On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
These choices seem skewed to me. apr is apr-util/trunk is a
different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk. Conceptually, apr is
apr-util trunk whatever we decide.
I disagree, in the past, we had two projects, each with an independent
trunk
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
These choices seem skewed to me. apr is apr-util/trunk is a
different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk. Conceptually, apr is
apr-util trunk whatever we decide.
I
2010/10/7 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
These choices seem skewed to me. apr is apr-util/trunk is a
different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk. Conceptually, apr is
apr-util trunk whatever we decide.
I disagree, in the past, we had two
On 10/7/2010 5:29 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
We will still need to make releases on apr-util in the v1.x series, and we
may need to
bump v1.3 to v1.4, etc. For this, we need a properly functional trunk,
otherwise those
following the standard svn conventions face problems.
Yes, and no.
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[+1] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier, sctemme
S.
--
san...@temme.net
Am 06.10.2010 21:26, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin,
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier
Here is a stupid idea: why don't we have both? We can
On 07 Oct 2010, at 1:13 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:26 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
[ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier
Here is a
10 matches
Mail list logo