Hi,
I just downloaded and installed postgresql, and installed it into a
root. Then I used the apr-util option --with-pgsql. The apr-util
autotools machinary failed. That's because it tries to link a program
against -lpg, but doesn't use the other libs specified in pg_config. So,
I get a link
After pouring over the Darwin sendfile() code and setting up
2 Leopards to do the APR sendfile tests (which *did* result in
the errors popping up), I've committed r656659. The main issue
is that we should *always* return if sendfile returns -1, with EAGAIN
and some data sent; previously that
FYI - I'm not testing darwin darwin, it's just as easy to test darwin
to another OS such as linux or solaris :)
I actually tested both directions, but really we are interested in OS X
as the ./sendfile client. The ./sendfile server could be anything.
Results (on a loopback test) attached.
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:08 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Attached is the patch that fixes the problem, what do you think?
Yeah, we do this kind of thing for other databases already. I'll have a
look at it today.
--
Bojan
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/apr-util-1.x-ldap.patch
is the very first draft of a proposal which begins to break apart the
libldap ( liblber) bindings from the core libaprutil-1 and consuming
applications.
You can see, for reference, an earlier patch in that tree that broke ldap
from
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/apr-util-1.x-ldap.patch
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/httpd-2.x-ldap.patch illustrates how
this translates for such a patched apr-util-1.
As an illustration, here are the results from this change on three example
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
What is interesting is that a patched apr-1.3.x remains binary compatible.
Simply ./configuring --enable-dbd-dso (really should be --enable-dsos) in
combination with --with-ldap will toggle the behavior.
Am I correct in understanding that this brings the LDAP
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:08 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
So,
I get a link error, because it needs to link against -lcrypt.
What kind of system do you have? Where does the -lcrypt live on your
system?
BTW, doing the pg_config --libs will not give us the right thing here.
For instance, on my system,
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:21:46AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:08 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
So,
I get a link error, because it needs to link against -lcrypt.
What kind of system do you have? Where does the -lcrypt live on your
system?
Ubuntu 7.04,
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 23:18 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Ubuntu 7.04, /lib/libcrypt-2.5.so
OK.
OK, perhaps we should just add -lcrypt to the pg line? I could check to
see if this works on my system if you think this is a good idea.
Hmm, not sure if hardcoding here is the right thing to do. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
