Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

On 01 Apr 2019, at 20:01, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Candidate tarballs are at the usual location; > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ <https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/> > > For the release of apr-1.7.0 > [ ] +1 looks great! > [ ] -1 something is broken > >

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

-1.7.0   [  ]  +1 looks great!   [  ]  -1 something is broken This vote will conclude April 4th 2pm EDT, for potential announcement Friday. I could use a hand from Netware folk to explain the potential for binary breakage in os locks to end users for our Announcement, not that this ever really worked

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

On 02/04/2019 04:01, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Candidate tarballs are at the usual location; > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-1.7.0 > [ ] +1 looks great! > [ ] -1 something is broken > > This vote will conclude April 4t

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

> On Apr 1, 2019, at 2:01 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Candidate tarballs are at the usual location; > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-1.7.0 > [ ] +1 looks great! +1 for release: macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2. Thx for RMing! Full output of 'make check'

tarball.sha256 file formatting (Was Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?)

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:34 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 07.09.2018 um 18:19 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: > > Please cast your votes on the following release candidate > > found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > > > Release apr-1.6.4 > >[ ] +/-1 > > One niggle: the sha files are not very

[vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

Candidate tarballs are at the usual location; https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of apr-1.7.0 [ ] +1 looks great! [ ] -1 something is broken This vote will conclude April 4th 2pm EDT, for potential announcement Friday. I could use a hand from Netware folk to explain

[Results] [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following release candidate > found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh > is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) > > Release apr-1.6.5 > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:22:32 -0500 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following release candidate > found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh > is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) > > Release apr-1.6.5 > [ ] +/-1 +1 (Debian). It's

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On 09/11/2018 05:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:33 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: testsock: Line 376: Cannot test if connect completes synchronously This one really depends on the time taken by the system to connect localhost non-blocking. If it's immediate (that

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:33 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > testsock: Line 376: Cannot test if connect completes > synchronously This one really depends on the time taken by the system to connect localhost non-blocking. If it's immediate (that happens), the test is not relevant and

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On 09/11/2018 05:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM Dennis Clarke > wrote: The way to answer this question is to rebuild apr 1.6.3 (perhaps 1.6.0) on this specific machine to compare the results and ensure we haven't introduced a

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > I am not sure if we care about a few items below. On Solaris 10 SPARC it > seems to work with a few minor notes. > > TCP isn't corkable ?? > > testsock : Cannot test if connect completes synchronously ?? The way to answer this

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:23 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Release apr-1.6.5 +1, all good on Debian(s) 7/8/9/10. Thanks for RMing Bill.

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On 11/09/2018 07:28, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> Please cast your votes on the following release candidate >> found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh >> is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote. +1 Win x64 via makefile.win

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

  [  ] +/-1 This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote. +1, Ubuntu 18.04, gcc 8.1.0 CJ I am not sure if we care about a few items below. On Solaris 10 SPARC it seems to work with a few minor notes. TCP isn't corkable

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

Le 10/09/2018 à 23:22, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : Please cast your votes on the following release candidate found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) Release apr-1.6.5   [  ] +/-1 This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

.) > > Release apr-1.6.5 > [ ] +/-1 > > This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for > announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote. >

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following release candidate > found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh > is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) > > Release apr-1.6.5 > [+1] +/-1 > Sorry for the delay;

[VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

Please cast your votes on the following release candidate found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) Release apr-1.6.5 [ ] +/-1 This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for announcement Friday in the event

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

Am 07.09.2018 um 18:19 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: Please cast your votes on the following release candidate found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Release apr-1.6.4   [  ] +/-1 This vote will conclude at 1pm EDT Monday 9/10, for announcement Tuesday in the event of a successful vote

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:19 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following release candidate > found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Release apr-1.6.4 > This candidate is withdrawn from consideration for release. The 1.6.5 candidate follows once folks have had 72

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

So I guess I'm a -1 on release due to this. > On Sep 8, 2018, at 5:03 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Correct, r1839769 plus backports are the culprit. Looks like "tm->" must be > replaced by "(*ostime)->" or similar in line 302: > > if ((*ostime)->wMonth < 1 || (*ostime)->wMonth > 12) > > I

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

It builds now. > Op 8 sep. 2018 om 20:10 heeft William A Rowe Jr het > volgende geschreven: > > Agreed, fix applied. > > Steffen, if you like, you can recheck the build against > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/ checkout. > > >> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 4:04 AM

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

Agreed, fix applied. Steffen, if you like, you can recheck the build against https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/ checkout. On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 4:04 AM Rainer Jung wrote: > Correct, r1839769 plus backports are the culprit. Looks like "tm->" must > be replaced by

