[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
On our machine (BS2000) there is a mm.h in /usr/local/include and it is
conflicting with the APR one in srclib/apr/shmem/unix/mm. We need to use
CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include for the configure because the
Folks,
I'm going to propose something radical. Although Jeff's recent commit points
out
a potentially serious problem (discrepancy between the file size and file
offset types)
in the Win32 APR, which I will look at today, this server appears rather
stable, and
buildable, and rbb will have
There are a couple of bugs in the STATUS file that I started hunting
today. Can we shoot for a tarball roll of sometime on Thursday or Friday?
I agree, the no-freeze model just doesn't work in this environment.
Ryan
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
I'm going to
william,
the apache project is, i assume, suffering from the effects of many
developers using cvs at the same time?
if so, can i recommend reading the description of how to ease the pain of
#3 below, described in http://advogato.org/article/247.html
it outlines how to use cvs to do one or more
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we begin a code freeze, excepting _minor_ build and code fixes, until
we have
a stable tarball ready to share? I have win32 folks trying to make
apache2.0a9 build,
this just doesn't make any sense. Once Ryan's patch is in, let's roll,
