Thanks!
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 3:41 PM, Josh McKenzie
wrote:
> And I now realize my brain autocompleted the b to Brian. Sorry about that.
> ;)
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:11 PM Joshua McKenzie jmcken...@apache.org
> wrote:
>
> > Sent an invite your
I think I meant #4 __♂️
On 20/11/2020, 21:11, "Blake Eggleston" wrote:
I’d also prefer #3 over #4
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith
wrote:
>
> Well, I expressed a preference for #3 over #4, particularly for the 3.x
series. However at this point, I
I’d also prefer #3 over #4
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith
> wrote:
>
> Well, I expressed a preference for #3 over #4, particularly for the 3.x
> series. However at this point, I think the lack of a clear project decision
> means we can punt it back to you and
Well, I expressed a preference for #3 over #4, particularly for the 3.x series.
However at this point, I think the lack of a clear project decision means we
can punt it back to you and Sylvain to make the final call.
On 20/11/2020, 16:23, "Benjamin Lerer" wrote:
I will try to summarize
I will try to summarize the discussion to clarify the outcome.
Mick is in favor of #4
Summanth is in favor of #4
Sylvain answer was not clear for me. I understood it like I prefer #3 to #4
and I am also fine with #1
Jeff is in favor of #3 and will understand #4
David is in favor #3 (fix bug and
