As far as I know, the publish task itself doesn't fetch any
dependencies. The dependencies itself are downloaded by a (previous)
resolve task that is invoked separately and explicitly.
-Jaikiran
On 31/07/17 11:32 PM, maikel van den Hurk wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering if there is already
effort algorithm during install, so that
everything gets installed except the missing artifacts. (Note: these
missing artifacts are not in the public maven repository due to
licensing issues)
...
[1]
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/master/tutorial/build-repository/basic.html
-Jaikiran
On 29/08/17 12:35 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I noticed another problem with asciidoc: 1.5.4 fails on my box with the
latest Java 8u144, I had to downgrade it to 1.5.3 -- did anyone else see
that?
1.5.4 works fine for me with Java 8.
-Jaikiran
version) are:
org.apache.ivy
ivy
2.5.0-SNAPSHOT
and can be found here
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-Snapshot-Deploy/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
-Jaikiran
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223
[2]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.html#version--
-Jaikiran
On 28/11/17 10:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-11-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Maybe we really need to start parsing the java.version syste
most likely _not_ a coincidence. But given this a JVM
crash (in Java 6), it most likely is a JVM issue. I'll see if I can find
something on this, before we decide if at all we need to rollback that
commit.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/0fd2a86369aab41db316b1064a559bae08afae0f
-Jaikiran
[exec] [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed: 0.276 sec
-Jaikiran
On 19/12/17 5:02 PM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master c2c821a38 -> 3dad11d41
disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as w
On 19/12/17 5:13 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Looking at the JDK code, I still am not sure which exact code path
triggers this stale/invalid cache in this specific case, but
apparently it does.
Now that we know the canonical path cache is playing a role, I think the
only way this issue makes
Thank you. I'm moving ahead with the new proposed task. Hopefully I
should be able to have something functional in a few days.
-Jaikiran
On 14/12/17 5:14 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
With that context, I would like to explain what I have attempted so
far
It's back to normal [1], so the crash seems to be specific to certain
nodes on Jenkins, for Java 6. I don't plan to look more into this.
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.6%20(latest)/135/
-Jaikiran
On 13/12/17 8:40 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So we
On 12/12/17 8:05 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
The next few days, I'll probably try and see if I can get a Linux
based job to run alongside this Windows job for PRs.
We now have a Linux one too for the PRs
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/. It has the same
characteristics
Do let me know if there's anything I can do to help investigate this.
I'm curious myself to see what's causing this.
-Jaikiran
On 13/12/17 2:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So the one final test that's still failing
by changing the internal
implementation detail of this task (and maybe removing support for
certain attributes).
Either way, I would still like to hear others thoughts on this.
-Jaikiran
On 14/12/17 3:39 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've started some experiments in adding support for the recently
[1] http://junit.org/junit5/
[2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61796
[3]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant/commit/42c7f221a8cd0848df0a2d6cac2897c07d446bda
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
which check that
file1 exists. Furthermore, given that this is manifesting for all the
links in that properties file, it looks a very generic issue and not
just to this specific "link1" symlink.
To make it much more weird, if I run this exact same state of "master"
branch, by jus
removed, it no longer guarantees the entire block to
be done serially by a single thread anymore.
-Jaikiran
On 02/11/17 2:50 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
No need to synchronise a concurrent map
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org
inconsistent when someone adding new code using a different construct
(like not using explicit brackets), but it's not that big a deal, IMO.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For a
You are right, that indeed was the issue (for one of that failing test).
I have pushed a commit with this change to fix that one.
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
testCreateDoubleHanging is related to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla
I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it.
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 2:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See
<https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.8%20(latest)/977/display/redirect?page=chan
On 10/12/17 3:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it.
Target testCreateOverFile in the antunit test explicitly tries to
replace a file with a link, doing exactly what the bugzilla report says
of changes, I am willing
to undo them and go back to the original state that was before I started
these changes.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/b3c7d5dc451960986a94d24785a2c1d24b0b0d6a
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 5:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[@Steve I'm trying to drag you
.
