DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/01/28 02:01:20 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Document Java 1.5 support Revision ChangesPath 1.531 +5 -1 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util JavaEnvUtils.java

2004-01-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/01/28 02:33:24 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH javac.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Javac.java

Re: What about a per directory javac compiler

2004-01-28 Thread Ernst de Haan
Wouldn't it be a solution to copy all the files that should be in one package to a single directory (e.g. build/src/java/) and then do the regular operations on that directory? Ernst On woensdag 28 januari 2004 07:00, Antony Paul wrote: Hi all, I need to compile files which are in

Re: text support for macrodef

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Dominique Devienne wrote: How about: macrodef name=macro attribute name=... / element name=... / text name=... trim=true optional=true ... / sequential ... /sequential /macrodef ??? Makes it an nested element of macrodef, which allows to have interesting attributes like 'trim', 'optional',

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

2004-01-28 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/01/28 07:04:16 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html Log: Bug 25801: had written filelist instead of fileset. Thanks to Jim Fuller Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +6 -7 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html Index: selectors.html

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class should not be a problem. I have done this with TaskDef. In 1.6 it

Re: BeanShellDef - java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition: AList

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Michael Sunde wrote: Hi, Can't wait to see beanshelldef or something equivalent in a new version of ant. How about this for a task name: - inlinetypedef - scripttypedef All are good, scripttypedef may however get confused with scriptdef. reflectdef was meant to mean that java reflection was

Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Hi, I am working on adding the branch option to the task cvschangelog. (Bug report with 10 votes) I also plan to make a new task CvsVersion which will be able to set properties with the cvs client version and the cvs server version. In order for the ChangeLogTask to be able to delegate to the

RE: text support for macrodef

2004-01-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] attributes like 'trim', 'optional', or why not 'normalize', etc... --DD Ok done trim and optional. What would normalize do ? Thanks Peter. I was just throwing 'normalize' out there. I'm no XML guru, but I thought there was special optional text

RE: What about a per directory javac compiler

2004-01-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
From: Ernst de Haan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:30 AM To: Ant Developers List; Antony Paul Subject: Re: What about a per directory javac compiler Wouldn't it be a solution to copy all the files that should be in one package to a single directory (e.g.

RE: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class should not be a

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? Yes and no - but not too bad, I'd say. If you replace methods in ChangeLogTask with methods from AbstractCvsTask, classes

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? Yes and no - but not too bad, I'd say. If you replace methods in ChangeLogTask with methods from

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

2004-01-28 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/01/28 07:13:40 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH selectors.html Log: Sync with HEAD. Bug 25801 + 2004 :-) Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.15.2.4 +7 -9

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

2004-01-28 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/01/28 07:08:27 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html Log: 2004 Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +1 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html Index: selectors.html === RCS

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Peter Reilly wrote: Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class should not be a problem. I have done this with

Unknown source in stack trace

2004-01-28 Thread Steve Kelem
I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and having the problem of getting Unknown Source in the stack trace. I've compiled (in ant) with debug=true, debuglevel=lines,vars,source, and even tried including the source tree in the jar file. By the way, the code I'm trying to debug is an

Re: Unknown source in stack trace

2004-01-28 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Kelem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and having the problem of getting Unknown Source in the stack trace. I've compiled (in ant) with debug=true, debuglevel=lines,vars,source, Sorry, Steve... I meant to respond to this the other day. If

Re: Unknown source in stack trace

2004-01-28 Thread Steve Kelem
Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't work. The stack trace for that ant task still shows: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.io.File.init(File.java:180) at de.pleumann.antenna.WtkMakePrc.executeWtk(Unknown Source) at de.pleumann.antenna.WtkMakePrc.execute(Unknown

Re: Unknown source in stack trace

2004-01-28 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Steve Kelem wrote: I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and having the problem of getting Unknown Source in the stack trace. I've compiled (in ant) with debug=true, debuglevel=lines,vars,source, and even tried including the source tree in the jar file. By the way, the code I'm trying

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25801] - filelist used in selector example with copy/ task

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

2004-01-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, that can surely break BC Peter if one used to cast a TaskDef into a Definer, no? Sure, it's not sensible code, but it's not 100% BC. All the old methods might still be there, so it's only 99.999% BC, which is fine by me ;-) I'm just neat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26384] - enhance CONCAT to allow property resolution within the body

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26384. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - pathconvert should support nested mappers in addition to its map element

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

FW: FW: ant pvcs optional task

2004-01-28 Thread Scott Anderson
Anyone extend the PVCS task to check IN files in addition to checking them out? Thanks, Scott Anderson -Original Message- From: Thomas Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:02 PM To: Scott Anderson Subject: Re: FW: ant pvcs optional task Hi Scott

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/01/28 14:47:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib ChangeLogTask.java docs/manual/CoreTasks changelog.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java

2004-01-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/01/28 14:51:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java Log: added @since tags Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -0

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-01-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/01/28 15:15:45 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ChangeLogTask.java docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH changelog.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13510] - CvsChangeLog should accept a branch as an optional parameter

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13510. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] New: - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26504. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java

2004-01-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/01/28 15:24:52 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks cvsversion.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java Log: got hit by a line ending problem, now this will be the right format Revision ChangesPath

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java

2004-01-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/01/28 15:26:08 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH cvsversion.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH CvsVersion.java Log: Merge from HEAD problem of line ending Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26504. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

2004-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24711. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.