DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26329] New: - Long classpath for JUnit reporter results in stack overflow and JVM crash

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26329] - Long classpath for JUnit reporter results in stack overflow and JVM crash

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26330] New: - Ant freezes when CPU load is high

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26330. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26330] - Ant freezes when CPU load is high

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26330. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26300] - manifest task munges classpath entries

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26332] New: - [PATCH] Robustness of checkTaskClass against linkage errors

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26332] - [PATCH] Robustness of checkTaskClass against linkage errors

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

OT: made me chuckle RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] New: - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread Jim Fuller
Got to be the funniest bug I've seen in awhileLOL. Jim Fuller -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 January 2004 18:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] New: - misspelt is misspelled DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL,

Re: FYI: Blog Complex build systems need a real language found

2004-01-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.jsp?thread_id=23426 I don't read TSS and haven't followed the article, but Jon is the build guy at ThoughtWorks, Martin Fowler's company. Martin has already blogged[1] about the same issue and my

cvs commit: ant/docs external.html

2004-01-22 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/01/22 00:34:43 Modified:xdocsexternal.xml docs external.html Log: Typo: missed blank Revision ChangesPath 1.115 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/external.xml Index: external.xml

cvs commit: ant/docs external.html

2004-01-22 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/01/22 00:38:58 Modified:xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.xml docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.html Log: Sync with HEAD: typo - missed blank Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.100.2.6

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26253] - [PATCH] Extending ClearCase Tasks

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13510] - CvsChangeLog should accept a branch as an optional parameter

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13510. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit / clearcase

2004-01-22 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Original Message Subject:failure notice Date: 22 Jan 2004 09:22:10 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For some reason we are back with messages from the cvs commit system being rejected because of too large size. Cheers, Antoine Hi. This is the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: FYI: Blog Complex build systems need a real language found

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.jsp?thread_id=23426 I don't read TSS and haven't followed the article, but Jon is the build guy at ThoughtWorks, Martin Fowler's company. Martin has already blogged[1] about

task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Loughran
just thought...who else thinks it would be handy to have a task that probed for a task being defined at that point in the build. e.g. taskavailable property=nice.present task=nice/ To date we can do the thing with the classname, but that requires knowing the full classname, an implementation

Re: task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Peter Reilly
Some quick answers without writing code; Steve Loughran wrote: just thought...who else thinks it would be handy to have a task that probed for a task being defined at that point in the build. e.g. taskavailable property=nice.present task=nice/ To date we can do the thing with the classname, but

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26330] - Ant freezes when CPU load is high

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26330. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26329] - Long classpath for JUnit reporter results in stack overflow and JVM crash

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19301] - junitreport fails for long string literals

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19301. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26230] - junitreport task gets java.lang.StackOverflowError during XSL xform

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26230. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19301] - junitreport fails for long string literals

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19301. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Shouldn't this be a Condition and not Task? This would allow using it as part of more complex conditions and/ or/. It also means it should just return a boolean value and not set any properties that is for the condition/ task to do. Jose Alberto -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly

Re: task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Shouldn't this be a Condition and not Task? This would allow using it as part of more complex conditions and/ or/. It also means it should just return a boolean value and not set any properties that is for the condition/ task to do. Jose Alberto Maybe it can be

Re: task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Loughran
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Shouldn't this be a Condition and not Task? This would allow using it as part of more complex conditions and/ or/. It also means it should just return a boolean value and not set any properties that is for the condition/ task to do. Jose

text support for macrodef

2004-01-22 Thread Peter Reilly
I would like to add support to macrodef to allow the text content of macros to be placed in the macro instance: use is like this: macrodef name=echotest textname=text sequential echo@{text}/echo /sequential /macrodef echotest Hello world /echotest The textname

Re: text support for macrodef

2004-01-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to add support to macrodef to allow the text content of macros to be placed in the macro instance: Non-committing +1... I like it. -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool.