Done. The documentation of symlink task is now updated
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/485b92fe7494c5473e019329cbf7a33e556acad6
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e
/
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
My experiments have completed [1] and any new mails from github/jenkins
jobs are genuine mails. Hopefully, the next time I try something around
this, it won't take these many spurious mails.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg46284.html
-Jaikiran
On 12/12/17 7:05 PM
/org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix/SymlinkTest/testRecreate/
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
testCreateDoubleHanging is related to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 judging from the
history. Here the link points to a non-existent file
Sorry about the continuous mails from github/ant repo. I'm (yet again)
trying to get the Jenkins job integrated with Ant github repo. I don't
have a way to disable these mails while I experiment with it to get it
right. Hopefully, it should be sorted out in the next hour or so.
-Jaikiran
Let's not force update the upstream repo please, especially the real
branches like the master branch.
-Jaikiran
On 21/10/17 10:22 PM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant-ivy
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 744c31824 -> 2074889ec (forced update)
IVY-1420 document curr
s expected that it should work even with file="*.something" then
let me know, I'll undo this change and see how I can fix the regression.
-Jaikiran
On 21/12/17 10:21 AM, jaiki...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 1a2c33fd0 -> ca91b859f
Fix a
On 21/12/17 10:42 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-21, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I committed this change below, to use a resource collection to allow
the build to pass, which had started failing on Windows, after I did a
recent change to the delete task to use Java 7 java.nio.file.Files
API
Looks like a bug. Can you file a bug in the Ant bugzilla? I can take a
look at it later tonight.
-Jaikiran
On 12/05/18 4:45 PM, Simon IJskes wrote:
Hi,
Just checking if this bug is known? I could not find it in bugzilla.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-781
Groeten,
Simon
should be available here[2].
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/d0f9c2e121e2b3a18b679705c2f2164426e7e6fb
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant_Nightly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/distribution/
it works!
Glad to hear that :)
-Jaikiran
://github.com/apache/ant/commit/d0f9c2e121e2b3a18b679705c2f2164426e7e6fb
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant_Nightly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/distribution/
-Jaikiran
On 12/05/18 5:30 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Looks like a bug. Can you file a bug in the Ant bugzilla? I can take a
look at it later
No problem. That change to WHATSNEW is fine, I don't mind.
-Jaikiran
On 13/05/18 1:03 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
Thanks, great work! I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty to adjust
WHATSNEW.
Gintas
2018-05-13 6:01 GMT+02:00 Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com>:
I di
on.
-Jaikiran
On 12/05/18 9:19 PM, twogee wrote:
Github user twogee commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/d0f9c2e121e2b3a18b679705c2f2164426e7e6fb#commitcomment-28953469
In src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/constantpool
0ae82f0d11171b2#diff-21eb59eaf9f2b5d0b487aeb5e5022ccdL888
[5]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/070c3bc86f85e8f01cb624fe50ae82f0d11171b2#diff-21eb59eaf9f2b5d0b487aeb5e5022ccdL1359
[6]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/070c3bc86f85e8f01cb624fe50ae82f0d11171b2#diff-b98a3d2097d6a9b5d7e0fc2eac033f24L348
-Jaikiran
it into some other form (thus additional code plus additional
objects allocated in the process), all this to iterate over it and run
some logic on it - all of which was already possible with the
enumeration that was already available.
-Jaikiran
On 18/05/18 12:22 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis
I agree. Especially when it's being done on something like for archive
entries which can betoo many depending on the archive that is being
dealt with.
-Jaikiran
On 17/05/18 12:04 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
Converting an Enumeration to a List just for iterating it doesn't seem
performance
Thanks Stefan, I'll fix these issues and send out a new voting mail.
-Jaikiran
On Saturday, June 16, 2018, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi
>
> please add your PGP key to dist.apache.org/release/ant/KEYS
>
> * checksums and signatures are good
> * for the files in updatesite it s
Given some of the valid issues that Stefan has raised with this released
instance, I'm cancelling this vote. This is a first release after a long
time and I plan to have this as clean as possible. I will send out a new
vote mail once I sort out these issues.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/18 6:48 PM
On 14/06/18 11:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-06-13, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
You can download the distribution from this URL:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ivyde/2.3.0-rc1
Be the releas policy that is in place now SHA1 is deprecated, MD5 is
frowned upon and at least SHA256
I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release.
