RE: largefile support

2001-02-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 8:04 PM any ideas howto workaround this? and any plans on adding largefile support to 2.0? If it's supported I'd like to see it (Win32 does). However, we need to make an executive decision. Does apr

Re: LARGEFILE support macro

2001-01-27 Thread rbb
Sounds good to me. Ryan On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: What is it folks? APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES? I'd like to commit the patch with a 'proper' name Bill ___ Ryan Bloom

Re: LARGEFILE support?

2001-01-24 Thread rbb
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Question, if we enable largefile support for unix, the apr_finfo_t-size, apr_off_t, and so forth all become 64 bit identities? Are we prepared to do so today? Consequences? Win32 absolutely handles 64 bit file sizes/offsets without

Re: LARGEFILE support?

2001-01-24 Thread David Reid
:42 PM Subject: Re: LARGEFILE support? On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Question, if we enable largefile support for unix, the apr_finfo_t-size, apr_off_t, and so forth all become 64 bit identities? Are we prepared to do so today? Consequences? Win32 absolutely

Re: largefile support

2001-01-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Doug MacEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 12:31 PM any ideas howto workaround this? and any plans on adding largefile support to 2.0? If it's supported I'd like to see it (Win32 does). However, we need to make an executive decision. Does apr (ignoring the httpd

Re: largefile support

2001-01-22 Thread rbb
any ideas howto workaround this? and any plans on adding largefile support to 2.0? If it's supported I'd like to see it (Win32 does). However, we need to make an executive decision. Does apr (ignoring the httpd issue for the moment, do we have programs faulting over arithmetic

Re: largefile support

2001-01-21 Thread rbb
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: as some of you may know, perl 5.6.0+ enables largefile support by default. in order for mod_perl+apache to cooperate, the lfs flags must either be stripped when mod_perl is built or apache must be built with these flags, e.g. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

Re: largefile support

2001-01-21 Thread rbb
any ideas howto workaround this? We could simply check the CFLAGS for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 and if it is there, we just disable sendfile for Linux. Actually, this is relatively easy to fix by actually trying to compile sendfile. I'll work up a potential patch, and send it to you. Ryan