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

Correct, r1839769 plus backports are the culprit. Looks like "tm->" must be replaced by "(*ostime)->" or similar in line 302: if ((*ostime)->wMonth < 1 || (*ostime)->wMonth > 12) I currently only have access to svn viewvc, so can't apply right now. Regards, Rainer

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

no go: Error C2065 'tm': undeclared identifier apr c:\vc15\win32\httpd-2.4\srclib\apr\time\win32\time.c 302 Error C2223 left of '->wMonth' must point to struct/union apr c:\vc15\win32\httpd-2.4\srclib\apr\time\win32\time.c 302 --- Original message --- Subject: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 rele

[VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

Please cast your votes on the following release candidate found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Release apr-1.6.4 [ ] +/-1 This vote will conclude at 1pm EDT Monday 9/10, for announcement Tuesday in the event of a successful vote.

[Vote] [RESULTS] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Counting sufficient binding +1 votes, more +1 than -1, all three votes pass. I'm moving from /dev/dist/ to /dist/apr now, and will announce 9am Monday morning CDT. Thanks to all who reviewed these packages! Whether your vote is binding or not, it informs our decision to release. On Wed, Oct 18

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 [ X ] +1 looks good All good, reviewed on 3x flavors linux and Windows testing httpd 2.4.29 > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

> On 18 Oct 2017, at 15:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because +1 > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:58 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Release apr-1.6.3 [X] +1 looks good > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 [X] +1 looks good > > Release apr-iconv-1.2.2 [X] +1 looks good Tested on debian(s). Thanks Bill!

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Good to go all three on Windows. Thanks Bill for RM, and the expat notes we can solve. > Op 18 okt. 2017 om 16:58 heeft William A Rowe Jr het > volgende geschreven: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/19/2017 1:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Now, seeing Steffen's problems and what Michal had to go through to get this to build for him, so I'm -1 with apu 1.6.1. Sorry, I meant -0 as I'm not going to stop this from going out. I am still quite unhappy this was done midstream. I'll

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Two additional footnotes... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote y

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Am 18.10.2017 um 16:58 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; Release apr-1.6.3 [XX] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-util-1.6.1 [XX] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

time being I stick with the former xml build, I see no advantage. > Op 18 okt. 2017 om 23:13 heeft Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> het volgende > geschreven: > >> On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate pack

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

I've built and tested on macOS 10.12. All good. +1 (binding) Thx for RMing! > On Oct 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:58:59 -0500 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because All good on Linux. Pending testing on Mac and static review of

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Two additional footnotes... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > > I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 19/10/2017 00:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because These two all good used

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > > I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU > with a precompiled lib and this l

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 11:13 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU > with a precompiled lib and this lib put

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU with a precompiled lib and this lib put where? Looking at both makafile.win and libaprutil.mak I see

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since >

[Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; Release apr-1.6.3 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-util-1.6.1 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-iconv-1.2.2 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >>... >> >> After deeper consideration, this was fundamentally wrong. >> >> For those less familiar with the Win32 build, we failed to

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >>... >> >> After deeper consideration, this was fundamentally wrong. >> >> For those less familiar with the Win32 build, we failed to

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >... > After deeper consideration, this was fundamentally wrong. > > For those less familiar with the Win32 build, we failed to decouple > a "project" called "xml" which was, in fact, our idea of how expat > should

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd2.4.28 as GA)

bexpat to the .dsp does not help, so filled it in > the .vcxproj. > > > > > --- Original message --- > Subject: Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache > httpd2.4.28 as GA) > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > To: APR Developer List <dev@

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd2.4.28 as GA)

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

t;>>> No issues seen with building and running httpd with apr 1.6.3 and >>>>>>> apr-util >>>>>>> 1.6.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday 25/09/2017 at 21:34, Steffen wrote: >

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:15:29 -0500 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I don't believe we can do libxml2 until the release of 1.7.0, the > supporting logic that Nick committed is sitting in trunk/2.0 - It's > not on my agenda today, but after 1.6.1/1.6.3, sure. > Indeed, I realised

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Steffen wrote: > Yes, 1.6.1 for next httpd 2.4.28. > > I want to go now for libxml2 and forget expat. We have already libxml2.dll > in the distro. > > We need also changes in the httpd dsp/mak/dsw/win files ? Answering your question

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

) and apr-util > > (1.6.1-dev)? > > Or the last released 1.6.2/1.6.0 flavors? > > > I'm reviewing here to avoid tagging something that won't build, if you > > had already > > done so for Windows, it would speed things up here. > > > Cheers, > > > Bill > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> > > wrote: > > On Windows it does not build out of the box. > > > Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in > > mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake. > > > Steffen > > > On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > > version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: > > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. > > > [ ] +1: Good to go > > [ ] +0: meh > > [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. > > > Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. > > > NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience. > > > Thx! > > > > > > >

