Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk?  It is the trunk for that tree now. Counting up the opinions posted on the list...  [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk  

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: These choices seem skewed to me. apr is apr-util/trunk is a different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk. Conceptually, apr is apr-util trunk whatever we decide. I disagree, in the past, we had two projects, each with an independent trunk

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: These choices seem skewed to me.  apr is apr-util/trunk is a different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk.  Conceptually, apr is apr-util trunk whatever we decide. I

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-07 Thread Henry Jen
2010/10/7 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm: On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: These choices seem skewed to me.  apr is apr-util/trunk is a different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk.  Conceptually, apr is apr-util trunk whatever we decide. I disagree, in the past, we had two

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-07 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/7/2010 5:29 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: We will still need to make releases on apr-util in the v1.x series, and we may need to bump v1.3 to v1.4, etc. For this, we need a properly functional trunk, otherwise those following the standard svn conventions face problems. Yes, and no.

[Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is the trunk for that tree now. Counting up the opinions posted on the list... [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim [ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim [+1] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier, sctemme S. -- san...@temme.net

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 06.10.2010 21:26, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is the trunk for that tree now. Counting up the opinions posted on the list... [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin,

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim [ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier Here is a stupid idea: why don't we have both? We can

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Oct 2010, at 1:13 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim [ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier Here is a