On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which parts of AntUnit would you use?
Only the assertions or the tasks and listeners as well?
Currently we are only interested in asserts library.
Which is pretty easy to keep
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
planning to open source when we reach
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:14 AM
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
planning to open
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6
compatible branch.
From this posting I got a reply from Paul King, who explained that
similar asserts are being used in WebTest project and that he would
be interested to learn the outcome of this
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize that
using html email could be a problem. Thanks Stephan for pointing this
out.
My inquiry is in connection with TestLogic project on CodeShare.
Could you please expand a little on TestLogic for the
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize that
using html email could be a problem. Thanks Stephan for pointing this
out.
My inquiry is in connection with TestLogic project on CodeShare.
Could you please expand a little on TestLogic for the rest of the Ant
developers?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My messages to dev@ant.apache.org keep bouncing. I attached the
bounced message at the bottom. Am I using the correct alias?
You are.
Some context for all of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Vladimir asked for an Ant 1.6.5
compatible branch of
On 10/23/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6
compatible branch. The question is more about maintenence, commiting
fixes and enhancements to two branches is a pain.
We may need two branches in any case - one for ant
PROTECTED] My original email bounced with mailbox
full error (unfortunately I lost it).
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:06 PM
To: Vladimir Egorov
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
Hi Vladimir
On Wed, 18
12 matches
Mail list logo
