Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.6.2-rc3 as APR 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Noel Butler
On 27/01/2023 23:42, Eric Covener wrote: 1.6.2-rc3 is here: https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 [ X ] +1 looks great [ ] -1 something is broken non binding +1 on rc3 build process Rebuilt httpd with included apr option, no errors, apru build succeeds and

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.6.2-rc3 as APR 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 1/27/23 4:53 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1/27/23 2:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> 1.6.2-rc3 is here: >>> >>> https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 >>> [ ] +1 looks great >>> [ ]

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.6.2-rc3 as APR 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 1/27/23 2:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > 1.6.2-rc3 is here: > > > > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > > > For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 > > [ ] +1 looks great > > [ ] -1 something is broken > > > > I'd like to call a

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.6.2-rc3 as APR 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 1/27/23 2:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > 1.6.2-rc3 is here: > > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 > [ ] +1 looks great > [ ] -1 something is broken > > I'd like to call a vote in parallel to the discussion around the > suitability for 1.6.x. > >

Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Eric Covener
> I would be in favor of hearing further opinions on whether backporting this > to APR-UTIL 1.6 complies with our versioning rules. > If it does we should do so and release apr-util 1.6.2 with it. In the spirit of minimizing further delays, I have backported and rolled RC3 so we can bank a vote

[VOTE] release apr-1.6.2-rc3 as APR 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Eric Covener
1.6.2-rc3 is here: https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 [ ] +1 looks great [ ] -1 something is broken I'd like to call a vote in parallel to the discussion around the suitability for 1.6.x. If there is not a passing vote (or is no versioning consensus) in

Minor nag: APU build warnings (RHEL 8 plus Solaris)

2023-01-27 Thread Rainer Jung
During build and test for the 1.6.2-rc2 release vote I noticed the following warnings. None is new, they were already present at least for 1.6.1: Only Solaris xlate/xlate.c:120:38: warning: passing argument 2 of 'iconv' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]

Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 23.01.23 um 19:57 schrieb Eric Covener: 1.6.2-rc2 is here: https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 [ X] +1 looks great! [ ] -1 something is broken I will let the vote run through mid-week and then try to finalize APR and APU on Thursday if I can, else

Minor nag: APR build warnings on Solaris

2023-01-27 Thread Rainer Jung
During build and test for the 1.7.1-rc2 release vote I noticed the following warnings, but only for Solaris 10 Sparc. None is new, they were already present at least for 1.7.0: locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:979:49: warning: 'mutex_proc_pthread_cond_methods' defined but not used

Re: VOTE: Release apr-1.7.1-rc2 as 1.7.1

2023-01-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 20.01.23 um 01:44 schrieb Eric Covener: 1.7.1-rc1 is here: https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of apr-1.7.1 [ X] +1 looks great! [ ] -1 something is broken I will let the vote run through mid-week. +1 to release and thanks a bunch for RMing. Build and tested on

Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2

2023-01-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 1/26/23 3:15 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > On 24/01/2023 22:08, Graham Leggett via dev wrote: > >> On 24 Jan 2023, at 02:02, Noel Butler > > wrote: >>> >>> This is a result of apr-util 1.6 STILL NOT patched for mariadb or mysql 10 >>> plusĀ  >>> >>>