-Jaikiran
On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with
a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the
coming days.
The alternative would
+1.
Tried the installation and used a basic Ivy based project for dependency
resolution. Also checked some of the Ivy plugin screens to make sure all
is fine.
-Jaikiran
On 17/06/18 12:15 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This is a newer vote mail that I'm initiating for the 2.3.0-rc1
release
Thanks for testing this Nicolas. This indeed is a big enough issue to be
considered a blocker. I'll take a look at this.
I'll also include the sha and rev in a newer vote and update our release
instructions.
-Jaikiran
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018, Nicolas Lalevée
wrote:
> First, thank you v
Given the nature of this issue, I'm cancelling this vote.
A new one will be initiated this week.
-Jaikiran
On 19/06/18 5:05 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Thanks for testing this Nicolas. This indeed is a big enough issue to
be considered a blocker. I'll take a look at this.
I'll also include
to call
this release 2.3.0-rc1.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
for the release of these binaries?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Gintas,
When and where do you see these messages? What activity triggers it?
-Jaikiran
On 14/06/18 12:36 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I am testing on Oxygen 3.A and seeing errors like
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/updatesite/p2-mirrors--xml.cgi
: Support for storing credentials securely
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1. I don't have anything in a state that I can push to either of these
branches, in the immediate future.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/18 9:38 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant
1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might
I pushed a bunch of commits to address these issues and have now
released newer binaries for 2.3.0-rc1 release and initiated a separate
VOTE mail for it.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/18 6:48 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
please add your PGP key to dist.apache.org/release/ant/KEYS
* checksums
Thank you Stefan, I forgot to add it to this location and added only in
the git repo.
-Jaikiran
On 17/06/18 2:00 PM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Sun Jun 17 08:30:47 2018
New Revision: 27516
Log:
Add Jaikiran's key
Modified:
release/ant/KEYS
Modified: release/ant
this commit, it used to print just the
stacktrace. I don't see how this change would solve what's being
discussed in that bugzilla.
If this isn't the proposed solution, is there some other place I can
read up on what's being proposed?
-Jaikiran
On 09/06/18 5:22 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
Thanks for review, Jaikiran. You're correct, that is the proposed solution,
adding a separator
(a newline followed by an exception name for clarity -- mind that exception
is logged only in debug mode).
The exception class name would already
On 03/06/18 3:13 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I have now added a section in the junitlauncher task's manual
The section's titled "Using the classpath element to include test engines".
-Jaikiran
to include an example which shows how to setup the classpath element
to include thet
an empty input and maybe fall back to the default value?
Given that the null return value happens when the stream, from which we
are reading, has ended earlier than expected, IMO we should consider it
an error case and throw a more legible exception inste
to reply
with details if there's something else you are looking for.
[1]
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/ant/master/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html
-Jaikiran
On 02/06/18 8:39 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
HelloLucas,
On 01/06/18 10:46 PM, Lucas Bullen wrote:
However, when attempting
Sounds fine to me.
-Jaikiran
On 04/06/18 1:08 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
one of the recurring issues that make Jenkins builds fail is a
thread-safety bug in AntUnit's log capturing code. This is supposed to
be fixed in AntUnit's master branch.
I propose to build an alpha version
been able to come up with a solution. I'll look more into this
in the upcoming days and see how we can improve this.
If I misunderstood your use case, please do let us know.
[1] https://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html
-Jaikiran
not even be valid. I'm going to
build the latest changes of Ant give it a try against a bunch of my
theoretical use cases and see if my suspicions are really valid or not.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/6a41d62cb9ab4e640b72cb4de42a6c211dea645d
-Jaikiran
On 01/07/18 2:57 PM
tml repo link typo to be a
blocker.
I don't know if the copyright year issue should warrant a new vote. If it
doesn't, then it's a +1 for this release from me.
-Jaikiran
On 19/06/18 1:27 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-06-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
there haven't been big chan
hing about files like .gitignore being packaged into the archive. So
I looked into the generated source tar and those are indeed present.
I actually can't think of a reason why we should exclude these files.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/blob/master/build.xml
-Jaikiran
On 19/06/
+1.
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Installed locally, checked the NOTICE and some tasks' manuals. Look fine.
- Built some random existing Ant based projects using this new version.
All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 19/06/18 12:38 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a new release
What purpose is this change serving?
-Jaikiran
On 30/04/18 10:08 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 0add85310 -> f3dfb7779
Inline buildfile names, make search easier
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/repo
Commit: http://
se commits anymore and just stay away from them and stop sending
this frustrated and rude sounding mails.
-Jaikiran
The point is that these names are used exactly once, and need not to be put
in a field which is named inconsistently.
Deviations from this rule of thumb indicate that tests are par
t ways a
certain thing can be implemented. I hope you do realize that what we are
discussing in this thread (and others) is much more broader than finding
copy/paste errors due to usage of one API over other.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsub
has moved to
TIMTOWTDIBSCINABTE?
Sorry, I really don't know what that means or how that relates to what
we are discussing.
-Jaikiran
Gintas
2018-04-30 5:56 GMT+00:00 Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com>:
On 30/04/18 11:12 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
Names of buildfiles used in tests can b
someone else sees any issues, I think we can go
ahead and do the release that you had planned for.
-Jaikiran
On 03/07/18 1:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-07-02, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-07-02, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I just checked the commits related to this and it looks mostly
correct
Thanks Maarten, I'll look this.
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 5:53 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards
incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an
extension of AbstractURLHandler.
I didn't look into it yet
are using
and the exception stacktrace that you got) and attach the proposed patch
there?
-Jaikiran
On 24/01/18 4:57 PM, Adam Retter wrote:
If you previously used the Saxon XSLT Processor within
you would get an error as the XSLT stylesheets
provided with Ant do not work with Saxon, they in fact
I just remembered - we probably have to investigate that image task test
failure on Java 9 and see if its some setup issue or whether that task is
genuinely broken against that runtime. I haven't yet found the time to dig
deeper on that one.
-Jaikiran
On Friday, January 26, 2018, Stefan Bodewig
that it can be used for the basic minimal functionality and then
keep adding anything more that we want in this task in future releases.
More details about this are in the other thread.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/compare/master...jaikir
eedback reports)
For those of you curious to see what the task usage is going to look
like, here's an example[2] build file which shows its many usages. That
file will be cleaned up a bit, before I send a PR for review/merge.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/compare/master...jaikiran:junit5
One minor but important detail - this feature/task will only be
available in the 1.10.x releases (whichever release we decide to include
this in) and won't be available in 1.9.x releases of Ant.
-Jaikiran
On 27/01/18 8:40 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Here's an update on where this effort now
+1.
- Downloaded the .tar.gz and installed locally. Setup ANT_HOME to this
new version.
- Ran some existing projects against this new version
- Checked some documentation in the manual.
Tested the projects using this version of Ant against both Java 8 and
Java 9.
-Jaikiran
On 03/02/18
I think we should use java.specification.version system property instead
which is the recommended one as per the JEP
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223. We use this property in Ant too to
determine the Java version.
-Jaikiran
-
To u
. Checked the presence of source files.
All above tests done on Java 8 setup.
-Jaikiran
On 03/02/18 10:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.10:
git tag: ANT_1_9_10_RC1
on commit: 528c94e
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant
I agree. -1.
On a related note, I don't think we should be doing any of these commits
especially when there's a RC out which we plan to release. IMO, only
blocker issues need to be addressed when the RC is out.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 1:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Generate manifest files
and see if it solves the issue?
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 5:53 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards
incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an
extension of AbstractURLHandler.
I didn't look into it yet
g about github users who
belong to the apache organization.
P.S: There are a few other keywords that the plugin recognizes and is
documented at [1].
