On 06/07/2017 08:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
As I said... checking out and building 'your own tarball' on a
conventional system absolutely beats convincing AIX, Solaris
By "conventional" I think you mean "Linux" or anything with a reasonable
GNU toolchain and we all know that won't happen
FTR this works only where we haven't modified build inputs such as
configure.in - that is true of 1.6.0 -> 1.6.1 -> 1.6.2 ... It should not
have changed, thankfully.
On Jun 7, 2017 18:16, "Nick Kew" wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 19:00 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On
As I said... checking out and building 'your own tarball' on a conventional
system absolutely beats convincing AIX, Solaris etc to support the right
m4, nevermind the whole autoconf toolchain.
I like Nick's suggestion, I presume you can find 'patch' on all archs.
On Jun 7, 2017 18:00, "Dennis
On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 19:00 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 06:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > https://github.com/apache/apr/tree/1.6.x?files=1 is our GitHub mirror of
> > the 1.6 branch.
> >
> > Note you need to run ./buildconf - this requires libtool, autoconf and
> > python.
On 06/07/2017 06:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
https://github.com/apache/apr/tree/1.6.x?files=1 is our GitHub mirror of
the 1.6 branch.
Note you need to run ./buildconf - this requires libtool, autoconf and
python.
python? really? I need python to run buildconf?
uggg ... that is a
https://github.com/apache/apr/tree/1.6.x?files=1 is our GitHub mirror of
the 1.6 branch.
Note you need to run ./buildconf - this requires libtool, autoconf and
python.
On Jun 7, 2017 17:03, "Dennis Clarke" wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 03:28 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 6
On 06/07/2017 03:28 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:16:23 -0500
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
Greg and
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:16:23 -0500
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> > wrote:
> >> Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2,
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
>> at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
> at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1 candidate.
Committed, review on Netware, OS2 and BEOS would still be appreciated,
either
That works for me on Windows.
Thanks.
On 5/31/2017 3:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1 candidate.
It suggests several fixes are needed on 1.7.x branch as well, because
Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1 candidate.
It suggests several fixes are needed on 1.7.x branch as well, because
retrieving the lockmeth should succeed on Netware (and the answer
is always APR_LOCK_DEFAULT,
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:15 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Investigating which commit may have been missed... Update within the hour.
>
> On May 31, 2017 1:44 PM, "Gregg Smith" wrote:
>>
>> Something tells me not everything of timelock got ripped out.
>>
>>
IL-1.6.0. These bring the benefit
>> of a number of updates to our users. Please test and
>> VOTE on releasing these as our best available versions.
>>
>> [-1] Release apr-1.6.1
>> [+1 / 0 / -1] Release apr-util-1.6.0
>>
>
> Something tells me not everything of
On 5/31/2017 8:51 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I've uploaded release candidates APR-1.6.1 alongside
the existing APR-UTIL-1.6.0. These bring the benefit
of a number of updates to our users. Please test and
VOTE on releasing these as our best available versions.
[-1] Release apr-1.6.1
[+1 / 0 / -1
I've uploaded release candidates APR-1.6.1 alongside
the existing APR-UTIL-1.6.0. These bring the benefit
of a number of updates to our users. Please test and
VOTE on releasing these as our best available versions.
[+1 / 0 / -1] Release apr-1.6.1
[+1 / 0 / -1] Release apr-util-1.6.0
Herewith
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> I see you've done the deed. Thanks.
>
> Getting there, apologies for the disruption of branches/1.6.x/
>
> Follow up testing should take a day
s to uint32 msecs
> truncation" issue in r1792620.
>
> From an API perspective, the single timeout argument looks consensual.
> So there may still be some bug(s) somewhere, which we would fix as
> always, but it would unlikely break existing applications since it's
> new
..@rowe-clan.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [-0] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
>>>
>>>
>>> My own vote, I suspect it has enjoyed 2/3 of the scrutiny needed
>>> to be called the "best available release" a
I implementation in 1.6
>>
>> My own vote, I suspect it has enjoyed 2/3 of the scrutiny needed
>> to be called the "best available release" and should be ready to
>> release soon, but not as soon as 1.6.1 tag is needed.
>
> I see you've done the deed. Thanks.
