really think this requires a vote since I've just repackaged
existing distributions (see buildfile at the end of the mail for
details), but it won't hurt.
Inhttp://people.apache.org/~bodewig/manual/ there are ZIP and
tar.gz/bz2 files
On 19-6-2010 20:38, Bruce Atherton wrote:
Ant supplies several tasks that require commercial software in order
to run. This is a problem because the Ant developers do not typically
have access to the commercial products required to test, maintain, and
enhance the tasks. It also means that
On 18-5-2010 4:11, Jesse Glick wrote:
Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be
split into subtrees?
[ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using selector to
conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs.
[ x ] Yes, split it into
+1 to use nexus to upload ant, antlibs and ivy
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
On 4-5-2010 14:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambertanto...@gmx.de wrote:
Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
[X] Yes
[ ] No
+1 martijn
No problems observed
-
I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a
warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will change,
published as soon as the solution is changed.
br martijn
On 23/04/2010 2:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
currently extension-point and import
Hello
I have quite some difficulties with the discrepancy of the name of the
task and that what the task is about to do.
Therefore, using the current name and functionality I would cast a -0,5
vote, as i do not want to be blocking.
I can see the desire for a task that changes predeclared
On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should
save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes.
Count this at least as a +0.5;-)
It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function
when we use a
On 2-2-2010 2:12, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue.
a candidate for ant 1.8.0 is available under
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0/
Vote
[x] Release as Apache Ant 1.8.0
[] Do not release yet
+1 Martijn
Hi
I am +1 on releasing this build
2 questions though:
Is it correct that no pom files are present for ant-apache-xalan2.jar in
the lib directory?
Is it correct that pom files are present for ant-parent and
ant-stylebook although no jar files are present?
Br Martijn
Jesse Glick wrote:
I would be in favour of using
targetgroup name=foo and target group=foo or even
group name=foo and target group=foo
the dash in the name is not something we usually do in ant
Martijn
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start a formal vote on the name of target-group.
[ ]
Hi
a +1 from me
Martijn
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows
build files to be written in Groovy. It can be found attached to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
It would start life at Ant inside the sandbox.
+1 Martijn
Bruce Atherton wrote:
+1.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows
build files to be written in Groovy.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
the compress Antlib which provides cpio and ar archiving and unarchiving
tasks in addition to alternative tar, zip, bzip2 and gzip tasks is
functionally more or less complete and I'd like to release it shortly
after 1.8.0 since it addresses a few bugzilla issues
+1
Martijn
--- On Wed, 9/30/09, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Promote the props Antlib out of the Sandbox
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 3:54 AM
Hi all,
IMHO the new PropertyHelper API can be
Hello
I am trying to test the adaptet get task using antunit, but I keep
getting failures i cannot explain
I do run the testcase in a simple build file without using antunit and
the log does contain the correct line, when running from antunit the
assertLogContains does not match. Is there any
Best way to contribute a patch is to create a bug report (in this case
bugzilla). The title of the bug report should start with [Patch]. This is
currently not documented well.
br Martijn
Hi Ant guys, I have a couple of etiquette questions,
1/ how do I contribute a patch? (or where can I find
+1 from me too, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Seems like an maven error on an 3rd party component with instructions to
install yet another 3rd party component.
Please contact either the maven or the clearantlib user list (that if
the error persists after installing checkstyle)
br Martijn
meher03 schreef:
Hi , I am getting the following
Doubted it, checked it and it returned NullPointerException.
D:\type Test.java
public class Test
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(String.valueOf(null));
}
}
D:\java Test
Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.lang.String.init(Unknown
+1 for 1.8 / main
doubting if it is a good idea for 1.7.x if we would make another one.
Martijn
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
This is not that much based on features available (although I consider
using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on where do we test.
The vote is simple. If you vote +1 then we
Hello
I know i have not been really active for some time now (changed house,
then job) yet I manage to remember previous discussions.
I still feel that the following reasoning is flawed:
There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
trunk. One of the aguments against
yes [x] (+1)
no [ ]
I performed some basic checks, here is my +1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to announce that I have a version of IvyDE ready to be
released.
You will find the files in my home directory on people.apache.org
/home/hibou/ivyde-release
Here is my
+0
I have not been
Ok
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi,
I've been informed (on the q.t) that I never actually requested a vote
before announcing that the ant 1.7.1 beta tarballs were available.
So officially at the moment, the tarballs on people.apache.org that I
announced are beta-in-potentia :(
A
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi all,
I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing.
I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if
there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to
let them in on a case by case basis
+1 on the plan / releasing a beta
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test
completion on the most
Marcelo Tancredi schreef:
Hi,
I am having the same problem here. What is the fix for this?
