On 2010-10-05 at 11:24, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:33:04 -0500
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
-.5,
On 2010-10-05 at 16:58, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
(Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.)
I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on
the road next
+1
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Regards, Joe
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:17:19PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Let us know if Nick's suggested change satisfies, I've drafted a trunk
which explains
On 06 Oct 2010, at 6:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
I don't really need the status quo explained to me in a README file.
I proposed to fix it, because it is (to me, obviously) broken.
1) The tip of development for the apr-util tree is what is currently
branches/1.5.x. Yes, most of that code also
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[+1] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier, sctemme
S.
--
san...@temme.net
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so
if you just hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck
is that not true for the d...@apr list??
sure, I only need to take care of it, and hit
Am 06.10.2010 21:26, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin,
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme:
Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list,
with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the
list.
ok, since we are 3 now who would like to have it changed, and the rest
seems not to care about, how can we
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier
Here is a stupid idea: why don't we have both? We can
On 07 Oct 2010, at 1:13 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier
Here is a
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:12:28 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme:
Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list,
with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the
list.
ok, since we are 3 now who
Am 06.10.2010 18:20, schrieb Joe Orton:
1) The tip of development for the apr-util tree is what is currently
branches/1.5.x. Yes, most of that code also exists in the apr tree.
apr-util releases and branches do not come from the apr tree, they come
from the apr-util tree.
but here's the whole
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer:
For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To
header is an originator field, and the list is *not* the originator of
the message.
the list *is* the originator since it sends the mail to me, and not you
personally, so this is
15 matches
Mail list logo
