Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any chance of a backport of this to 1.2.7?
Just another ping...
--
Bojan
Henry Jen wrote:
+ elif test -r $1/include/expat.h; then
+dnl Expat 1.95.* installation (without libtool)
+dnl Solaris
+expat_include_dir=$1/include
+expat_ldflags=-L$1/lib -R$1/lib
+expat_libs=-lexpat
Here's my essential problems with growing this cruft further :(
-L
Henry Jen wrote:
will not have the -R flag in the Makefile.
Your patch is invalid because we need to proxy the whole accumulated
LDFLAGS off to the client who's trying to compile against apr[-util].
Fixing Makefile isn't enough, LDFLAGS must be 'sticky' within the
accumulated
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any chance of a backport of this to 1.2.7?
I'm rolling 5pm UT, and I'm sorry but no cycles and too little understanding
of the dbd API for me to take this on :( Maybe another committer in the next
9 hours can take a peek?
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 03:14 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm rolling 5pm UT, and I'm sorry but no cycles and too little understanding
of the dbd API for me to take this on :( Maybe another committer in the
next
9 hours can take a peek?
No worries.
--
Bojan
Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
-- rather than a huge email
+1 +/-0 -1 Package
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-0.9.12
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
Votes open - vote the packages you care to review.
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any chance of a backport of this to 1.2.7?
Thanks (r392812 AFAICS)!
--
Bojan
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I'm not overly familiar with test specifics in APU, but it would seem
that LIBS doesn't gets set at all, which then causes AC_CHECK_FUNCS to
return false even if the function is actually available. So, the test
is a bit more manual: check for the function inside the library
using
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
-- rather than a huge email
+1 +/-0 -1 Package
[ X] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
[ X] [ ] [ ] apr-util-0.9.12
[ X] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
[ X] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
I've rolled these,
Need feedback, it seems odd that this was redefined, but I don't have quick
access at this moment to verify -why- this is the case.
Comments please? Any issues with the latest patch on trunk, so I can then
backport it to 1.2 and 0.9 for our Visual Studio 2005 users who are victims
of this silly
This patch is just a request for comment, to see if I'm on the right
track here. The thing does compile, but I didn't actually test it.
You will note that I have hardcoded OIDs in several places, because if
we want to pick them up from pg_type.h, the detection code in dbd.m4
will have to
12 matches
Mail list logo
