Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/ ant-apache-oro/ ant-apache-regexp/ ant-apache-resolver/ ant-commons-logging/

2006-10-25 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Paul, Here is what you could add to your POM : 22a23,25 !-- NetRexx is not available on ibiblio -- 34a38,86 dependency groupIdorg.jruby/groupId artifactIdjruby/artifactId version0.8.3/version optionaltrue/optional scoperuntime/scope

Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/ ant-apache-oro/ ant-apache-regexp/ ant-apache-resolver/ ant-commons-logging/

2006-10-25 Thread Matt Benson
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:59:05 +0100 Von: Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] wow, you have been a busy little bee :) Happens sometimes. Had an argument with my wife. Compensated by workaholism.

Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/ ant-apache-oro/ ant-apache-regexp/ ant-apache-resolver/ ant-commons-logging/

2006-10-25 Thread Paul King
Thanks. I will submit a request and see what they say. Two questions though which you may or may not be able to help with. (1) BSF provides the engines for Xalan, Jython, etc. but the engine comes externally with the language for Groovy, JRuby, Beanshell, etc. Do you believe this distinction

Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/ ant-apache-oro/ ant-apache-regexp/ ant-apache-resolver/ ant-commons-logging/

2006-10-25 Thread Peter Reilly
On 10/25/06, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks. I will submit a request and see what they say. Two questions though which you may or may not be able to help with. (1) BSF provides the engines for Xalan, Jython, etc. but the engine comes externally with the language for Groovy, JRuby,

Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/ ant-apache-oro/ ant-apache-regexp/ ant-apache-resolver/ ant-commons-logging/

2006-10-25 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:06:18 +1000 Von: Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r466627 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms: ./ ant-antlr/ ant-apache-bcel/ ant-apache-bsf/ ant-apache-log4j/

svn commit: r467828 - in /ant/core/trunk: ./ docs/manual/OptionalTasks/ src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/ src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ src/tests/junit/org/apache/tools/ant/taskd

2006-10-25 Thread antoine
Author: antoine Date: Wed Oct 25 18:39:57 2006 New Revision: 467828 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467828 Log: add regex attribute to echoproperties task. Bugzilla 40019. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/echoproperties.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40019] - Add shorcut regex attribute to echoproperties

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

next release steps

2006-10-25 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0. However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the change of refid handling since beta3. I could free a slot for a next concrete release step on Sunday, November 5th. Thoughts ? Antoine

Re: next release steps

2006-10-25 Thread Kevin Jackson
Thoughts ? I think there have been enough changes since Beta3 to justify a Beta4. I know users won't pick it up until it's out of beta officially, but the changes could affect some things and we don't want to have 1.7.1 out a month later Kev

people.apache.org still down

2006-10-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, you've probably seen that people.apache.org is still not up again. For me (and anybody else who subscribed to lists using the @apache.org address) this means I haven't received any emails from this and other lists since Monday. But I've seen a few threads in the archive I'd like to chime in