cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

2003-09-02 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/09/01 14:05:15 Modified:xdocscontributors.xml Log: Add myself to committers. Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +11 -7 ant/xdocs/contributors.xml Index: contributors.xml === RCS

cvs commit: ant/docs contributors.html

2003-09-02 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/09/01 14:07:14 Modified:docs contributors.html Log: Add myself to committers. Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +8 -4 ant/docs/contributors.html Index: contributors.html === RCS

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Yes, if you think of a good generic routine to parse strings into dates, then DateUtils should be the place for it. Antoine - Original Message - From: Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ant Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 10:27 PM Subject: RE: Timestamp

Re: can't build ant 1.6

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Steve Cohen wrote: I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little more information. Previous versions of build.sh (or build.bat) contained this sequence: LOCALCLASSPATH=lib/xercesImpl.jar:lib/xml-apis.jar:bootstrap/lib/ant.jar # add in the dependency .jar files

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Jan . Materne
BTW, your first post was to the old adress [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Maybe your adress book isn´t uptodate :-) Jan -Original Message- From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:37 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: RE: Timestamp attribute processing

Re: can't build ant 1.6

2003-09-02 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:14 am, Steve Cohen wrote: I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little more information. Previous versions of build.sh (or build.bat) contained this sequence: I assume you have the latest from CVS - nothing sticky? The difference is that

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
there also is a datetime attribute in touch. Would be nice to unify them - at least Java code wise. On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (with a hardcoded US locale, looks like the europeans (continentals) are not allowed to enter DD-MM- dates, MM-DD- is

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've put this logic into StarTeamCheckout, I'd say put it into DateUtils. because DateUtils seems to have a somewhat different purpose (like getPhaseOfMoon()??? :-) ) That's been fun to code. If you want to know why I've written it,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] New: - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Cohen
Actually, what about the TSTAMP formats? These are probably the most common in Ant. I think what I will do is accept either MMdd hhmm or MMdd unless user specifies something else. It's not much harder to do this than to enforce one person's idea of the right way. -Original

RE: can't build ant 1.6

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Cohen
1.3 -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:04 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: can't build ant 1.6 Steve Cohen wrote: I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little more information.

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl

2003-09-02 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/09/02 04:36:03 Modified:src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl Log: Display number of the column where the error occured (if present). Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +3 -4 ant/src/etc/checkstyle/checkstyle-frames.xsl Index: checkstyle-frames.xsl

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java

2003-09-02 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/02 07:38:19 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks cvs.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java Log: Add a reallyquiet attribute to cvs. PR: 22774 Submitted by: Larry Shatzer larry dot shatzer at spirent dot com Revision

cvs commit: ant .cvsignore

2003-09-02 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/02 07:49:38 Modified:..cvsignore Log: exclude patch.txt and patch.tar.gz to make patch.xml more useful Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +2 -1 ant/.cvsignore Index: .cvsignore

cvs commit: ant patch.xml

2003-09-02 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/02 07:54:14 Modified:.patch.xml Log: fix inconsistent handling of cvs.found - fail if we cannot use CVS Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +3 -1 ant/patch.xml Index: patch.xml

Re: patch.xml and .cvsignore

2003-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Larry Shatzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we add patch.txt and patch.tar.gz to the .cvsignore in the root directory, this solves this problem. Yep, thanks. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22888] New: - using regex package when optional.jar is not on classpath

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22888. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-02 Thread Gus Heck
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: peter reilly wrote, On 01/09/2003 20.10: On Monday 01 September 2003 16:43, Dominique Devienne wrote: ... It's not all about power, or one would use a real programming language like Perl or Python. macrodef, although powerful, complexifies the rules of Ant, namely the

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-02 Thread Gus Heck
Steve Loughran wrote: Gus Heck wrote: I don't think there's such a thing as experimental stuff. It's either in or not, and once in, it must be backward compatible. I'm sorry so few people chimed in on the subject of overloading the meaning of ${name} in Ant. If this could be changed, then I'd

RE: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-02 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Property interceptors are not part of Ant, and might never be for that matter. Using a notation that mimicks interceptors is probably not a good idea either. As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a new (unique)

cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

2003-09-02 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/09/02 09:17:40 Modified:docs contributors.html xdocscontributors.xml Log: Add some infos about myself. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +6 -1 ant/docs/contributors.html Index: contributors.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks exec.html

2003-09-02 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/09/02 09:24:02 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks exec.html Log: spell check Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/exec.html Index: exec.html === RCS file:

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-02 Thread peter reilly
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 16:26, Gus Heck wrote: macrodef follows (I think) the same rules of properties as antcall with inheritall=yes. Modeling after antcall...? I am wary of this as antcall is broken at the top level. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22759 I

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would be a nice way to map it (or Date, though that one's

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Cohen
This is why I don't want to use it. The starTeam API has a method to make an OLEDate (which it requires) out of a java.util.Date, and that's all I need. All I'm saying is that Ant should do the parsing in java, and only convert the result to an OLEDate right before it passes it to the Starteam

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Ken Gentle
At 12:56 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would be a nice way to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22774] - [PATCH] Allow reallyquiet (-Q) to cvs task.

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22774. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22859] - Cross buildfile dependency

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22859. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22834] - XSLT fails transforming file with doctype

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-09-02 Thread Dale Anson
Dominique -- Dang, I didn't know there was a competition going on! I wrote most of the Antelope tasks because I had a specific need. Feel free to grab what you want and put it in Ant-contrib. I like your loophole for your antreturn task, I didn't like the code reuse either, but the way the ant

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Cohen
I appreciate what you are saying. What I did so far, and none of it has been submitted yet, was to code my task to accept either of the ISO8601 formats in DateUtils (-MM-ddThh:mm:ss or -MM-dd) if no format is specified by the user, OR if the user specifies a time format in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22859] - Cross buildfile dependency

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22859. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Sounds good. Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ant Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Timestamp attribute processing I appreciate what you are saying. What I did so far, and none of it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15729] - StarTeam rootLocalFolder should be java.io.File

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15729. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

problem with subscribing to ant-user list

2003-09-02 Thread James Carpenter
For some reason I am having trouble subscribing to the ant-user mailing list, although I was able to subscribe to this dev list without problems. I tried several times, both today and yesterday. To subscribe to the user list I sent the usual empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but never received

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22863] - Can't just rename a directory with the move task

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22863. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22759] - antcall at top level causes infinite loop

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22759. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22883] New: - Enhancement to pvcs Operational Task

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22877. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22889] New: - Add string formatting options to property

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22889. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22834] - XSLT fails transforming file with doctype

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22896] New: - The webinc directive for the jspc task does not work

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22896. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22759] - antcall at top level causes infinite loop

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22759. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Ken Gentle wrote: At 12:56 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22863] - Can't just rename a directory with the move task

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22863. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22901] New: - [Patch] -only option to execute target(s) without dependencies

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22901] - [Patch] -only option to execute target(s) without dependencies

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.