Re: text support for macrodef

2004-01-22 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1 On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I would like to add support to macrodef to allow the text content of macros to be placed in the macro instance: use is like this: macrodef name=echotest textname=text sequential echo@{text}/echo /sequential /macrodef

Re: task available task

2004-01-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll do a condition then :) isreference can find a task by name if it has a reference IIRC... without having looked at the code, you might look there for positive or negative inspiration... -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26352] New: - apply.html and nested mapper

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26352] - apply.html and nested mapper

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26352] - [PATCH] apply.html and nested mapper

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23942] - Addition of a local property

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroDefTest.java

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 08:33:16 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroDef.java MacroInstance.java docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html src/etc/testcases/taskdefs macrodef.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

A path for Ant 2? (was Re: FYI: Blog Complex build systems need a real language found)

2004-01-22 Thread Gus Heck
This thread has somewhat stirred up my brain a bit and a thought that floated to the top goes like this: We do want to be able to write simple declaritive build scripts for builds. I think this is a major virture of Ant. But clearly when one ventures into the system of builds and such there

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26318] - misspelt is misspelled

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-22 Thread stevel
stevel 2004/01/22 10:02:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition ConditionBase.java docs/manual/CoreTasks conditions.html .WHATSNEW Added: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition

Re: cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-22 Thread Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: target name=testTaskThatDoesntReallyExist !--taskdef name=invalid-task-name classname=org.example.invalid.task.name.hopefully/ -- You can use onerror=ignore to test this case. Peter condition property=testTaskThatDoesntReallyExist

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks apply.html

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 10:41:28 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks apply.html Log: fix doc for mapper element of apply PR: 26352 Obtained from: Matt Benson Revision ChangesPath 1.25 +5 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/apply.html Index: apply.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks apply.html

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 10:42:00 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH apply.html Log: sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.23.2.3 +5 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/apply.html Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26352] - [PATCH] apply.html and nested mapper

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26352] - [PATCH] apply.html and nested mapper

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23942] - Addition of a local property

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 10:46:14 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: added textname attribute Revision ChangesPath 1.530 +1 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 10:47:57 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW Log: sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.503.2.29 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant TaskAdapter.java Project.java

2004-01-22 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/01/22 11:00:49 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH TaskAdapter.java Project.java Log: sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.23.2.1 +5 -1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26332] - [PATCH] Robustness of checkTaskClass against linkage errors

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25988] - filter filtersfile=../ ignores properties

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25988. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26300] - manifest task munges classpath entries

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: A path for Ant 2? (was Re: FYI: Blog Complex build systems need a real language found)

2004-01-22 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Hi, your are raising the question : what is ant's mission ? Our web site proclaims ant is a make tool without make's wrinkles. Really ant's core is an engine which can instantiate java objects out of XML project files, and run tasks grouped in targets optionally linked by dependencies. One can

pathconvert mapping

2004-01-22 Thread Matt Benson
Is there a reason pathconvert has only its crippled map nested elements? Wouldn't it make sense to be able to specify actual mapper elements? -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/

Re: FYI: Blog Complex build systems need a real language found

2004-01-22 Thread Thomas Schapitz
Oh mirror, please tell me, who in the world has the most complicated build script? In the comments regarding the article I found one crucial hint that I want to emphasize: Big Projects usually have two sorts of dependencies, that need build managing: A vertical one, according to the software

Re: pathconvert mapping

2004-01-22 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Matt Benson wrote: Is there a reason pathconvert has only its crippled map nested elements? Wouldn't it make sense to be able to specify actual mapper elements? -Matt __ Hi Matt, yes I think this would make sense. Antoine

Re: pathconvert mapping

2004-01-22 Thread Matt Benson
Good enough for me... Bugzilla, here I come! -Matt --- Antoine_Lévy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Benson wrote: Is there a reason pathconvert has only its crippled map nested elements? Wouldn't it make sense to be able to specify actual mapper elements? -Matt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] New: - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26365] New: - MacroDef test case testIgnoreElementCase fails

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26365. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26365] - MacroDef test case testIgnoreElementCase fails

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26365. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.