Re: SonarQube

ting the runner from within an Ant build file > would be an option, I'll try to carve out some time for that. > > Stefan > >> On 2016-12-19, Michael Clarke wrote: >> >> Stefan, > >> It's failing as the slave is running on Java 7 so can't read the SonarQub

Re: SonarQube

Stefan, It's failing as the slave is running on Java 7 so can't read the SonarQube plugin's Java 8 classes. You'll need to find a slave running on Java 8 (not just with Java 8 installed), although I couldn't find one from the quick selection I checked. Thanks Michael > On 19 Dec 2016, at

Re: IntelliJ Idea licenses

I'm interested in this. On 7 March 2016 at 02:53, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request open source licenses for Intellij in the name of > the Apache Ant project. > > Who is interested ? > > Best regards, > > Antoine >

Re: Drop Support for Java5, Move on to Ant 1.10.0?

I personally don't think we should constrain ourselves to supporting End of Life'd versions of Java: anyone wanting to use an older version of Java can download an older version of Ant. That being said, Ant doesn't introduce major new features particularly often so we may not be losing too much by

Re: Ant-Matrix-Job

I've applied a fix to the Jenkins Matrix Plugin for the issue that Olivier raised, and jglick has kindly merged it and released the plugin. We'll need one of the Jenkins admins to update the matrix plugin (or downgrade Jenkins) to hopefully bring our matrix job back. On 6 May 2014 12:27, Antoine

Re: [VOTE] migration to git

+1 from me for Ant, +0 for the other associated projects. I'm happy to help with any migration or post migration cleanup of docs/processes, but am only properly familiar with the Ant core so may not be much help with the likes of Ivy but can give it a shot if needed. On 28 Apr 2014, at 13:32,

Re: AW: Migrating to Git

I think a move to Git is a good idea. I personally don't have a huge issue with using Subversion, but Git would make it easier to allow potentially high impact changes to be made outside of the mainline repository. These changes could then be opened up for review by others before any decision

Re: svn commit: r1588563 [4/16] - in /ant/core/trunk: ./ manual/ manual/Types/ src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/ src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/ src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/antlr/ src/etc/testc

buildRule.executeTarget(test1); == could the BuildFileRule use a default (test name) for executeTarget? buildRule.executeTarget(); I'm not sure it can - the same build file is often used for multiple tests, each calling a different target, so how would we know which target was intending

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix » JDK 1.6 (latest),Windows #697

The Jenkins master got rebooted shortly after this failure so I don't know if the Ops were already up to something. Neither Windows slave is currently active so I can't see if the reboot has recovered the build or not. Our Windows builds just generally don't seem right: JDK 1.8 on Windows gives

Migration of Ant test to JUnit4

Hi, I've now completed the migration of Ant's test cases to JUnit4 and would like to give other developers a chance to review/comment on these changes before I merge them back into SVN. My changes can be found on Github at https://github.com/mc1arke/ant/tree/JUnit4Conversion (

Re: svn commit: r1580520 - in /ant/core/trunk: ./ manual/Tasks/ src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/

I had started this a few months back ( https://github.com/mc1arke/ant/tree/JUnit4Conversion) but got side-tracked due to a job change. I'd be happy to go back and continue/finish the work if there's a general demand for it. On 31 March 2014 01:14, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be a

Re: [VOTE] Charles Duffy as a committer

+1 Thanks, Michael On 22 Nov 2013, at 17:08, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: I would like to nominate Charles Duffy as a committer. Charles has proposed a number of patches to Ivy such as IVY-1421, IVY-1423, IVY-1424 and recently a patch concerning the useorigin attribute for the

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.1 Release

+1 from me too On 19 May 2013 13:22, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.comwrote: +1 2013/5/16 Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de Hi, I have uploaded candidate artefacts for an ant 1.9.1 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist Let's vote on releasing these.

Re: JUnit4 requirement (was Re: svn commit: r1460264)

and without differentiating between junit3 and junit4. It would help if someone would explain the dependency in more detail. Regards, Antoine On Mar 30, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-03-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-03-27, Michael Clarke wrote: * the optional ant

Re: Adding if/unless conditions on commandline args

+1 from me too On 3 May 2013, at 09:37, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote: +1 2013/5/3 Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de I wonder whether we could not add if an unless on all nested elements in the framework ? Regards, Antoine On May 3, 2013, at 2:57 AM,

Gump Ant Build - JUnit3/JUnit4 changes

I've fixed the JUnit task to repair the JUnit3/JUnit4 split. Could the Gump config changes [1] be reversed so Gump reverts to loading ant-junit4.jar as part of its tests? Thanks, Michael [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1460263

Re: JUnit4 requirement

into a patch if wanted? Thanks, Michael On 30 March 2013 18:44, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2013-03-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-03-27, Michael Clarke wrote: * the optional ant-junit4.jar has been merged into ant-junit.jar as Ant now requires JUnit4. Is it really

Re: svn commit: r1460264 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW build.xml src/etc/poms/ant-junit/pom.xml src/etc/poms/ant-junit4/ src/etc/poms/pom.xml

+* the optional ant-junit4.jar has been merged into ant-junit.jar + as Ant now requires JUnit4. Is it really the case that Ant requires JUnit4? The changes I introduced for @Ignore annotations in Ant 1.9.0 shouldn't impact backwards compatibility with JUnit3 and I don't believe any other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.9.0 Released

From the release notes: - support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11 This isn't quite true: we now support @Ignore in JUnit4 but should be able to support all JUnit versions. The change in JUnit JAR in the optional directory was to allow testing of Assume failures with a

Re: getting List of modified files in CVS

This can be done using the CvsChangeLog task [1]. Thanks Michael [1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/changelog.html On 11 Mar 2013, at 07:32, salt2012 writemesaltwo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Please let us know how to get the list of modified files in CVS using ant. Thanks Salt

Re: Contributions (was: Re: Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant)

I'm not sure why my patch didn't make it onto the list so I've cloned the Ant Github repository to my account [1] and applied my example changes [2]. I'll leave the discussion around Git versus Subversion for others to debate (Git would get my vote for what it's worth). I'm happy to either

Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant

I'd like to make a proposal around unit testing the Ant core. Whilst Ant has support for JUnit4, most of the unit tests are written against JUnit 3. This itself isn't an issue, although some of the existing test structures prevent new test being written in JUnit4. I'd like to propose introducing

Broken build in Java 1.5

It looks like my patch to fix JUnit Ignore notifications has broken compilation on Java 1.5 machines. I've fixed this in the attached patch by replacing !String#isEmpty() calls with String#length() !=0 and removing @Override annotations on implementations of interface methods. Sorry for breaking