Re: Supporting multiple JDKs

> I also can't remember any reports on regressions in 2.2 bug fix releases specific to 1.7. So what's the actual problem we want to solve here? Discussion for 2.2 came up from the ticket CASSANDRA-14563 , which I think came up from an

Re: UDF

Be careful when pulling in source files from the DataStax Java Driver (or anywhere) to make sure and respect its Apache License, Version 2.0 and keep all Copyright's etc with said files. -Jeremiah > On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:29 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > +1 as well. > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at

Re: UDF

+1 as well. On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:27 AM Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > If this is about inclusion in 4.0, then I support it. > > Technically this is *mostly* just a move+donation of some code from > java-driver to Cassandra. Given how important this seemingly is to the > board and PMC for us

Re: UDF

If this is about inclusion in 4.0, then I support it. Technically this is *mostly* just a move+donation of some code from java-driver to Cassandra. Given how important this seemingly is to the board and PMC for us to not have the dependency on the driver, the sooner it’s gone, the better. I’d

Speakers needed for Apache DC Roadshow

We need your help to make the Apache Washington DC Roadshow on Dec 4th a success. What do we need most? Speakers! We're bringing a unique DC flavor to this event by mixing Open Source Software with talks about Apache projects as well as OSS CyberSecurity, OSS in Government and and OSS Career

Re: UDF

The patch is technically complete - i.e. it works and does its thing. It's not strictly a bug fix but targets trunk. That's why I started the discussion. On 09/11/2018 02:53 PM, Jason Brown wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks for taking on this work. Is this message a heads up that a patch is

Re: Yet another repair solution

Sure thing! Up until now it has been running in an OSGi environment, so among other things I'm working towards both OSGi and a standalone application. It's designed to be tightly coupled with a single instance, where it keeps track of the repair state and performs repair of tables for that node

Re: UDF

Hi Robert, Thanks for taking on this work. Is this message a heads up that a patch is coming/complete, or to spawn a discussion about including this in 4.0? Thanks, -Jason On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Robert Stupp wrote: > In an effort to clean up our hygiene and limit the dependencies

UDF

In an effort to clean up our hygiene and limit the dependencies used by UDFs/UDAs, I think we should refactor the UDF code parts and remove the dependency to the Java Driver in that area without breaking existing UDFs/UDAs. A working prototype is in this branch: