Thank you very much Nicolas. Having you around for code reviews and even just
watching is definitely going to help a lot.
Thanks for merging that patch too.
-Jaikiran
On 17-May-2017, at 2:09 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> Le 16 mai 2017 à 13:11, J Pai
> Le 16 mai 2017 à 13:11, J Pai a écrit :
>
> Thanks Jan for initiating this.
>
> On the ICLA front - I already have contributed and continue to contribute to
> some other Apache projects (these days mostly via github). Do I still have to
> sign the ICLA? Is there
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Backporting changes from the various forks would be a great idea.
On 16 May 2017 at 11:31, Gintautas Grigelionis
wrote:
> Ivy is also a part of Groovy, through Grapes. There are quite a few forks
> of Ivy on GitHub, perhaps it is worth the while to solicit PRs?
>
>
Ivy is also a part of Groovy, through Grapes. There are quite a few forks
of Ivy on GitHub, perhaps it is worth the while to solicit PRs?
Meanwhile, I was asking for help/opinions about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1478 (updatesite resolver) which
would in turn help setting up builds
The very interesting thing about Ivy, in my opinion, is that while it isn't
developed on that much currently, it's still the basis of SBT, Gradle, and
probably other build tools that are a bit more popular. I'm curious how all
those projects continue to use Ivy while its development seems somewhat
Here’s the instructions https://wiki.apache.org/general/PreCommitBuilds which
Kafka team apparently followed. They tracked this activity in this JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1856
-Jaikiran
On 16-May-2017, at 6:20 PM, J Pai wrote:
On 16-May-2017,
On 16-May-2017, at 6:09 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> - From a development point of view, given that there aren’t many who
> are familiar with the codebase, it would really help build some kind of
> confidence level in submitted patches, if the github repo was backed by
>
On 2017-05-16, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>> - From a development point of view, given that there aren’t many who
>> are familiar with the codebase, it would really help build some kind of
>> confidence level in submitted patches, if the github repo was backed by
>> the usual PR processing
> On the ICLA front - I already have contributed and continue to
> contribute to some other Apache projects (these days mostly via
> github). Do I still have to sign the ICLA?
The ICLA is for the ASF - so you don't have to sign a new one if you already
have submitted one.
> Is there a way to
On 2017-05-16, J Pai wrote:
> On the ICLA front - I already have contributed and continue to
> contribute to some other Apache projects (these days mostly via
> github). Do I still have to sign the ICLA?
Whether a CLA is strictly required or not isn't always clear. Strictly
speaking the terms
Thanks Jan for initiating this.
On the ICLA front - I already have contributed and continue to contribute to
some other Apache projects (these days mostly via github). Do I still have to
sign the ICLA? Is there a way to check if I have already signed this ICLA
previously? I don’t remember if
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/11
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/11
Closing for now, since I need to revisit this to see if this is still valid
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Hello community
the Ant PMC hasn't been able to keep up with bugs reported for Ivy and IvyDE
for a while now. The number of active committers with the required knowledge
of the code base is getting smaller and we are having a hard time evaluating
patches.
We'd like to revive Ivy and IvyDE, but
15 matches
Mail list logo