On May 30, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 21:39 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
testpoll: |/bin/sh: line 1: 1831 Bus
error ./$prog
Programs failed: testall
make[1]: *** [check] Error 138
make: *** [check] Error 2
What does gdb tell you?
On Saturday 30 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
apr-util's make check fails in testdbm because test/Makefile.in
misses ../dbm/.libs when setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Patches
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:55 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
#0 0x000103a7 in send0_pollset (tc=0xb508, data=0x0) at
testpoll.c:389
If you stop there and have a look at the vars, anything that GDB doesn't
like? Wrong alignment and such?
--
Bojan
On 05/31/2009 01:15 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
FYI - As soon as I see one more committer ack the 1.3 release, I will
move ahead with tagging an 0.9; I just figured it wasn't worth doing
if things were out of sorts.
If anyone wants to address any 'make check' flaw there, first, that
On 05/31/2009 11:07 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 30 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
apr-util's make check fails in testdbm because test/Makefile.in
misses
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 1:08 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Candidates in the usual location, may take up to an hour to sync.
Letting this vote run through midnight Monday morning, my time,
so depending on my weekend I'll
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 03:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[+1] Release apr 1.3.4 as GA
[-1] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
--
$ ./testall -v testdbm
testdbm : |Line 175: expected 0, but saw 20019
FAILED 1 of 2
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed
On May 31, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 03:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[+1] Release apr 1.3.4 as GA
[-1] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
--
$ ./testall -v testdbm
testdbm : |Line 175: expected 0, but saw 20019
FAILED
On May 31, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:55 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
#0 0x000103a7 in send0_pollset (tc=0xb508, data=0x0) at
testpoll.c:389
If you stop there and have a look at the vars, anything that GDB
doesn't
like? Wrong alignment and such?
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/31/2009 01:15 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
FYI - As soon as I see one more committer ack the 1.3 release, I will
move ahead with tagging an 0.9; I just figured it wasn't worth doing
if things were out of sorts.
If anyone wants to address any 'make check' flaw
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 09:15 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
Looks like descs has not been filled in:
(gdb) p descs
$8 = (const apr_pollfd_t *) 0x0
Should that be NULL after the poll?
Maybe you need to step into apr_pollset_poll() on line 384, to see what
happens to descs there. Looks like
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Jeff Trawick wrote:
FWIW, make check has been causing a system panic for me on at least
10.5.5-10.5.7. As Paul mentioned earlier (somewhere), this is
triggered by our kqueue() use (which has no issues AFAICT on FreeBSD).
I don't recall other people reporting
On May 31, 2009 5:11pm, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Jeff Trawick wrote:
FWIW, make check has been causing a system panic for me on at least
10.5.5-10.5.7. As Paul mentioned earlier (somewhere), this is
triggered by our kqueue() use
13 matches
Mail list logo
