DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27099.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27099.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
antoine 2004/02/19 17:22:28
Modified:xdocslicense.xml mail.xml mission.xml
docs license.html mail.html mission.html
Log:
further preparation for forrest migration
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/license.xml
Index:
Date: 2004-02-19T07:19:00
Editor: 130.89.169.128
Wiki: Ant Wiki
Page: FrontPage
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/FrontPage
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@
This wiki has just been set up
On 20 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+author email=Apache Ant PMC/author
Apache Software Foundation - in the case of the license?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have you installed a new virus?
One of those now all-too-common virus instances that forge the sender.
You wouldn't believe the amount of bounces I receive for virus mails
that have forged one of my addresses. They've vastly
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 20 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+author email=Apache Ant PMC/author
Apache Software Foundation - in the case of the license?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
antoine 2004/02/20 00:07:11
Modified:docs license.html
docs/projects/antidote design.html
xdocslicense.xml
xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml
Log:
Set the author of the license to The Apache Software Foundation
Fix the case of
Wascally Wabbit wrote:
At 07:11 AM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your container class will need to check if the Task is
an UnknownElement and call perform on it to
convert it to a Task and to execute it.
(see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mbenson 2004/02/19 13:14:16
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters
TokenFilterTest.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/filters TokenFilter.java
src/etc/testcases/filters tokenfilter.xml
.
Opps, hit the send button too early.
I meant to say good catch!
Peter
Peter Reilly wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mbenson 2004/02/19 13:14:16
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters
TokenFilterTest.java
jhm 2004/02/20 00:13:37
Modified:xdocsprojects.xml external.xml
Log:
Antelope new url; new tasks: antariel, rundoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +5 -5 ant/xdocs/projects.xml
Index: projects.xml
I´ve added
- Antelope changes (new URL, compatibility)
- rundoc task
- Andariel tasks (damn, typo here)
Because I had a Up-to-date check failed I´ll have to check
my machine (tomorrow). Then I´ll do the typo-fix, html-generation
and 1.6-sync.
I post this to both lists because the three changes
bodewig 2004/02/20 00:33:24
Modified:docs external.html projects.html
Log:
regenerate site
Revision ChangesPath
1.158 +104 -0ant/docs/external.html
Index: external.html
===
RCS file:
bodewig 2004/02/20 00:55:30
Modified:docs contributors.html
xdocscontributors.xml
Log:
Adapt to latest board meeting results - i.e. boast a little 8-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.41 +5 -5 ant/docs/contributors.html
Index:
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/ant/work/build_ant_test-ant.html
Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.301 sec
Testcase: testDuplicateTargets(org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectTest):
FAILED
Should throw BuildException because: Duplicate
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should get a consensus on how to handle multiple definitions of a
target inside a buildfile.
1. multiple targets defined in ONE buildfile is an error, while
definitions via import is correct
-- modify the test (more tests)
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should get a consensus on how to handle multiple definitions of a
target inside a buildfile.
1. multiple targets defined in ONE buildfile is an error, while
definitions via import is correct
-- modify the test
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should get a consensus on how to handle multiple definitions of a
target inside a buildfile.
1. multiple targets defined in ONE buildfile is an error, while
definitions via import is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27078.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Matt Benson wrote:
Is there a reason why nested text in concat is
undocumented, or is this merely an oversight?
Docerror. Its documented in the appendix E PDF we ship with some
versions of Ant.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2004/02/20 00:53:54
Modified:docs contributors.html
xdocscontributors.xml
Log:
Well, let's face it, more and more time is eaten up by Gump
Are you the person who has been secretly correcting my smartfrog.xml
descriptor? If so I
Peter Reilly wrote:
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should get a consensus on how to handle multiple definitions of a
target inside a buildfile.
1. multiple targets defined in ONE buildfile is an error, while
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you the person who has been secretly correcting my smartfrog.xml
descriptor?
Nope, Adam 8-)
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I am +1 for option 1, though I do note Gus Heck's point about
the merits
of an override option, though of course that gets
controversial in the
details:
C++ off by default; virtual enables, virtual functions not
valid in ctor
Java: on by default; final disables, virtual methods
From: Wascally Wabbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:26 AM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
Yes, but Ant basically pretends they did not occur. It does
not try to deal with anything. In my situation the error
was an out-of-memory issue. There are some environment issues
that Ant tries to handle
Talking about viruses, those of use with accounts in apache.org
(or at least me) are getting gazillions of messages about viruses
sent to and forgedly sent from our apache.org accounts.
At this point I am just deleting anthing coming from my apache.org
account. It is that bad. If there anything
+1 for (1).
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 February 2004 09:34
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ant/test-ant failed
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne
--- Jose Alberto Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for (1).
Another +1 for (1).
-Matt
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. multiple targets defined in ONE buildfile
is an error, while
definitions via import is correct
-- modify the test (more
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Talking about viruses, those of use with accounts in apache.org
(or at least me) are getting gazillions of messages about viruses
sent to and forgedly sent from our apache.org accounts.
At this point I am just deleting anthing coming from my apache.org
account. It is
jhm 2004/02/20 04:24:04
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant ProjectTest.java
Added: src/etc/testcases/core duplicate-target2.xml
duplicate-target-imported.xml
Log:
Another testcase for double target-definition
Revision Changes
Ok, 7 votes +1 (4 from PMC).
I´ve added another testcase (passing), because there are two things to test
1. fail, if there are two target definitions inside ONE file
2. pass, if there are two target definitions via IMPORTED file
see the cvs-message
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Just a quick note that I've dropped the issue.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thinking here was if there existed two file
collection abstractions, say
o.a.t.a.types.AbstractFileSet and
o.a.t.a.types.maybenewpackagehere.NewFileSetInterface,
each could be typedefd to adapt to the other, so
that the maximum
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However on thinking about this (naming problem, namespace issues,
types etc) I realized that one could use the antlib scheme to solve
the problem:
I like what you outline.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we´ll earn the whole inter-project-dependency-problems. We have
to ensure that an AntLib works with all AntCore releases or fails
with a defined error.
Yes, we'll need versioning.
I see two things:
1. Plugging in AntLibs should
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Mariano Benitez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The diff was against the 1.6.0 WC, I guess the versions are just the
same,
No they are not. I've changed some stuff in CommandlineJava in CVS
HEAD for the new cloneVm feature. Please take a look at the code to
see whether you'd
2. It should be easy for the user to get a complete working
version of Ant.
IMHO we'd still have major releases consisting of Ant's core and
antlibs.
I thought about a couple of ... subprojects?
- AntCore all basis things
- AntLib cvs all about cvs
- AntLib ssh
-
--- src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/CommandlineJava.java2004-02-11
15:27:15.0 -0300
+++
/opt/java/ant/apache-ant-1.6.0/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/CommandlineJava.java
2004-02-11 15:08:41.0 -0300
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@
* Get the VM command parameters,
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opps, hit the send button too early.
I meant to say good catch!
;)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I think we need that in order to decompose ant.jar.
If this means making multiple jars from ant.jar, I would be against.
Why?
Even core tasks contains a bunch of tasks that really should go into
a separate antlib - the cvs tasks for example. I didn't say we'd
mbenson 2004/02/20 07:05:37
Modified:xdocscontributors.xml
Log:
Added me.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +5 -1 ant/xdocs/contributors.xml
Index: contributors.xml
===
RCS file:
Too lazy to figure out how to set up a jakarta-site2
directory, so I hope this (seemingly simple) addition
works.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mbenson 2004/02/20 07:05:37
Modified:xdocscontributors.xml
Log:
Added me.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +5 -1
bodewig 2004/02/20 07:11:56
Modified:xdocscontributors.xml
docs contributors.html
Log:
regenerate site
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +4 -5 ant/xdocs/contributors.xml
Index: contributors.xml
bodewig 2004/02/20 07:13:22
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit
JUnitTask.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types CommandlineJava.java
Log:
Allow subclasses of junit to plug in command lines of their own.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too lazy to figure out how to set up a jakarta-site2
directory,
by checking out the module of that name right next to ant.
so I hope this (seemingly simple) addition works.
Should now. I've also tried to move you into the correct
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant that the core - conditions, filters, mappers can be in
separate namespaces, but that these could still be in ant.jar, one
can have multiple antlib.xml 's in ant.jar.
Wouldn't that break backwards compatibility?
condition
or
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not necessarily in favor of adding vfs or
anything else as a
core dependency, but there are only so many ways
we can go. I for
one would be delighted to hear any ideas that will
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakarta checked out from apache cvs. Maybe build (don´t sure, long
time ago).
No, it's one of those evil jars in CVS things coming with ancient
versions of everything, but it works.
Stefan
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel like we're going around in circles here... :)
It only looks that way. And I'm not helping the situation by being
cryptic, sorry.
Maybe we need to clarify this issue:
1) Is this important?
Not very important to me.
You'll
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant that the core - conditions, filters, mappers can be in
separate namespaces, but that these could still be in ant.jar, one
can have multiple antlib.xml 's in ant.jar.
Wouldn't that break backwards
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant that the core - conditions, filters, mappers can be in
separate namespaces, but that these could still be in
ant.jar, one can
have multiple antlib.xml 's in ant.jar.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jhm 2004/02/20 00:13:37
Modified:xdocsprojects.xml external.xml
Log:
Antelope new url; new tasks: antariel, rundoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +5 -5 ant/xdocs/projects.xml
Index: projects.xml
Stefan,
Thanks to you too!
Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2004/02/20 00:33:24
Modified:docs external.html projects.html
Log:
regenerate site
Revision ChangesPath
1.158 +104 -0ant/docs/external.html
Index: external.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mbenson 2004/02/20 14:15:52
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java
.WHATSNEW
Log:
Cause AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest to pass on cygwin.
Revision ChangesPath
1.98 +3 -3 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java
59 matches
Mail list logo