Thanks
-
Marcelo Tancredi
IBM Software Group - Boca Raton, Florida
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have added a link to the fixed source in the bugrep
in ant 1.7.1 the fix will be included.
Further
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
this change was intentional, a bugrep was filed that under certain
circumstances the generated file name was used before it was created,
which could indeed not be ruled out. For situations where only a name is
needed the method createTempFileName was introduced.
I see your problem and
+1 Martijn
-Original Message-
From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: jeudi 6 décembre 2007 7:34
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)
I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
You can download it from this URL:
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was already discussed, but the conclusion was not clear.
Do we migrate https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy
I thought this was already
Gilles Scokart schreef:
Did someone have an idea where to place the link to the sponsorship page?
Did we have to place it in ant home page only, or do we have to place it
also in ivy home page
In ant home page, I think a good place could be:
- a separate menu Sponsorship at the end of the
To
Recently I have put some effort to remove ignoring thread.interrupt from
all kinds of (endless) loops. Interrupting a few times (as other parts
may also wait in order to neatly close resources) should now stop ant.
Martijn
Darin Swanson schreef:
Eclipse is pretty similar to #1.
We
Steve Loughran schreef:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Hi,
After Steve's work yesterday, I was going to pull in the changes to
the release to try and get a clean build...but:
(these errors occur with the svn trunk code)
LocatorTest testNetworkURI Failure Expected
public void waitUntilFinished(long timeout) throws InterruptedException {
synchronized(notify) {
-if(finished) {
-return;
+while (!finished) {
+notify.wait(timeout);
}
-notify.wait(timeout);
Hi
Using ant 1.7.1 alpha on jdk 1.6 i have the same junit test failures ( 7
failures and 5 errors) and some antunit testcases fail 1 error, 2
failures (Furthermore it blocks halfway the test until user input is
received imo this is annoying for automated testing.)
results:
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
Hi,
it seemed as if the discussion favored a joined mailing lists of Anf
(and antlibs) and Ivy, so here is the formal vote.
Should we merge [EMAIL PROTECTED] into [EMAIL PROTECTED] and likewise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into the new [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan
+1 Martijn
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
Hi,
this came up in the thread dealing with mailing list organization now
that Ivy is with us, but I guess many people have missed it.
Do we want to add a new list [EMAIL PROTECTED] that will
receive all Commit, Gump, Bugzilla, Jira and Wiki notification mails
(and
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Tell me how to merge stuff in SVN and I will try!
I just copied'n'pasted :( apparently svn 1.5 will have easier merging
than currently[1]
http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79
I've been playing with git recently and I'm very very impressed by
it's performance -
Xavier Hanin schreef:
On 10/12/07, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe we could create the following lists
ant-bugs (gump, bugzilla, (what bug platform is ivy on?))
ant-commits (svn commits from both ivy and ant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
maybe we could create the following lists
ant-bugs (gump, bugzilla, (what bug platform is ivy on?))
ant-commits (svn commits from both ivy and ant)
ant-dev (development discussion on both ivy and ant)
ant-user (as-is for the users)
ivy-user (as-is for the users)
Xavier Hanin schreef:
On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want either, but ATM Ivy site is not integrated to
incubator
site, and Ivy is reachable at incubator.apache.org/ivy/. So why not
take the same approach here?
We can do that
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/07, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about using [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly, and discuss
Ivy
directly on the Ant lists? Ivy could be considered in a
Please review, I was not able to test it today.
(the { in the while clause is on a separate line because it would break
the 80 char limit)
Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Author: jkf
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:07:17 2007
New Revision: 581055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=581055view=rev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
The Ivy community has voted [1] for becoming a subproject of Ant.
Should we accept Ivy as subproject? Which means that we will share the
ACL and have similar access rights to subversion.
Our initial thought [2] when we starting mentoring Ivy in the Incubator
was
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi all,
It's time to get a bug-fix release out, and again today we're getting
messages from the user list asking for 1.7.1.
I volunteer to be release manager (but would like an experienced hand
to back me up procedurally and with svn branching etc).
+1
Martijn
+1 Martijn
Peter Reilly wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose Ben Burgess as a committer
for the ant project, with a special interest in maintaining
the starteam tasks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Yes - move the weblogic and starteam tasks to antlibs. [ ]
No - keep them in ant 1.8.0 [ ]
My vote is for Yes [X]
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
+1 deprecate for 1.7.1 if no-one dissents
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Martijn
Matt Benson schreef:
I'd like to create one. Any objections?
