On 29.05.2009 10:08, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Candidates in the usual location, may take up to an hour to sync.
Letting this vote run through midnight Monday morning, my time,
so depending on my weekend I'll either stage-to-mirrors late that
night, or first thing Monday a.m. for
On Friday 29 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
apr-util's make check fails in testdbm because test/Makefile.in
misses ../dbm/.libs when setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Minor glitch on all Solaris variants for apr-util: If not dbd driver was
complied make check fails because the Solaris flavour of bash is picky
regarding
an for loop with an empty list (for i in ; do). The ones on RHEL don't seem to
care. But IMHO nothing that
FYI - As soon as I see one more committer ack the 1.3 release, I will
move ahead with tagging an 0.9; I just figured it wasn't worth doing
if things were out of sorts.
If anyone wants to address any 'make check' flaw there, first, that
would be terrific. I doubt we'll see another 0.9 release
On May 29, 2009, at 1:08 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Candidates in the usual location, may take up to an hour to sync.
Letting this vote run through midnight Monday morning, my time,
so depending on my weekend I'll either stage-to-mirrors late that
night, or first thing Monday a.m. for
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 21:39 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
testpoll: |/bin/sh: line 1: 1831 Bus
error ./$prog
Programs failed: testall
make[1]: *** [check] Error 138
make: *** [check] Error 2
What does gdb tell you?
--
Bojan
