Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.10 (Take 4)

2017-01-14 Thread Jeff Jirsa
+1 -- Jeff Jirsa > On Jan 13, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.10. > > sha1: 9c2ab25556fad06a6a4d58f4bb652719a8a1bc27 > Git: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.10 (Take 4)

2017-01-14 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.10. > > sha1: 9c2ab25556fad06a6a4d58f4bb652719a8a1bc27 > Git: > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a= > shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.10-tentative

Re: [VOTE] 3.X branch feature freeze

2017-01-14 Thread Nate McCall
+1 Thanks for bringing this up. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Hi all! > > It seems like we have a general consensus on ending tick-tock at 3.11, and > moving > on to stabilisation-only for 3.11.x series. > > In light of this, I suggest immediate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.10 (Take 4)

2017-01-14 Thread Nate McCall
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.10. > +1 Thanks!

Re: Wrapping up tick-tock

2017-01-14 Thread Benjamin Roth
+1 semver and what anuj says It is commonly known and used, many people know and understand it. Standards for the win! 2017-01-14 19:07 GMT+01:00 Anuj Wadehra : > Hi, > Now that we are rethinking versioning and release frequency, there exists > an opportunity to

Re: Wrapping up tick-tock

2017-01-14 Thread Anuj Wadehra
Hi, Now that we are rethinking versioning and release frequency, there exists an opportunity to make life easier for Cassandra users. How often mailing lists are discussing: "Which Cassandra version is stable for production?"OR"Is x version stable?" Your release version should indicate your