On 06/03/2008 03:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Any comments on belows patches? If not I will commit, but don't cry then if it
breaks some platform on trunk. You have been asked before :-).
Some test results from SPARC Solaris (8, 9, 10) with Solaris LDAP SDK.
All test pass except for the
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/03/2008 03:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Any comments on belows patches? If not I will commit, but don't cry
then if it
breaks some platform on trunk. You have been asked before :-).
Looks good to me.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[...]
threadproc/unix/thread.c: In function `apr_thread_once_init':
threadproc/unix/thread.c:306: warning: missing braces around initializer
threadproc/unix/thread.c:306: warning: (near initialization for
`once_init.__pthread_once_pad')
To me this seems to be a bug
On 05/31/2008 12:26 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
Some test results from SPARC Solaris (8, 9, 10) with Solaris LDAP SDK.
This bounced, so I'm forwarding for Philip.
Just a theory, could you try --disable-ipv6 just to see if that's the
issue? Do you have ipv6 support installed? An ipv6 driver?
Can you provide a backtrace of the testsockets failure?
Bill
---BeginMessage---
«â'qK ¬ Ôáºw^¸«wm4×
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This bounced, so I'm forwarding for Philip.
Just a theory, could you try --disable-ipv6 just to see if that's the
issue? Do you have ipv6 support installed? An ipv6 driver?
Can you provide a backtrace of the testsockets failure?
Ok - that didn't work well, and
OK, testing on Sparc Sol8:
SunOS sunsys 5.8 Generic_108528-22 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100
testshm : FAILED 1 of 6
testsockets : FAILED 1 of 7
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
===
testshm
On May 30, 2008, at 6:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
+1 on apr/apu-1.3.0
No tested and/or real regressions on Sol8, OS X 10.5
and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
-win32-src.zip's with .mak files are up and ready to go. I also just
updated the KEYS file in dist/apr/, and /dist/httpd/ for good measure.
That also means if you met me at the ApacheCon EU 08, your
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 20:07 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
and I'm looking for one answer; are we inhibited from shipping the
apr_dbd_xxx-1.dll binary for oracle, pgsql or sqlite3? If so I'll
adjust before uploading any binaries.
PosgreSQL is licensed under a BSD licence, so we are fine
On Sat, 31 May 2008 21:39:11 -0600
Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
I don't know
Better fix?
--
Bojan
Index: include/apr_ring.h
===
--- include/apr_ring.h (revision 662145)
+++ include/apr_ring.h (working copy)
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
* @param link The name of the APR_RING_ENTRY in the element struct
*/
#define
I got a different result from Bojan, trunk still fail on OpenSolaris 2008.05.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/prj/apache.org/apr-trunk/test$ ./testall -v
testatomic : SUCCESS
testdir : SUCCESS
testdso : SUCCESS
testdup : SUCCESS
testenv : SUCCESS
And just a note that we still get these:
-
poll/unix/epoll.c: In function 'apr_pollset_add':
poll/unix/epoll.c:184: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
poll/unix/epoll.c:184: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break
On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:26:27 -0500
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Several failures:
Linux/APR:
testshm : FAILED 1 of 6
Solaris/APR:
testshm : FAILED 1 of 6
testsockets
On May 30, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 17:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[+1] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
Fedora 9,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:26:27 -0500
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIX 5.3 w/ xlc7
1)
testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block
(22): Invalid argument
My shm failure was not fixed by
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3)
testprocmutex is failing under the fcntl mechanism on AIX, with
proc_mutex_fcntl_acquire() returning rv=EACCESS.
AIX docsays EACCESS is returned instead of EAGAIN for fnctl-already-locked:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 10:31:43 +1000
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 17:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[+1] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[+1] Release
On Sat, 31 May 2008 23:49:04 +0100
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixes the fail on Linux, but not on Solaris.
On Solaris, the shmctl at shm.c line 67 returns EINVAL,
meaning we passed it an invalid shared memory identifier.
The code path up to there is (AFAICT) identical to Linux,
with
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 23:49 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
Needs an additional #include unistd.h. Without that, it gives compile
warnings on Linux (access() undeclared) and errors out on solaris
(neither access() nor F_OK declared).
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Nick Kew wrote:
If we just ignore the EINVAL, the test succeeds.
I've committed a patch to trunk in r662114.
Needs syncing with other trunk updates.
The good news is that I've diagnosed the other two failures on solaris:
- the testsockets fail was down to
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 17:36 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
And just a note that we still get these:
-
poll/unix/epoll.c: In function 'apr_pollset_add':
poll/unix/epoll.c:184: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
This patch avoids
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 13:43 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This patch avoids the warning for me. Not sure if it makes any sense at
all...
Actually, there is no need for that (char *) cast.
--
Bojan
Index: include/apr_ring.h
===
---
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
I don't know enough about the APR release criteria to cast a vote
but I thought I'd post test results on
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
DO NOT begin distributing these in any manner whatsoever, please note that
you can seriously mess up any user who installs these
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
FYI - the mirroring is lagging today. If it comes up empty retry
in another 20 minutes or so.
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 17:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[+1] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
Fedora 9, i686/x86_64, RHEL 5 i686/x86_64, APR:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Notes: For APU, one must run 'make' before 'make check', or DBD drivers
won't get built and tests fill fail.
Damn; looks like we have targets to add to all: --- I'm sorry about that.
But I agree that is not a showstopper, and it's still better off than when
we were
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ubuntu 8.04 - 2.6.24-17-generic SMP
+/-1
[+1] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Bojan Smojver
--
Failed Tests
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 21:03 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But I agree that is not a showstopper, and it's still better off than when
we were limited to make install; make test.
Absolutely and nice work.
--
Bojan
31 matches
Mail list logo
