the query.
This should now be fixed in both the trunk and 1.3.x branch.
We really _do_ appreciate your testing and suggestions!
I can confirm that the latest 1.3.x snapshot on linux, for both sqlite3
and postgresql use a 1 based row index. I removed my hack, and things
work great. I'm
that apr_dbd_get_row is 0
based. That is, 0 is the first row returned from the query.
This should now be fixed in both the trunk and 1.3.x branch.
We really _do_ appreciate your testing and suggestions!
I can confirm that the latest 1.3.x snapshot on linux, for both sqlite3
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 10:13 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
OK, I have confirmed 1 bug. If you pass '0' to apr_dbd_get_row, with
postgresql as the driver, the function returns 0, instead of -1 as it
should. My unit tests happen to test the cases that should fail, that's
how I caught this.
Try now. I
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:43:27AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 10:13 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
OK, I have confirmed 1 bug. If you pass '0' to apr_dbd_get_row, with
postgresql as the driver, the function returns 0, instead of -1 as it
should. My unit tests happen to
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 16:29 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Ok, all my unit tests pass on linux and windows. Thanks a million!
You are welcome. Thank you for testing!
--
Bojan
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:58:32AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 09:07 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
I've been using sqlite3 dbd for some time now. I find that the function
apr_dbd_get_row,
.
We really _do_ appreciate your testing and suggestions!
I can confirm that the latest 1.3.x snapshot on linux, for both sqlite3
and postgresql use a 1 based row index. I removed my hack, and things
work great. I'm going to test windows now, could take some time.
(perhaps get results tomorrow
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 20:43 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I would be happy to take care of it as soon as I receive commit access. I'm
a new committer, and
the instructions advised patience - so I expect this usually takes some time
to get processed.
I committed something that _may_ work in
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 09:07 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
I've been using sqlite3 dbd for some time now. I find that the function
apr_dbd_get_row,
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/trunk/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html#gd4cdc5f4e8981b93f5a467a8c8a768f1
is 1 based. That is, 1 is the first
Hi,
I've been using sqlite3 dbd for some time now. I find that the function
apr_dbd_get_row,
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/trunk/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html#gd4cdc5f4e8981b93f5a467a8c8a768f1
is 1 based. That is, 1 is the first row returned from a query. However,
I just started
Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
I've been using sqlite3 dbd for some time now. I find that the function
apr_dbd_get_row,
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/trunk/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html#gd4cdc5f4e8981b93f5a467a8c8a768f1
is 1 based. That is, 1 is the first row returned from a query. However,
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:03 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I think this is a valid bug.
I agree.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:03 -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
I think this is a valid bug.
I agree.
+1 and I concur with Tom's suggestion w.r.t. a preferred row offset 1.
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 18:29 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 and I concur with Tom's suggestion w.r.t. a preferred row offset 1.
Tom, do you want to fix this one or do you want me to do it?
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 18:29 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 and I concur with Tom's suggestion w.r.t. a preferred row offset 1.
Tom, do you want to fix this one or do you want me to do it?
I would be happy to take care of it as soon as I receive commit access.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:17:34AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 18:29 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 and I concur with Tom's suggestion w.r.t. a preferred row offset 1.
Tom, do you want to fix this one or do you want me to do it?
Aren't you worried about how
Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:17:34AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 18:29 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 and I concur with Tom's suggestion w.r.t. a preferred row offset 1.
Tom, do you want to fix this one or do you want me to do it?
Aren't you
Quoting Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aren't you worried about how that will break all the existing programs
out there using this interface?
This is one of those damned if we fix it, damned if we don't things :-)
That being said, this is clearly a bug, as APU's DBD is supposed to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
