Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 23:16 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-ldb* is never added to APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS so that apu-config.in -
apu-1-config can report on whats there using (i.e. from subversion)
Probably the result of moving the DBM (not DBD) to DSO.
right Berkley DB
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 23:16 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-ldb* is never added to APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS so that apu-config.in -
apu-1-config can report on whats there using (i.e. from subversion)
Probably the result of moving the DBM (not DBD)
The question I need answered is
1.3.3/1.3.4:
apu-1-config --libs
-ldb -lgdbm ...
1.3.5/1.3.7:
apu-1-config --libs
...
What is the 'new' appropriate way to determine in 'autotools' that apu
has bdb support by a third party ?
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
The question I need answered is
1.3.3/1.3.4:
apu-1-config --libs
-ldb -lgdbm ...
1.3.5/1.3.7:
apu-1-config --libs
...
What is the 'new' appropriate way to determine in 'autotools' that apu
has bdb support by a third party ?
I've duplicate the situation
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
No I just want SUBVERSION to be able to tell that APR-UTIL was
compiled with ANY BDB support.
If I do 'grep -rl apr_dbm *' in subversion-1.6.2 source, I don't get any
hits. You sure SVN actually uses that?
BTW, have you tried
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
No I just want SUBVERSION to be able to tell that APR-UTIL was
compiled with ANY BDB support.
If I do 'grep -rl apr_dbm *' in subversion-1.6.2 source, I don't get any
hits. You sure SVN actually uses that?
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
No I just want SUBVERSION to be able to tell that APR-UTIL was
compiled with ANY BDB support.
If I do 'grep -rl apr_dbm *' in subversion-1.6.2 source, I don't get any
hits. You sure SVN actually uses that?
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 03:18 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
libsvn_fs_base is compiled if BDB support is detected.
I think it calls Berkeley DB API directly, not via APU. Hence, the fact
that -ldb was part of apu-1-config --libs, was just a historical
accident.
If a program calls apr_dbm*(),
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 03:18 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
libsvn_fs_base is compiled if BDB support is detected.
I think it calls Berkeley DB API directly, not via APU. Hence, the fact
that -ldb was part of apu-1-config --libs, was just a historical
accident.
If a
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 03:35 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Excellent, Bojan, now I've got the history and why, and understand
whats happened. I don't think teaching subversion about this fact
will be sufficient --
There are over 56 apps in the freebsd ports tree with over 900 depends
Bojan Smojver wrote:
PS. Subversion itself depends on Berkeley DB directly, not through APU,
so passing that to ./configure there should be sufficient to build it.
At least it worked for me (although the syntax of the argument itself
can be daunting:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
So, there are apps out there that specifically depend on -ldb being
returned by apu-1-config? Can you give me an example so that I can get
my head around this better?
PS. Subversion itself depends on Berkeley DB directly, not through APU,
so passing that to ./configure
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 17:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
PS. We do have a workaround for ldap along these lines, where we
report ldap in --libs, unless --avoid-ldap is passed to the config
script. Maybe we should do this here, to avoid breaking compilation
compatibility. Opinions?
Quick and
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 18:01 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quick and dirty...
Or to preserve the original order, this one.
--
Bojan
Index: apu-config.in
===
--- apu-config.in (revision 782876)
+++ apu-config.in (working copy)
@@
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Can anyone recreate problems with poll() on any of the branches, using
that patch with 1.3.x? As of a few minutes ago, trunk and 1.4.x will
use poll(), but 1.3.x needs a tweak to
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 17:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
PS. We do have a workaround for ldap along these lines, where we
report ldap in --libs, unless --avoid-ldap is passed to the config
script. Maybe we should do this here, to avoid breaking compilation
compatibility.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:03:16AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
As a packager, I can see how you might view 1.3.4- as a minor version rev,
but from the perspective of any user deploying a package linked against
1.3.4 and migrating to 1.3.7, no packages need to be recompiled. That is
binary
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:03:16AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
As a packager, I can see how you might view 1.3.4- as a minor version rev,
but from the perspective of any user deploying a package linked against
1.3.4 and migrating to 1.3.7, no packages need to be recompiled.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:58:24AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:03:16AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
As a packager, I can see how you might view 1.3.4- as a minor version rev,
but from the perspective of any user deploying a package linked against
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:58:24AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:03:16AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
As a packager, I can see how you might view 1.3.4- as a minor version rev,
but from the perspective of any user deploying a package
While investigating PR47355 for httpd
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335)
I came across an odd thing in apr_procattr_io_set:
if ((out != APR_NO_PIPE) (out != APR_NO_FILE)) {
if ((rv = apr_file_pipe_create_ex(attr-parent_out, attr-child_out,
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
While investigating PR47355 for httpd
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335)
I came across an odd thing in apr_procattr_io_set:
if ((out != APR_NO_PIPE) (out != APR_NO_FILE)) {
if ((rv = apr_file_pipe_create_ex(attr-parent_out,
-ldb* is never added to APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS so that apu-config.in -
apu-1-config
can report on whats there using (i.e. from subversion)
A patch, waiting on upstream decision (T-1 one day before I just drop in
for now)
--
jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Tue Jun 9 15:44:09 2009
New Revision: 783048
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=783048view=rev
Log:
Merge r783046 from 1.3.x (sorry, doing this backwards):
Doesn't doing this wreak havoc on the svn:mergeinfo ?
--
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-ldb* is never added to APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS so that apu-config.in -
apu-1-config
can report on whats there using (i.e. from subversion)
A patch, waiting on upstream decision (T-1 one day before I just
drop in for now)
Foolish question, but for reference is
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 10:58 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You are not missing anything, and solutions are welcomed.
I'm not sure that I'm addressing the right problem here. So, limit
yourself to rocks of no more than 2kg when throwing.
Obviously, there is no guarantee that int's are
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:53 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
also initialise it from apr_initialize()
Eh, which is already the case.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 10:58 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You are not missing anything, and solutions are welcomed.
I'm not sure that I'm addressing the right problem here. So, limit
yourself to rocks of no more than 2kg when throwing.
:)
Obviously, there is no
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:53 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
also initialise it from apr_initialize()
Eh, which is already the case.
In trunk, you mean :)
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:01 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In trunk, you mean :)
You are right. Fooled again by grep (also returns things within
comments :-).
--
Bojan
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:53 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
so we can replace the int's with apr_uint32_t
Just for the record.
--
Bojan
Index: misc/apu_dso.c
===
--- misc/apu_dso.c (revision 783165)
+++ misc/apu_dso.c (working copy)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-ldb* is never added to APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS so that apu-config.in -
apu-1-config
can report on whats there using (i.e. from subversion)
A patch, waiting on upstream decision (T-1 one day before I just
drop in for now)
Foolish
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:13 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Just for the record.
Or, maybe even this. Compiles and passes make check (surprisingly!).
--
Bojan
Index: misc/apu_dso.c
===
--- misc/apu_dso.c (revision 783165)
+++
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:34 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Or, maybe even this. Compiles and passes make check (surprisingly!).
Here is a go-crazy patch. Deals with LDAP, DBD, DBM and DSO init itself.
--
Bojan
Index: ldap/apr_ldap_stub.c
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:19 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Deals with LDAP, DBD, DBM and DSO init itself.
Actually, that LDAP thing is not required.
--
Bojan
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:51 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Actually, that LDAP thing is not required.
So, here are the two patches. One for trunk (for now, until this gets
fixed properly) and one for 1.3.x/1.4.x.
--
Bojan
Index: dbd/apr_dbd.c
36 matches
Mail list logo