On 05/23/2017 11:42 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 14:22 -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
[-0] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
My own vote, I suspect it has enjoy
On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 14:22 -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> wrote:
> > [-0] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
>
> My own vote, I suspect it has enjoyed 2/3 of the scruti
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> a similar implementation to apr_thread_mutex_timedlock() (which
> seems to work as expected now).
Please read "similar to apr_proc_mutex_timedlock()"...
be some bug(s) somewhere, which we would fix as
always, but it would unlikely break existing applications since it's
new feature, hence my positive vote...
PS: really sorry for the delay and the lack of activity these days, I
had so few spare times...
be the only questionable item remaining, and
> this vote (and an enhancement may be vetoed, AIUI) is very
> distinct from the poll on experimental features.
>
> Please vote, thanks.
>
>
> I was hoping for more responses
In case you're not counting my response on the other thread
On May 19, 2017 2:21 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
[ ] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
This seems to be the only questionable item remaining, and
this vote (and an enhancement may be vetoed, AIUI) is very
distinct from the poll
, in case there *are* viable use cases for it.
I vote -0.9 (but am OK either way)
> On May 19, 2017, at 3:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>
> [ ] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
>
> This seems to be the only questionable item remai
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> [-0] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
My own vote, I suspect it has enjoyed 2/3 of the scrutiny needed
to be called the "best available release" and should be re
[ ] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6
This seems to be the only questionable item remaining, and
this vote (and an enhancement may be vetoed, AIUI) is very
distinct from the poll on experimental features.
Please vote, thanks.
://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
the
vote open until 8:30 PM EDT, roughly 10 hours from now. TIA!
shooting for this afternoon
OK...
+1: OSX 10.10.3 / Xcode 6.3.1
FreeBSD 10.1 x64
CentOS 6 and 7, x64
Thx for RMing!
:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
First, thank you Gregg and Jim for digging up weird crap!
After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the
same direction). Gregg indicated that he may be able
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Thank you to everyone who helped test or discuss concerns with the
release. Voting is now closed, with the release approved.
Binding +1 for release: trawick, jim, covener
Other
)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out
/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance
: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
(same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
move to dev@apr
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
+1 for release. Tested on AIX/PPC32, HPUX/IA64 and Solaris/x64.
HPUX and AIX had non-regression
On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the
On 4/28/2015 1:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the
same direction). Gregg indicated that he may
On 04/27/2015 08:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2015 4:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build
apr tests libdll pass
httpd-2.4.12 build regression
Win Vista, VS 2008 x86, zip, retro build
apr tests libdll pass
httpd-2.4.12 build
On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build
apr tests libdll pass
httpd-2.4.12 build
On 4/27/2015 4:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build
And I see this was then addressed an hour later - still learning nuances of
gmail filtering and threading.
Thanks again, Jeff :)
Bill
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
I am searching and do not see a call for vote on APR until Gregg just
replied.
:)
Bill
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
I am searching and do not see a call for vote on APR until Gregg just
replied.
I am searching and do not see a call for vote on APR until Gregg just
replied.
I'd love to have this done, but doubt it is legit to start a clock on some
other project's post ;-/
Me, myself, am looking forward to reviewing and integrating in the morning
here. Thanks Jeff.
Bill
On Mon, Apr 27
APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
+1 slackware 13.x
Links:
--
[1] http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
[2] http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
[X] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
* Windows 7, VS2012 x64, .zip distro, cmake tested successfully
(apr tests passed, httpd appeared to worked fine)
* Solaris 10 5/08, Sun cc, 32-bit
(apr tests passed)
* Solaris 10 5/08, Sun cc, 64-bit
(apr tests passed, httpd 2.4.8-dev build from 2013 compiled against
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build
apr tests libdll pass
httpd-2.4.12 build regression
Win Vista, VS 2008 x86, zip, retro build
apr tests libdll pass
httpd-2.4.12 build regression
apr-1.lib(rand.obj) : error
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless
/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.4
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
The vote passes.
Binding +1 for release: trawick, jim, gsmith, covener
is disabled, for RHEL 5 also if dso is enabled.
For details see my 1.5.1 vote mail.
- checked httpd builds for 2.2.29 and 2.4.10 against this version
on Solaris 10, SLES 11 and RHEL 6:
- builds succeed
- test suite runs without regressions
Regards,
Rainer
Aren't most of these issues resolved by correctly using pkg-config where it is
available?
