On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:50:24PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
-- rather than a huge email chain, vote those packages you want to vote
on...
+1 +/-0 -1 Package
[X ] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
[X ] [ ] [ ]
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:50:24PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
-- rather than a huge email chain, vote those packages you want to vote
on...
+1 +/-0 -1 Package
[ ] [0 ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
[ ] [ ] [-1 ]
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:50 -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
There is a bug in apr_dbd_pgsql.c, in function dbd_pgsql_pquery(). Just
before the PQclear() call, there should be:
*nrows = atoi(PQcmdTuples(res));
This applies to both the trunk and 1.2.7.
Without
Relative to 1.2.6 this release has this change in apr_version.h:
-/* #define APR_IS_DEV_VERSION */
+#undef APR_IS_DEV_VERSION
but I don't think that should be a problem. Otherwise +1 for both the
1.2.7 tarballs - thanks for RMing.
joe
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:50 -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
There is a bug in apr_dbd_pgsql.c, in function dbd_pgsql_pquery().
Is this a regression?
Thanks for catching this Bojan!
Bill
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 07:58 -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Is this a regression?
I don't think so, actually. I think it's always been like this (although
not 100% sure on this).
Thanks for catching this Bojan!
Fixed in trunk, r394013 (my first commit - go easy :-). I believe this
should
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 05:16 -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
I'm trying to update the FreeBSD port of apr to use this.
Can the following patch go in? Older FreeBSD versions
like to have apr compiled with no thread support.
I didn't actually compile this, but it looks OK to me.
--
Bojan
Hi,
I am setting up a Windows XP build environment using Microsoft Visual
C++ 2005 Express and Windows(r) Server 2003 SP1 Platform SDK, and have
a few questions about the results because I can't compare them with an
older VC++ setup.
After MS VC++ upgraded the project files, I found that I
