>
>
> Lastly, and to Stephen's previous email, it might be more manageable to
> accept one drivers first and figure all the details/issues/questions that
> are bound to arise before accepting more. It's worth discussing at least.
>
This approach makes complete sense to me: let's sort out how to
As a follow-up, the drivers team at DataStax has just released Java drivers
3.9.0 and 4.6.0. You can read more from the drivers mailing list links
below:
3.9.0:
https://groups.google.com/a/lists.datastax.com/forum/#!msg/java-driver-user/NCqlbiGp62E/nm26BmeRAwAJ
4.6.0:
I agree keeping the source separate is a good idea to start. If we find
some benefit later in merging the two trees, it's easy enough to do so,
it's more of a pain to split things apart.
The build system used plays a big part as well - ant is definitely not
doing us any favors here.
On Tue,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:10 PM Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
> >
> > If we're talking day to day
> > maintenance, so the bulk of the work really, then I feel rather confident
> > saying that you are wrong,
>
> You're confidently responding to something I wasn't trying to say. :) I may
> not have
>
> If we're talking day to day
> maintenance, so the bulk of the work really, then I feel rather confident
> saying that you are wrong,
You're confidently responding to something I wasn't trying to say. :) I may
not have communicated clearly. I was attempting to enumerate:
1. New feature
Sorry for the 2 week no-show! Let's see where we are now on 4.0:
The board can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=355
[LHF]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=355=CASSANDRA=1661=1726=1658
We have 2 tickets that are Low
I want to clarify that my plea here is just that we acknowledge that once we
adopt drivers (especially if all of them), the "project" becomes quite big.
All sane big projects have a minimum of organization, so let's make sure we
have enough organization to make sure we don't make our future lives
Hi Deepak,
thanks for your contribution.
When it comes to cloud services / different providers, that is
something we could tackle with some (simple) "test suite" against all
main clouds, yes. However, from my experience this is not too
critical. It does not differ a lot if you run your cluster
