Does anyone have an objection to reverting the addition of the new
multi_event_pollset test on the 1.2.x branch? It's testing for
behavior that's never existed for a number of pollset back ends (at
least kqueue, potentially epoll as well), and nobody has jumped up to
make the test pass on those
Quoting Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just committed the column names patch to trunk, and will look at the
bounds checking stuff when I get a chance.
I've forgotten to ask... Any objections to having these two fixes in 1.2.x?
--
Bojan
On 3/14/06, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just committed the column names patch to trunk, and will look at the
bounds checking stuff when I get a chance.
I've forgotten to ask... Any objections to having these two fixes in 1.2.x?
Nope,
Quoting Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Will try to get to it tonight.
Legend! Thanks heaps.
--
Bojan
With an eye to tagging httpd 2.0.x Sunday night late, working backwards
three days for voting here, I'm planning to TR Thursday night, late.
If there are things you would love to see backported, please get them
done now. A few things yet to mop up of course, but mostly cosmetic.
Things look
On 3/14/06, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Will try to get to it tonight.
And it turns out I actually did do it, see r385977 and r385976.
Legend! Thanks heaps.
No problem.
-garrett
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:18 -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
And it turns out I actually did do it, see r385977 and r385976.
Apologies for wasting your time :-(
--
Bojan
On 3/14/06, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:18 -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
And it turns out I actually did do it, see r385977 and r385976.
Apologies for wasting your time :-(
No, I meant I did it tonight, as opposed to forgetting about it and
needing you to
