Re: Deadlock with apr_file_open(APR_FOPEN_APPEND) and apr_file_lock() under Windows

2010-10-11 Thread Stefan Ruppert
Brian Havard wrote: On 08/10/10 23:21, Stefan Ruppert wrote: I have filed a bug in bugzilla for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50058 and added a patch which simple removes the calls to apr_file_lock() and apr_file_unlock()! Please can some test this!? As I

Re: apr_file_*() threading issues under Windows!

2010-10-11 Thread Stefan Ruppert
Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Ruppert [mailto:s...@myarm.com] Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2010 17:55 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: apr_file_*() threading issues under Windows! I do not use a file handle from different threads. But if this is not a valid usage

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.10.2010 07:29, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Eric Covener
Seems that our 0.9.18 build is looking in the wrong place.  This is a regression: -1. Has anyone else tested with bundled Expat? I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled, I am seeing when there is no system expat (and configure discovers the bundled expat) it has the extra /lib/

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Eric Covener
I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled, s/bundled/builtin/ -- i didn't have the typo in my actual build

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.10.2010 15:59, Eric Covener wrote: Seems that our 0.9.18 build is looking in the wrong place. This is a regression: -1. Has anyone else tested with bundled Expat? I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled, I am seeing when there is no system expat (and configure discovers the

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Eric Covener
It has in it: where? It is ncluded in the path APRUTIL_LDFLAGS, but those are actually not really used (only for make check and even there it works with the wrong path). My make check fails with the implicit builtin expat, similar to Sander's report (although his really was on link of aprutil

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
OK, big sorry: it breaks when doing the normal in-tree build, but not when doing out of tree. I didn't expect the simpler case to break :( Working on fixing. Regards, Rainer

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.10.2010 18:05, Rainer Jung wrote: OK, big sorry: it breaks when doing the normal in-tree build, but not when doing out of tree. I didn't expect the simpler case to break :( ... and it only seems to break on some platforms, like e.g. Darwin. On Linux and Solaris it builds without

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote: [-1]  Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA traveling this week, but grabbed necessary items for re-roll when I saw this; will await a conclusion and re-TR

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Any chance you can try the following patch to configure: @@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@ expat_include_dir=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib expat_ldflags=-L$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib expat_libs=-lexpat - expat_libtool=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib/libexpat.la +

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote: [-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA traveling this week, but grabbed necessary items for re-roll when I saw this; will await a conclusion

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net  wrote: [-1]  Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA traveling this week,

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Any chance you can try the following patch to configure: Yes, that makes the issue go away. Configure, make, make install and make check all work with that. S. @@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@ expat_include_dir=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/11/2010 12:28 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote: [-1] Release

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.10.2010 19:29, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Any chance you can try the following patch to configure: Yes, that makes the issue go away. Configure, make, make install and make check all work with that. S. @@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Eric Covener
So r1021428 should be fine. Anyone who can test apr-util 0.9.18 plus patch on AIX before Jeff does a reoll? +1 Went back to AIX and ran w/o --with-expat=builtin and got Sander's make failure. Overlayed apu-conf.m4 from 0.9.x HEAD and repeated build and it worked. -- Eric Covener

Re: svn commit: r1021565 - in /apr/apr/branches/0.9.x: ./ build/

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:10 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Tue Oct 12 01:10:23 2010 New Revision: 1021565 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1021565view=rev Log: win32 .mak and .dep files are tracked on this branch Is this soup yet, or do you suggest the manual, wrowe

Re: svn commit: r1021565 - in /apr/apr/branches/0.9.x: ./ build/

2010-10-11 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/11/2010 9:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:10 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Tue Oct 12 01:10:23 2010 New Revision: 1021565 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1021565view=rev Log: win32 .mak and .dep files are tracked on this branch Is this

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.  As there are enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our 0.9.x users, it

[VOTE] Release apr-util-0.9.19 as GA

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
This latest level corrects a build problem on some platforms using the bundled expat. Let's try to wrap up approval of this follow-up to 0.9.18 in 48 hours (httpd 2.0.next needs it for the enclosed security fixes). The only diffs since 0.9.18 are * Windows build files * version * corrected path