-Matt
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
Please verify this with an older (0.1.29) version of jsch or with the
latest Ant (nightly build) before submitting a bugreport.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
br Martijn
Jean-Noël Rivasseau schreef:
Hi, I posted this on the user list but noone answered, I have better
This vote has passed as there were only votes in favour of dropping
support of java 1.2
Martijn
Martijn Kruithof schreef:
Hi
Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a
clear result, here an official Vote request.
Given the facts that
1) java 1.2 is EOL
2) java
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla
makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira.
Accordinly, I would like to call a vote about moving to JIRA
[] Yes, move to JIRA
[] No, stay with Bugzilla
I believe it still is Java 1.2.
I cannot test the standard builds on it anymore and for my linux
environment i cannot build and test it anymore.
I remember some discussion from 2 years ago vaguely but can't remember if
it came to a vote.
I'd vote in favour of dropping support for both 1.2
Steve Loughran schreef:
OK, so we are java1.3+ now. Excellent.
Could we make 1.3+ that (or even 1.4+) make official via a vote?
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi
Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a
clear result, here an official Vote request.
Given the facts that
1) java 1.2 is EOL
2) java 1.2 is not supported by the official ant 1.7.0 delivery
3) the problems running java 1.2 on some newer versions of operating
I have marked all those bugreps as resolved / invalid, and added the
developers list again, because the guy tried to hide his activity from
us (he did this all on 18-4-2007) .
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I have manually updated the api manual page at the ant website to
display the original placeholder message.
(now without the in-between frame pages, where things got broken)
(For obvious reasons this page is not updated via svn.)
If you see this page online at ant.apache.org, it is not a bug,
Hi
It seems that the nighly builds do not pull the most recent changes
(head) from svn (anymore).
Antoine could you please have a look at what is going on?
Br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi
I have installed a cron job on people.apache.org to automatically update
the web site.
Any objections?
Script: /home/jkf/updateweb
#!/bin/tcsh
cd /www/ant.apache.org
/usr/local/bin/svn up | /usr/bin/grep -v At revision
crontab:
57 2 * * * /home/jkf/updateweb
br Martijn
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hi,
I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
Regards,
Antoine
Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1
here.
Martijn
Original-Nachricht
Datum:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7.1, or until
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
I am +1 on releasing those,
we should however document
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
I am +1 on releasing those,
we should however document that the official release does not work with
jdk 1.2
Also in the WHATSNEW still
needs time on my machine :-( )
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2006 21:28
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility
Peter Reilly schreef:
On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL
Peter Reilly schreef:
On 11/23/06, Dave Brosius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
protected void fireMessageLogged(Project project, String message,
int priority) {
fireMessageLogged(project, message, priority);
}
That does incorrect.
It possible
As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles
on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on
the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK 1.2.
I am not too concerned about dropping support for JDK 1.2, but we should
agree on
Peter Reilly schreef:
On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles
on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on
the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK 1.2.
What
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hi,
Steve Loughran entered a bug report asking for creating a POM for
ant-testutil.jar. This is easy. The real issue is that until now this artefact
was not part of our binary distribution.
So let's vote on the following
Do you want to add ant-testutil.jar to
Hi
On jdk 1.3 the test
testFromURI()
will fail because with jdk 1.3 no drive letter is inserted for a path
that does not contain a drive letter.
with jdk 1.5 the drive letter is inserted for a path that is drive
absolute
the fromURI method has javadoc claiming the following:
/**
*
Hi
It seems our release candidate is not nearly compatible with JDK 1.2.2
JDK 1.2.2_017 on windows XP home gives:
D:\data\eclipseworkspace\ant-trunkapache-ant-1.7.0RC1\bin\ant test
Buildfile: build.xml
A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
occurred
in :
+0 Martijn
On 10/29/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them
to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/dotnet-antlib/ and propose to
release them as 1.0 final.
As described on the release plan for this Antlib I don't
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hello Stefan,
did a quick verification of the download of the tar.gz. Works fine,
checked md5 and signature.
By the way, if you svn checkout openpgp from jakarta commons sandbox,
the ant task to gpg sign binary files is here, and you can build it with
mvn install.
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS?rev=354209r1=354208r2=354209view=diff
==
Binary files -
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I propose to build a third beta on Sunday, October 15th
the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B3
the version returned by ant -version would be : ant 1.7.0Beta3
Regards,
Antoine
+1 Martijn
, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion.
should we defer resolving references until runtime:
original message
Currently in ant, there is two steps in processing
a project build file, a parsing step
+1
Martijn
Peter Reilly wrote:
+1
Peter
On 9/10/06, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Conor
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I propose to build a second beta on Sunday, September 17th
the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B2
the version returned by ant -version would
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
