A couple of issues have been raised with the current RC1 release that is
being voted upon:
- Extra files in the source archive which weren't present in previous
versions
- Mismatch in the version numbers of BCEL and commons-net dependencies
between the libraries.properties and the pom.xml
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 15:48, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
> (They are provided to users as a convenience)
> We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
>
> The vote should be based on whether or not the 'source' - that
> is being
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 16:27, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> > If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17,
>
> This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix
> release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This
On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17,
This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix
release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This release changes
nothing on that front. One of the bug fixes in
Hello Paul,
On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote:
I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional.
I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine.
Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous
releases and they too contain the binary jars in the
If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, shouldn't unit tests
for script-related tasks in Ant core be complemented with an assumption
that Rhino, Nashorn or Graal JS is around?
Gintas
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 10:58, Paul King wrote:
> +0 (non-binding)
>
> I checked:
> * LICENSE &
+0 (non-binding)
I checked:
* LICENSE & NOTICE seem okay
* HASH & SIG seem okay
* I ran against the Groovy test suite which has 100+ ant-related tests and
all continue to pass (using JDK16 and the upcoming Groovy 4)
I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional.
I
+1
Maarten
Op donderdag 30 september 2021 04:58:56 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1
on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision:
I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward.
Anyone have some time this week to test this?
-Jaikiran
On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
noted in
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
> noted in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.12.html. Of
> particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
> task which is necessary for it to
Hi.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 2:28 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> +1
>
> - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
>
Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
(They are provided to users as a convenience)
We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
The vote should be based on whether or
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals
- Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant
- Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1
on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 50166
Maven artifacts:
13 matches
Mail list logo