[1]
https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/GitHub+pull+request+builder+plugin
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 4:59 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
So it looks like, although I did send a mail about this PR integration a
while back[1], I did not include the details about this plugin which was
used for the integration. Sorry about that.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg46284.html
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 5:12 PM
Maybe the new task is worth highlighting. But other than
that I don't have anything specific.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 11:18 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
as you can witness in
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/site/ant/sources/antnews.xml?r1=1823368=1823367=1823368
I don't really know
Thanks everyone for the inputs. Based on those, I have now updated the
test to not expect a build failure exception and also have updated our
release notes to mention this change in behaviour.
-Jaikiran
On 09/02/18 11:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Jaikiran,
just to avoid duplicate work, I'm
the RC, so that issues like these can hopefully
be caught before we actually do a release.
[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
Sure Stefan.
-Jaikiran
On 09/02/18 11:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Jaikiran,
just to avoid duplicate work, I'm currently running tests on the 1.9.x
branch where I fix a bunch a FileNameMapper implementations that
wouldn't handle null sourceFileNames (which could happen for resources
indeed introduces a different behaviour.
[1]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant/commit/f57b9d5fbca6e9648695bc9d37a27000c0b4aff2#diff-585ed59cf64ef6930e5148094adc322aR21
-Jaikiran
On 13/02/18 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I'm currently reviewing the big change that introduced
I forgot to add that, as you note, as a result of the change, the new
created path will retain all elements from destPath that aren't in
dependClassPath, which is unlike the behaviour before the change.
-Jaikiran
On 14/02/18 9:59 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hi Stefan,
You are right. The change
://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39960
[6]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/OS=xenial,jdk=JDK%201.5%20(latest)/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/copy-test_xml/testResourceWithoutName/
-Jaikiran
Just to be clear, my -1 was meant for both this commit as well as a
subsequent commit where some specific jars have been tagged as JPMS
modules. I think adding this automatic module names just for the sake of
it isn't a good thing.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 9:38 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I agree
amount of bug fixes that have been done since 2.4.0 and I think we
should start looking at what it takes to do the release formalities.
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 12:29 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hi Jan,
My efforts to resolve IVY-1485 have taken longer than I expected,
mainly due to not finding enough
On 06/02/18 10:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-06, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
The PR build on Jenkins is backed by the github PR integration
plugin[1]. One of the features of that plugin is to prevent some
malicious/rogue PR (imagine someone creating a PR with code which does
some odd things
I just realized that the manual that I linked in my mail isn't
accessible to everyone. So here's an alternative link to the same
https://home.apache.org/~jaikiran/temp_workspace/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/18 7:21 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial
n memory, during the report writing
and will be immediately garbage collected once that's done.
Please review the PR - mostly the Ant specific constructs and
implementation details.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Jaikiran/ws/manual/Tasks/jun
the regressions that we have found in our latest releases.
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/18 7:21 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this task.
I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this task
and it can be currently found here[2]. I would
On 17/02/18 12:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this
task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this
task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading
the manual
On 19/02/18 1:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this
task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this
task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading
the manual
that. There are few PRs open, but except
for this one https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/62 I don't plan to
merge the rest given the nature of the changes. There's no release
instructions that I could find, so I am not sure what's going to be
involved in the actual release process.
-Jaikiran
On 19/02/18 9:23 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
On 19/02/18 1:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
We have 3 pre-defined formatters all of which are capable of receiving
this streamed sysout/syserr data. Each of these do _not_ hold on to
this sysout/syserr data in-memory
No specific reason, just that I'm more used to using the javadoc variant
of @deprecated since it allows explaining what's deprecated and why. I
have now added the @Deprecated annotation too and pushed a commit.
-Jaikiran
On 20/12/17 11:08 PM, twogee wrote:
Github user twogee commented
I think moving to Ant 1.8.x would be a better option, given the
relatively low chances of it causing any issues.
-Jaikiran
On 21/06/18 2:47 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-06-21, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
POM template has inconsistent Ant versions, 1.7.1 in compile scope and
1.8.1
I would like to test/import a few more projects (that Nicolas mentioned
in one the mails) locally into the latest upstream version of the IDE,
before starting a release. I have only tested a few so far.
-Jaikiran
On 28/07/18 2:28 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> Thanks, Jaikiran. Would
301 - 400 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