In any case, that isn't a showstopper against 1.5.4 IMHO, since these don't
represent regressions AFAIK.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4
From: Rainer Jung
Am 19.09.2014 um 18:37 schrieb wr...@rowe-clan.net:
Aren't most of these issues resolved by correctly using pkg-config where
it is available?
pkg-config doesn't help for
- crypto configure for OpenSSL expected to fail at least on Solaris,
because when linking against the libssl we need
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4
From: Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
Date: 9/19/14 1:13 pm
To: APR Developer List dev@apr.apache.org
Am 19.09.2014 um 18:37 schrieb wr...@rowe-clan.net:
Aren't most of these issues resolved by correctly using
- Original Message - Subject: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4
From: Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
Date: 9/16/14 6:47 pm
To: APR Developer List dev@apr.apache.org
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born
://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.4
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as recent apr and apr-util)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
+1
All tests OK with :
- Debian 6.0.10/squeeze/oldstable :
* Linux-2.6.32-5-amd64,
* gcc-4.3.5-4,
* libssl-0.9.8o-4squeeze14
* libdb5-5.1.29-5
* libexpat1-2.0.1-7+squeeze1
*
On 9/16/2014 4:47 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[+1] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
Built:
VC6 in tree with httpd-2.2.29
VC9 on it's own
Tested:
VC9, no regressions noticed in dll tests.
On 17/09/2014 22:04, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[+1] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA
Ubuntu 14.04 desktop x86_64:
Built in conjunction with apr 1.5.x HEAD
apr-util tests pass other than freetds, which hangs
Hi Jeff,
All good Slackware 13.1 and 14
built with apr 1.5.1 as
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Thanks for testing! Voting is now closed. (But speak up if you fear/know
something.)
Binding
On 16.04.2014 01:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
_http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1_
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[+1] Release APR 1.5.1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/ [3]
http://edjective.org/ [4]
all good on slackware 13.1, 13.37, 14.0, 14.1
(same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Hi Jeff,
in case apr-1.5.0 is already installed testvsn is failing on my system
testvsn : |Line 26: expected 1.5.1
*
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Hi Jeff,
in case apr-1.5.0 is already
1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Somehow we didn't notice that gen_test_char and thus apr_escape.lo and thus
libapr-1.so
://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1*
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
Hi Jeff
(same as apr 1.5.0)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com
[X] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA
Tested successfully:
.tar.bz2, Windows 7, MinGW (32-bit, autoconf-based build)
.zip, Windows 7, MS Visual Studio 2012 (64-bit, cmake+nmake build)
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
http://edjective.org/
as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
http://edjective.org/
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:16:00 +0100
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Summary
===
[...]
- crypto configure for OpenSSL expected to fail at least on Solaris,
because when linking against the libssl we need
the additional flags -ldl -lsocket -lnsl. Currently
there's no
/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
.3
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.3 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless
as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Start screaming now if you're still testing or know of a regression that
needs to be discussed. I'll wait a little longer before initiating
On 13.11.2013 17:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util
://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.3
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[+1] Release apr-util 1.5.3 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary
1.5.3 as GA
Thanks Rainer and everyone else for your test reports and votes.
The vote for APR-util 1.5.3 passes, and voting is now closed. I'll
summarize the voting with the commit to the release directory.
1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[+1] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
Thanks Rainer and everyone else for your test reports and votes.
The vote for APR 1.5.0 passes, and voting is now closed. I'll summarize
the voting with the commit
[X] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
(my testing notes elsewhere in this thread)
the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.3 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell
)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
non-binding +1
://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.3
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.3 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the
ordinary occurs
hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
non-binding +1
testutillib had a unresolved sybols problem, fixed post-tag in r1541697,
not a show stopper IMO since
On 13 Nov 2013, at 6:25 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as
of proposed releases fine, only ran their
test suites (cmake build system)
I'll probably vote +1 to both based just on this testing, unless someone
finds cause for further testing or investigation.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On 13 Nov 2013, at 6:48 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.3
autoconf version: 2.69 (same
1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8/1.5.0 and apr-util
1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.5.3 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of
the ordinary occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing
/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks in advance for testing
201 - 300 of 1267 matches
Mail list logo