Re: Time for APR 2.0?

files control the project. Any changes that are made to the .dsp files will not be reflected in the MakeLists.txt files. The .dsp files should not be removed or modified by anything but CMake. You came up with the dropping idea; Question for me is: what is the issue with dsw/dsp ? Steffen

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

, 2015 7:19 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for APR 2.0? On 27.08.2015 19:12, Steffen wrote: I said: As far I know... CMake is not designed to generate ... But it can. Further as far I know :), but I can be wrong. CMake is not designed

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

.dsw/.dsp files. The CMakeLists.txt files controls the project. Why can't we have both? cmake and dsw/dsp. btw. We have already in httpd Apache-apr2.dsw Steffen From: William A Rowe Jr Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 4:54 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel To: Gregg Smith Cc: APR

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

be closed. Steffen -Original Message- From: Branko Čibej Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:03 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for APR 2.0? On 27.08.2015 19:59, Steffen wrote: As long as we not loose any mandatory GUI and GUI tools

mod_status Total Accesses with 2.4.20

Using server-status?auto. Now since running with 2.4.20-dev my statistics graphs it shows less Total Accesses. Is it not counting http/1.1 or http/2 in Total Accesses ? Steffen

Re: Supported Windows versions for APR 2.0 (was Re: [PATCH] Optimizeapr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) on Windows)

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

and REBUILD_CHARTABLES enabled httpd.exe with OPENSSL_Applink and SupportedOS Manifest libxml2 2.9.4 lua 5.2.4 expat 2.2.0 On Tuesday 18/04/2017 at 13:37, Steffen wrote: Build Win32 with current httpd-2.4.26-dev, used not nick's files but exported today 1.6.1-dev Used the IDE build (.dsw and dsp

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Build Win32 with current httpd-2.4.26-dev, used not nick's files but exported today 1.6.1-dev Used the IDE build (.dsw and dsp). Building fine. New warnings: locks\win32\proc_mutex.c(170): warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'apr_interval_time_t' to 'DWORD', possible loss of

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

No issues seen Build (the MS dsw/dsp way) en Tested with the APR-Util 1.6.0 release candidate and httpd-2.4.26-dev --- Original message --- Subject: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2 From: William A Rowe Jr To: APR Developer List Date: Friday, 09/06/2017

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

No issues seen Build (the MS dsw/dsp way) en Tested with the APR-1.6.2 release candidate and httpd-2.4.26-dev On Friday 09/06/2017 at 15:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0

Re: Target 1.6.1?

Building and running fine on windows with httpd 2.4.26-dev. > Op 30 mei 2017 om 17:06 heeft Nick Kew het volgende > geschreven: > > It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week. > > I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up > along with apr-util-1.6.0 for

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

> I think I'd rather have apu 1.6.1 now without this (since we need it now) and > we can do this for 1.6.2 which will allow us to get any kinks out (if any) > while not under the gun. What do you think Steffen? > > Also, if we're going in this direction (which I want to) is to just

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd2.4.28 as GA)

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

No issues seen with building and running httpd with apr 1.6.3 and apr-util 1.6.1 On Monday 25/09/2017 at 21:34, Steffen wrote: No, used 1.6.2/1.6.0. Tomorrow (already late here) I can try 1.6.3-dev and 1.6.1-dev. Op 25 sep. 2017 om 20:52 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

No, used 1.6.2/1.6.0. Tomorrow (already late here) I can try 1.6.3-dev and 1.6.1-dev. > Op 25 sep. 2017 om 20:52 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Steffen, > > were you testing 1.6.x branches of apr (1.6.3-dev)

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

I put in under the xml folder. To get libexpat.lib double click the included lib/expat.vcxproj and convert it. Build expat The .dll and lib is created in expat/win32/bin To reduce the size of the libexpat.dll set in properties/linker/debugging/generate debug info to No. For the C99 issue

Warnings in apr 1.6.3 apr-util 1.6.1

Building on Windows get (new) warnings: apr 1.6.3 Win32 and Win64: time\win32\time.c(58): warning C4098: 'SystemTimeToAprExpTime': 'void' function returning a value Only Win32: file_io\win32\seek.c(173): warning C4244: '=': conversion from 'apr_off_t' to 'apr_size_t', possible loss of

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Good to go all three on Windows. Thanks Bill for RM, and the expat notes we can solve. > Op 18 okt. 2017 om 16:58 heeft William A Rowe Jr het > volgende geschreven: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.4 release?

It builds now. > Op 8 sep. 2018 om 20:10 heeft William A Rowe Jr het > volgende geschreven: > > Agreed, fix applied. > > Steffen, if you like, you can recheck the build against > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/ checkout. > > >&g

Current build warnings Win build

Apr 1.6.3 and Apr-Util 1.6.1 Win32 = Apr: \apr\file_io\win32\seek.c(173): warning C4244: '=': conversion from 'apr_off_t' to 'apr_size_t', possible loss of data \apr\time\win32\time.c(58): warning C4098: 'SystemTimeToAprExpTime': 'void' function returning a value Apr-Util:

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

No issue/regession seen sofar on Windows, build and run with httpd 2.4.39 Thanks! Bill for RMing and Gregg for freshing up the Win build env. On 1-4-2019 20:01, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Candidate tarballs are at the usual location; https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ For the release of

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

already solved there. --- Original message --- Subject: Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ? From: Yann Ylavic To: Steffen Cc: APR Developer List Date: Wednesday, 03/04/2019 15:57 On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:30 PM Steffen wrote: Warnings : Thanks Steffen, better with the attached patch applied?

Re: [vote] Release apr-1.7.0 ?

Warnings : Windows 32: atomic64 and encode ones are NEW \apr\atomic\win32\apr_atomic64.c(26): warning C4133: 'function': incompatible types - from 'long *' to 'volatile LONGLONG *' \apr\atomic\win32\apr_atomic64.c(40): warning C4133: 'function': incompatible types - from 'long *' to

Re: apr-2 ... cleanup

that still 600 boxes are used, special in companies. 4. Drop all references to apr-iconv project Unusable for years -0 It works for years. Warm regards, Steffen

Re: Apache Lounge

Use vcxproj/sln generated some time ago. No need to generate every new release or new visual studio. Vcxproj is the Microsoft standard to build, not cmake. And for me easier is the GUI. Have a good day, Steffen > Op 18 jan. 2022 om 10:13 heeft Mario Brandt het volgende > geschreven:

Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2

+1 Windows Steffen > Op 23 jan. 2023 om 19:58 heeft Eric Covener het volgende > geschreven: > > 1.6.2-rc2 is here: > > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 > [x] +1 looks great! > [ ] -1 something is broken > >

Re: VOTE: Release apr-1.7.1-rc2 as 1.7.1

For the release of apr-1.7.1 [x] +1 looks great! [ ] -1 something is broken +1 Windows Steffen

Buildwarnings

Attached APR 1.7.0 APR-UTIL 1.6.1 Win32 92 warnings Win64 183 warnings Steffen

Re: Buildwarnings

Sorry forget to attach On Monday 03/08/2020 at 14:37, Steffen Land wrote: Attached APR 1.7.0 APR-UTIL 1.6.1 Win32 92 warnings Win64 183 warnings Steffen WIN32 APR 1.7.0 APR-UTIL 1.6.1 Warning C6386 apr\time\win32\timestr.c189 Buffer overrun while writing

Re: APR 1.7.1 release?

Please be sure that the following two are included in 1.7.1 : PR 63491 regression in 1.7, see https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=39558 PR 61165 CPU deadlock under load, see https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/issues/2181 Steffen On Friday 10/09/2021 at 00:00, William