(I sent this originally to Joe Orton who suggested I post it to this
list instead):
I've been recently debugging an issue with Solaris, Apache and
EDEADLK. Turning
to Google, I ran across several posts, but found this fairly recent
post:
Folks,
we've found lots of nice small fixes to several platforms, and it would seem
good to release a 1.3.1 bugfix update fairly promptly. Here are some options
[ ] tag it friday (13th)
[ ] tag it next wednesday (18th)
[ ] tag it two weeks from friday (27th)
wondering what folks want, and
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
we've found lots of nice small fixes to several platforms, and it
would seem
good to release a 1.3.1 bugfix update fairly promptly. Here are
some options
[ ] tag it friday (13th)
That way, if people want to, they can
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 12:09 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
we've found lots of nice small fixes to several platforms, and it would seem
good to release a 1.3.1 bugfix update fairly promptly. Here are some options
[X] tag it friday (13th)
[ ] tag it next wednesday (18th)
[ ] tag
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 17:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_TIME, /* APR_DBD_TYPE_TIME, \%pDi */
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_DATE, /* APR_DBD_TYPE_DATE, \%pDd */
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_TIMESTAMP, /* APR_DBD_TYPE_DATETIME, \%pDa */
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bojan
Date: Thu Jun 12 17:11:13 2008
New Revision: 667300
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667300view=rev
Log:
Also make it (ODBC DBD) link :-)
:)
This is looking great, do we feel it's ready for people to try out with
apr 1.3.1?
Bill
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:17 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is looking great, do we feel it's ready for people to try out with
apr 1.3.1?
I have no idea if it actually works (it does compile and link). But hey
- that's how we'll find out :-)
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 17:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_TIME, /* APR_DBD_TYPE_TIME, \%pDi */
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_DATE, /* APR_DBD_TYPE_DATE, \%pDd */
+SQL_C_CHAR, /*SQL_C_TYPE_TIMESTAMP, /*
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:26 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
I have no idea if it actually works (it does compile and link).
It would be good if Windows folks could check this change that I made:
--
#ifdef HAVE_SQL_H
#include sql.h
#include sqlext.h
#elif defined(HAVE_ODBC_SQL_H)
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 20:27 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I would be happy to take the /*'s out if it's confusing.
I already took them out.
Is there a reason not to have /* in a comment? They don't nest in C (but,
curiously - they're
suppose to nest in SQL - although few dbs actually do
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:26 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
It would be good if Windows folks could check this change that I made:
--
#ifdef HAVE_SQL_H
All set on Windows now - r667309
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:14 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
All set on Windows now - r667309
Thanks!
--
Bojan
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:17 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is looking great, do we feel it's ready for people to try out with
apr 1.3.1?
Tom,
Do you have an opinion on this?
PS. I would personally prefer to see ODBC DBC in 1.3.1.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:17 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is looking great, do we feel it's ready for people to try out with
apr 1.3.1?
Tom,
Do you have an opinion on this?
PS. I would personally prefer to see ODBC DBC in 1.3.1.
It's seen considerable use
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:14 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I changed APU_DECLARE_DATA to APU_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA when I checked it into
apr (copying the mysql
driver). Am I missing something?
Sadly, nothing. The whole build thing is busted - even for FreeTDS
driver. I'm fixing now.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:14 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I changed APU_DECLARE_DATA to APU_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA when I checked it into apr (copying the mysql
driver). Am I missing something?
Sadly, nothing. The whole build thing is busted - even for FreeTDS
driver. I'm
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 04:10 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -646,7 +649,7 @@
if (SQL_SUCCEEDED(rc) || rc == SQL_NO_DATA) {
-if (rc = SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO
+if (rc == SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO
( len_indicator == SQL_NO_TOTAL || len_indicator = bufsize)
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 04:10 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -646,7 +649,7 @@
if (SQL_SUCCEEDED(rc) || rc == SQL_NO_DATA) {
-if (rc = SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO
+if (rc == SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO
( len_indicator == SQL_NO_TOTAL ||
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:32 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
The second one doesn't change the behavior, just cleaning up -Wall
warnings, right?
That's right. Thanks for reviewing.
If nobody objects, I'm going to backport ODBC driver to 1.3.x then.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:32 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
The second one doesn't change the behavior, just cleaning up -Wall
warnings, right?
That's right. Thanks for reviewing.
If nobody objects, I'm going to backport ODBC driver to 1.3.x then.
Builds runs OK now on
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 01:14 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
maybe ship it with httpd 2.2.9? Whew!
Nah, you were just (un)lucky to hit the right spot :-)
:) Unfortunately, not in the 2.2.9 package, since they adopted apr 1.3.0,
but anyone will be free to grab on.
I hope we
21 matches
Mail list logo
