On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 09:58, Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2024, at 08:48, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1917099=rev
> > Log:
> > Add the LDAP test case.
>
> I am getting a failure on Windows about a missing symbol, I am assuming
> the changes
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Is someone opposed if I put an APR 1.7.x release for vote on the beginning
> of next week?
> It would be my first APR release, but I think I should be able to do it
> with the instructions in release.sh (thanks Eric).
> Otherwise I will ask
Hello Rainer,
I have very little knowledge about autoconf stuff. The autoconf part was
suggest by Yann in [1]
Yann: do you have any ideas why it does not work?
Thanks!
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6j6zm4x15ng04y3tws4w0zoc7vhx3fp8
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 16:01, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 at 18:43, Sergey Safarov wrote:
> Hello
> For process monitoring and troubleshooting i prefer have individual name
> for each thread.
> I submitted pull request with added unix implementation of
> apr_thread_setname and apr_thread_getname.
>
> Could you please review this
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 10:58, wrote:
> Author: jailletc36
> Date: Tue Feb 14 07:56:50 2023
> New Revision: 1907634
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907634=rev
> Log:
> Re-order the fields of 'struct apr_bucket_file' to avoid a hole and some
> padding.
>
> Before the patch, pahole
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:06, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote:
>> >
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 12:01, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I have implemented new apr_thread_name_get()/apr_thread_name_set() API in
> branch 'thread-name':
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/thread-name/
>
> Implementation is based on patch in issue 60587 [1]. Currently it supports
>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 03:44, Eric Covener wrote:
> 1.7.1-rc1 is here:
>
> https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> For the release of apr-1.7.1
> [X ] +1 looks great!
> [ ] -1 something is broken
>
> +1 (Windows)
--
Ivan Zhakov
On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 17:21, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> After deep study of the whole ring strict alias issue, I've come to
> the conclusion that
> the -resulting- binary is effectively the same, and my test case was
> swapping the
> apr .so files between builds of httpd 2.4.54 / apr 1.7.0 and
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 19:59, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Hello friends and collaborators,
>
> I'm still rather certain this change is ABI and API contract-breaking
> on the apr-1.7.x branch, which holds the project hostage for providing
> a well-understood security fix on the legacy branch. Such
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 01:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 6:08 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 00:24, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:19 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For the longer version, let me
I have implemented new apr_thread_name_get()/apr_thread_name_set() API in
branch 'thread-name':
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/thread-name/
Implementation is based on patch in issue 60587 [1]. Currently it supports
the posix platform that supports pthread_setname_np and
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:15, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 20:14, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > > > > I think that we could try an alternative approach for that part of
> > > > > the problem. The alternative approach would have the same
> > > > > characteristics as the approach
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 20:14, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> > > > I think that we could try an alternative approach for that part of the
> > > > problem. The alternative approach would have the same characteristics
> > > > as the approach that had been used for PCRE1:
> > > >
> > > > -- Supply PCRE2
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 01:10, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 12:00 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 7:28 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: ivan
> > > Date: Thu Jun 30 17:28:50 2022
> > > New Revision: 1902378
> > >
> > > URL:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 14:21, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:26 PM Ivan Zhakov via dev
> wrote:
> >
> > Suggestions and improvements are welcome.
>
> I don't see any warning left in trunk and 1.8.x, possibly we'd have a
> Windows /Werror build
> > > I think that we could try an alternative approach for that part of the
> > > problem. The alternative approach would have the same characteristics as
> > > the approach that had been used for PCRE1:
> > >
> > > -- Supply PCRE2 with a custom context with malloc and free
> > >
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 14:45, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 1:13 AM wrote:
> >
> > Author: ivan
> > Date: Mon Jun 27 23:13:52 2022
> > New Revision: 1902297
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902297=rev
> > Log:
> > On 'thread-name' branch: Add apr_thread_name_get()
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 00:24, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:19 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > For the longer version, let me first outline a few problems with the
> > current apr_thread_current() API:
> >
> > 1) apr_thread_current_create() leaks the memory
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 14:08, wrote:
>
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Jun 28 11:08:32 2022
> New Revision: 1902312
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902312=rev
> Log:
> apr_socket_sendv: WIN32: Limit the number of WSABUFs allocated for a single
> call.
>
> * network_io/win32/sendrecv.c():
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:40, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:35 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:14, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:08 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:01, wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:14, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:08 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:01, wrote:
> >>
> >> +#ifdef WIN32
> >> +typedef apr_status_t (__stdcall *encdec_fn)(char*, const char*,
> apr_ssize_t, int, apr_size_t*);
> >> +#else
> >>
Hi,
I have some concerns about the apr_thread_current() functionality that is a
part of the APR 1.8.x branch, but is not yet released.
The short version is: I think that the apr_thread_current() API has
multiple problems and that shipping it in 1.8.0 in its current state would
be a mistake. As
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 21:01, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Mon Jun 27 18:01:27 2022
> New Revision: 1902285
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902285=rev
> Log:
> testencode: Follow up to r1902281: Correct call convention for encdec_fn
> (try 2).
>
>
> Modified:
>
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 19:26, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:57 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 17:29, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> PS: now the macos guys have some work
> >> (https://github.com/apache/apr/runs/7004338300?check_suite_focus=true)
> >> :)
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 17:29, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> PS: now the macos guys have some work
> (https://github.com/apache/apr/runs/7004338300?check_suite_focus=true)
> :)
>
Also testreslist fails sometimes on Windows:
https://github.com/apache/apr/runs/7003387964?check_suite_focus=true
[[[
48/77
As far I understand Apache Infra recommends to migrate Continuous
Integration builds from Travis to GitHub Actions.
I've added initial configuration for GitHub Actions for APR project:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/.github/workflows/
GitHub supports Linux, macOS and Windows
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 19:56, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 6:21 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 19:16, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 18:33, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >> >>
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 18:33, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> I'm responding randomly to one of your ci commits, first to say
> thanks, really nice and valuable work!
>
> I have a question too :) Sorry if it's premature, but I'm also
> wondering why we don't see the outputs of the jobs in the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 17:57, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:57 PM wrote:
> >
> > Author: ivan
> > Date: Mon Jun 20 21:57:13 2022
> > New Revision: 1902120
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902120=rev
> >
> []
> > --- apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/test/testfile.c
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote:
> > > > On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > > >
ully not support those calls,
> conditionally, when the function
> doesn't exist on an older version of the OS.
>
> I checked, it's building fine here, did you forget to mention your
> arguments to the cmake
> invocation so we can sort this out? Which MSVC and which Windows SDK?
>
When building using CMake:
C:\PROGRA~1\MIB055~1\2022\PROFES~1\VC\Tools\MSVC\1432~1.313\bin\Hostx64\x64\cl.exe
/nologo -DAPR_APP -DWINNT -IC:\Ivan\SVN\apr\apr-1.8.x\out\build\x64-Debug
-IC:\Ivan\SVN\apr\apr-1.8.x\include
-IC:\Ivan\SVN\apr\apr-1.8.x\include\arch\win32
33 matches
Mail list logo
