Re: Cassandra Meetup in San Francisco Bay Area

2011-01-06 Thread Zhijie Shen
Hello, I just wonder whether there will be some memos or video records for the meetup, so that the ones who are unable to attend the meetup can trace the newest development of Cassandra as well. Regards, Zhijie On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for

[VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Eric Evans
RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals Yo). SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 0.7.0 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. P.S.

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Jools
+1 Although not a binding vote, seems to be playing nicely for me. --Jools On 6 January 2011 17:17, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals Yo). SVN:

Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

2011-01-06 Thread indika kumara
Hi all, I am an Apache committer (Apache Synapse ESB, WS All) and working for an organization that develops open-source products. We are interesting in using the Cassandra in our products. We need multi-tenancy support as well as a pluggable authentication and authorization architecture in the

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

2011-01-06 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, indika kumara ind...@apache.org wrote: *Multi-tenancy* I noticed that you are implementing multi-tenancy [1]. Could you please guess that how long it would take to finish to the remaining work? I would like to contribute to that. However, I am a newbie to

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Brandon Williams
+1, for reals yo. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals Yo). SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 0.7.0

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1 (not binding) On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: +1, for reals yo. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals

Re: [VOTE] 6.9

2011-01-06 Thread Gary Dusbabek
The old thing still starts up. +1. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:51, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: Feels about time for a new 6.x point release; Lots of interesting changes have landed since the last release.  I propose the following for release as 0.6.9. SVN:

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 for reals On Jan 6, 2011 11:14 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals Yo). SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 0.7.0 artifacts:

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

2011-01-06 Thread indika kumara
Thank very much Brandon for your reply. I would like to investigate more on this. I will ask for your suggestions as needed. Thanks, Indika On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, indika kumara ind...@apache.org wrote:

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

2011-01-06 Thread indika kumara
Hi Brandon, I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement? Thanks, Indika Two vague ideas: (1) qualified keyspaces (by the tenet domain) (2) multiple Cassandra storage configurations in a single

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

2011-01-06 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:33 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Brandon, I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement? Thanks, Indika Two vague ideas: (1) qualified

Re: [VOTE] 6.9

2011-01-06 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: Feels about time for a new 6.x point release; Lots of interesting changes have landed since the last release.  I propose the following for release as 0.6.9. SVN:

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

2011-01-06 Thread Ryan King
+1 non-binding -ryan On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for reals On Jan 6, 2011 11:14 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka For Reals Yo). SVN:

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra #663

2011-01-06 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Cassandra/663/changes

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #148

2011-01-06 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Cassandra-0.7/148/changes Changes: [jbellis] merge from 0.6 [jbellis] reduce flush lock contention patch by Kelvin Kakugawa; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-1930 -- [...truncated 1574 lines...] [junit]