DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18667] - javah module no longer works with Java 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice little IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some places inside tomcat used Class.forName

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18768] - WAR task (or ZIP base ?) generates amazing archives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18768. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18786] - exec cannot execute all command lines...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18786. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18807] New: - Pro*C

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18807. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of exec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18708. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of exec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18708. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

WG: New external resource found

Ok, Brian, sais 1.4 and above :-) Jan Matèrne -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Brian Dueck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 8. April 2003 13:01 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: New external resource found Thanks for the cross post Jan. JMX4Ant should work fine with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] New: - Core task war broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18809. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 05:42:53 Modified:docs external.html xdocsexternal.xml Log: Add pointer to JMX4Ant. Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.110 +53 -0 ant/docs/external.html Index: external.html

Re: New external resource found

committed, thanks Stefan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] - Core task war broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18809. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 06:04:24 Modified:docs faq.html xdocsfaq.xml Log: FAQ about the broken zip task in 1.5.2 Revision ChangesPath 1.67 +19 -1 ant/docs/faq.html Index: faq.html

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 06:05:06 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH faq.html xdocsTag: ANT_15_BRANCH faq.xml Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.30.2.9 +26 -1

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. Yes, yes, yes. Sigh with relief. 8-) +1 Stefan

Re: Making URIs from locations

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note the change to resource (from resources) to be consistent with taskdef / available. resources has been a typo, thanks. I assume the url attribute's signature would be setUrl(URL url). Yes. Stefan

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

- Original Message - From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 06:41 Subject: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the Beta. Please indicate your support for this release

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18793] - Project.getTargets() returns one too many targets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18793. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] New: - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18826. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18826. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18826. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14650. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14650. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14650. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14650. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17199] - patch to allow custom conditions (+ filters..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15449] - Weblogic deploy task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15449. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: having datatypes load classes

See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=104870800508326w=2 And http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199 I prefer the first link, since I'm the author of it, but the second link addresses the same issue. If your xmlfilter elements do not need any configurations though, it may