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

t;>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No issues seen with building and running httpd with apr 1.6.3 and >>>>>>>>

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake. Steffen On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing the

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

;>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 25 sep. 2017 om 20:52 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> >>>>>> het >>>>>> volgende geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Steffen, >>>>>

expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

;>>>> were you testing 1.6.x branches of apr (1.6.3-dev) and apr-util >>>>> (1.6.1-dev)? >>>>> Or the last released 1.6.2/1.6.0 flavors? >>>>> >>>>> I'm reviewing here to avoid tagging something that won't build, if you >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

nday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

gt; >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>> On Windows it does not build out of the box. >>> >>> Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in >>> mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak .

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

y 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robins

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

id not checked cmake. > > Steffen > > On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

9/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. An

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

>> On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd >> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

9/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [

[VOTE][RESULT] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. > &g

[VOTE][RESULT] Release APR 1.6.2

t; +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 72 hrs on I count PMC 7 +1, none -1 (advisory, 3 +1, none -1). This vote passes, Nick or I will shift things to the mirrors shortly for announcement Tuesday once they've caught up.

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Jun 9, 2017 08:07, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. +/- votes please

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On Jun 9, 2017 08:09, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote: With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr 1.6.2

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:07:25 -0400 Dennis Clarke wrote: > Mind if I push this over a strict C99 test on a POSIX compliant > system? Please do! Here's hoping that whatever problems you may identify are not regressions or other showstoppers! > ps: yes any reasonable

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 06/11/2017 05:37 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:04:56 -0500 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: We've voted on this package a number of times, it probably does have the votes if we search through these original two vote threads, but just to be clear I'll spin

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

Just FYI remember we will wait 24 hrs after concluding the vote and pushing the releases from dev to release, just to give mirrors time to sync. That shouldn't interfere with progress at httpd. I would appreciate if you would do the announcements of each Tues aftn, right after you or I publish

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > > We've voted on this package a number of times, it probably > > does have the votes if we search through these original two > > vote threads, but just to be clear I'll spin a new thread, and > > we can attempt to unwind

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:04:56 -0500 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > We've voted on this package a number of times, it probably > does have the votes if we search through these original two > vote threads, but just to be clear I'll spin a new thread, and > we can

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:07 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:09 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please [+1]

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

No issues seen Build (the MS dsw/dsp way) en Tested with the APR-1.6.2 release candidate and httpd-2.4.26-dev On Friday 09/06/2017 at 15:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

No issues seen Build (the MS dsw/dsp way) en Tested with the APR-Util 1.6.0 release candidate and httpd-2.4.26-dev --- Original message --- Subject: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2 From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> To: APR Developer List <dev@apr.apache.org> Date: Friday, 0

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 09.06.2017 15:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release a

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On 09.06.2017 15:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 +1 OS X

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On 6/9/2017 6:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 [+1] Release apr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:09:00 -0500): > [+1] Release apr 1.6.2 FWIW: +1 Windows VC14 (CMake) -- Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500): > [x] Release apr-util 1.6.0 FWIW: +1 Windows V14 (CMake) -- Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 longstanding failure in apr_sockaddr_is_wildcard() only On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 >> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

this is a distinct thread for any >> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. >> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. >> >> +/- votes please >> [ ] Release apr-util 1.6.0 > -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 08.06.2017 19:22, Dennis Clarke wrote: > How can I help? The average developer will have access to 32- or 64-bit Intel-architecture Linux variants. A few will bother to test on one of the *BSD flavours. Some of us have laptops running macOS. Windows development environments are widely

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

+1 > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

+1. > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. &

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On 09/06/2017 23:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 +1 Slackware --

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 10/06/2017 08:50, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500 > William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > >> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any >> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. >> Usu

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 6/9/2017 6:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. +/- votes please [+1] Release apr-util 1.6.0

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On Jun 9, 2017 5:50 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:09:00 -0500 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. Thanks!

[VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr 1.6.2

[VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr-util 1.6.0

Re: splitting [VOTE] thread of APR-UTIL 1.6.0

We've voted on this package a number of times, it probably does have the votes if we search through these original two vote threads, but just to be clear I'll spin a new thread, and we can attempt to unwind previously cast vote tallies to call this specific release already baked. On Wed, May 31

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 06/08/2017 10:56 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dennis Clarke >> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/07/2017 08:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 06/08/2017 10:56 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 06/07/2017 08:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I said... checking out and building 'your own tarball' on a conventional system absolutely beats convincing AIX,

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 06/07/2017 08:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> As I said... checking out and building 'your own tarball' on a >> conventional system absolutely beats convincing AIX, Solaris > > By "conventional" I think you

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >