Thanks Stefan,
I prefer a 1.9.8 release since we are still using Java 6 and we are suffering
from the wrapper script issues.Personally I think the 'new feature'-set is a
bit too small to have a 1.10.0 release, but I can follow Jan to create it
nontheless as a signal.
Maarten
Van: Jan
Thanks for volunteering.
I prefer having a 1.10.0 as a signal "we have a Java8-version".
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Dezember 2016 15:11
> An: dev@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: Releasing Ant 1.9.8 (and maybe
Perhaps you're right... I thought of splitting of /sources from SVN site
repo into separate Git repos. Then, pages compiled from /sources and/or
project documentation releases corresponding to /doc will be published to
asf-site branch in respective repo (not unlike gh-pages branch with Github
I don't see any benefit of having one repo for all sites as they are built
differently (ant+velocity, xooki, ...).
Where we need the sites? Only online or in distros/manuals?
I don't know the git-site-workflow, but I think I had heard something like
gitpubsub ...
Alternatively we could commit
