On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Ok, so you don't like automake and gnu make.
May I gently request that you read this article:
http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/12/advocacy.html?wwwrrr_20001213.txt
I have read that article before, and no I am not on an anti-perl
kick or
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:59:14PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
...
In my last email, I tried to communicate to you that you are
putting words into my mouth. Nobody likes that, especially if
you get it wrong. You have now succeeded in
I think it is goofy to place a src directory in a source tree -- everything
in the distribution is source. If there are too many subdirectories, then
either abstract them into relevant categories or split them into different
library modules.
It isn't a source tree. There is a lot more
Modified:.STATUS
+* apr_create_lock() changes:
...
+ - The fname param is allowed to be NULL on the Unix platform.
feature, not bug... Do you mean that the semantics associated with
this (make up a file for me if you need to, APR) are not implemented
I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
being installed on every box that someone might want to build
apr on.
Feel free to provide an awk script which implements the
equivalent functionality.
Most of you have probably noticed that I have been unusually quiet
recently. I was stuck in Nebraska and without e-mail since Wednesday. I
fully expected to have e-mail that whole time, but my modem doesn't like
me. :-( Anyway, I'm back now, and will be busy getting stuff done again.
Ryan
Sascha is being obtuse, when he should have simply said what he meant. That
would have kept the discussion much cleaner (shame on you, Sascha).
If I say X does not work in context Y, it does not
translate to I don't like X.
What is so unclear in that sentence? Were people
I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
or that the awk's expression mechanism lacks a useful feature
(backreferencing). I've worked around that by using two sub's
in the respective block.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
or that the awk's expression mechanism lacks a useful feature
(backreferencing). I've worked around that by
I dislike this idea. I realize (now) that awk is available on Windows,
but Perl is already required to build Apache on Windows, and all of a
sudden we are going to add the requirement of awk too. Why? We already
require Perl on every platform when building Apache, but we do not
currently
When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
with Apache. With the move to create those files during the build steps,
we now require Perl just to build. I think the best solution is to move
I would love to know what it is. The regex isn't that complex, and
regex's in Perl shouldn't have really changed between 5.005_02 and
5.005_03. Hm
I can repeat the same effect on another machine with Red Hat
5.1 (also 5.005_02).
Are we going to raise the entry barrier for
What makes you think the awk solution is any more portable than the Perl
solution? I would much rather determine what is happening than to just
give up on the Perl solution. Please take a look at the definition of
those functions and make sure they actually match the regex. You could
try
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:28:07AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dislike this idea. I realize (now) that awk is available on Windows,
but Perl is already required to build Apache on Windows, and all of a
sudden we are going to add the requirement of awk too. Why? We already
Hmm. Have you noticed apr_MD5Encode and apr_get_home_directory are in there
twice? Is it possible that you're getting doubles? Maybe you have a backup
copy of apr_uuid.h and apr_md5.h in your include directory, and it's picking
them up?
line was not cleared correctly. Whoops. I used the
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:27:13PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
What makes you think the awk solution is any more portable than the Perl
solution? I would much rather determine what is happening than to just
give up on the Perl solution. Please take a look at the definition of
those
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:55PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:28:07AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
with Apache.
We should document that URL for fetching a Windows-compatible AWK. Are there
binary distributions? I'd also be fine redistributing from apache.org so
that people don't have to hunt this stuff down at other sites.
Three candidates (create exactly the same output):
gawk 3.0.6 for Win32:
Here is another patch that fixes the RUN_SUBDIR_CONFIG_NOW
macro when it is run from the build directory and the
macro gets included into a configure.in from another
project. The problem was the the system did not know
where the helpers dir was.
Index: aclocal.m4
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
being installed on every box that someone might want to build
apr on.
Feel free to provide an awk script
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 03:06:24PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote:
...
How do win32 users run the ./configure script without downloading
Cygwin? Also, have you tried recent versions of Cygwin? The old
install process really sucked, but new versions have a nice
GUI installer that downloads all the
-Original Message-
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 3:56 PM
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: *.exports in distro bundle, use
of , Perl on Windows (was: Re: make_export.awk)]
I'll change, no problem. The
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 1:01 PM
When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
with Apache. With the move to create those
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 5:06 PM
How do win32 users run the ./configure script without downloading
Cygwin? Also, have you tried recent versions of Cygwin? The old
install process really sucked, but new versions have a nice
GUI installer
24 matches
Mail list logo
