Vote passes with 4 binding votes (thanks to all who voted/reviewed)
+1: covener, rpluem, jorton, ylavic
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 8:22 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick votes everyone, I will just give it a couple more
> hours then proceed.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:43 AM
Thanks for the quick votes everyone, I will just give it a couple more
hours then proceed.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:43 AM SteffenAL wrote:
>
> +1 All fine on Windows
>
> Thanks! Eric
>
>
> --- Original message ---
> Subject: [VOTE] apr 1.7.2 and apr-util 1.6.3
> From: Eric Covener
> To:
+1 All fine on Windows
Thanks! Eric
--- Original message ---
Subject: [VOTE] apr 1.7.2 and apr-util 1.6.3
From: Eric Covener
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, 31/01/2023 22:23
I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
level. I would like to call for an
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:23 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
> level. I would like to call for an expedited vote to replace them
> with version bumps. I will proceed once we get 3 binding +1.
>
> I have re-tagged because I think the
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 04:22:56PM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
> level. I would like to call for an expedited vote to replace them
> with version bumps. I will proceed once we get 3 binding +1.
>
> I have re-tagged because I
On 2/1/23 8:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/23 10:22 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
>> level. I would like to call for an expedited vote to replace them
>> with version bumps. I will proceed once we get 3 binding +1.
On 1/31/23 10:22 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
> level. I would like to call for an expedited vote to replace them
> with version bumps. I will proceed once we get 3 binding +1.
>
> I have re-tagged because I think the consensus
> For the release of apr-1.7.2 AND apr-util-1.6.3
> [x] +1 looks great
> [ ] -1 something is broken
+1 for both
