Re: Welcome Mike Adamson as Cassandra committer

Congrats Mike! On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 at 8:47 PM, Piotr Kołaczkowski wrote: > Congratulations, Mike! Well deserved, working with you has always been a > pleasure! > > > Wiadomość napisana przez Melissa Logan w dniu > 09.12.2023, o godz. 02:35: > >  > > Congratulations, Mike! > > On Fri, Dec 8,

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 8:44 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > +1 > -- > *From:* Josh McKenzie > *Sent:* Thursday, May 25, 2023 5:37:02 PM > *To:* dev > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search > > +1 > > On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 8:33 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > > +1 >

Re: CEP-30: Approximate Nearest Neighbor(ANN) Vector Search via Storage-Attached Indexes

Hi, I have updated the CEP with some details about distributed queries in the *Approach* section. David: > given results have a real ranking, the current 2i logic may yield incorrect results C* internal iterators are all in primary key order. So we need two in-memory top-k filters, one at

Re: Welcome our next PMC Chair Josh McKenzie

Congrats Josh! And thank you Mick! On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 23:42, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > Thank you Mick for all of your hard work in the project including your > time as the PMC chair! > > Thank you too Josh for all that you do - and for the work that you'll do > as chair! > > On Mar 23, 2023, at

Re: Thanks to Nate for his service as PMC Chair

Thank you, Nate! Congrats Mick! On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 02:42, Henrik Ingo wrote: > Thank you Nate for holding the baton for all these years. Even as a > relative newcomer (2+ years already) I wanted to say I do understand and > appreciate your role in carrying the torch to where the project is

Re: Welcome Aleksandr Sorokoumov as Cassandra committer

Congrats Aleks! On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 22:01, J. D. Jordan wrote: > Congratulations! > > On Mar 16, 2022, at 8:43 AM, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >  > Great news! Well deserved! Congrats and thank you for all your support! > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 9:41, Paulo Motta wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] CEP-7: Storage Attached Index

+1 On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 08:15, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > +1 nb. Thanks Caleb, Mike, Jason, and everyone involved with the effort. > > On Feb 17, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Caleb Rackliffe > wrote: > >  > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call a vote to approve CEP-7. > > Proposal: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (third time is the charm)

+1 On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 22:02, Michael Shuler wrote: > +1 > > Kind regards, > Michael > > On 7/22/21 5:40 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > I am proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release. > > > > sha1: 902b4d31772eaa84f05ffdc1e4f4b7a66d5b17e6 > > Git: >

Re: Welcome Caleb Rackliffe as Cassandra committer

Congrats, Caleb!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 (take2)

+1 On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 08:16, Nate McCall wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 6:59 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release. > > > > sha1: 3282f5ecf187ecbb56b8d73ab9a9110c010898b0 > > Git: > > >

Re: Welcome Berenguer Blasi as Cassandra committer

Congrats Berenguer! On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:11, Erick Ramirez wrote: > Congratulations, Berenguer! Thanks for all the work you've done.  > > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 21:10, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > The PMC's members are pleased to announce that Berenguer Blasi has > > accepted the

Re: Welcome Paulo Motta as Cassandra PMC member

Congrats Paulo! On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 00:03, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Congrats! Well done! > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 11:02, J. D. Jordan > wrote: > > > Congrats Paulo! A great addition to the PMC. > > > > > On Feb 9, 2021, at 9:59 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > > > > Congratulations,

Re: Regarding Materialized Views

Hi, > 1. When will MVs be enabled for production use again ? at least 4.x, it will be assessed after CASSANDRA-15921 > 2. Is there any plan to support secondary indexes on materialized views ? unless your index query is

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

to change when > row offsets are added, so my concern is that we may have to support two > versions of a format for a smooth migration. > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:53 AM Jasonstack Zhao Yang < > jasonstack.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

e most primitive implementation of a B-Tree. Fully-occupied prefix > > > > B-Tree > > > > can have similar properties. There's been a lot of research on > B-Trees > > > > and > > > > optimisations in those. Unfortunately,

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Harry donation

+1 nb On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 12:26 Oleksandr Petrov wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:28 PM Blake Eggleston > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > On Sep 16, 2020, at 2:45 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > > > This vote is about officially accepting the Harry donation from Alex > > Petrov > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

Thank you Patrick for hosting Cassandra Contributor Meeting for CEP-7 SAI. The recorded video is available here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-09-01+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 14:34, Jasonstack Zhao Yang wrote: > Thank you, Char

Re: [DISCUSS] Change style guide to recommend use of @Override

+1 On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 02:45, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > +1 > > > On Sep 1, 2020, at 11:27 AM, David Capwell wrote: > > > > Currently our style guide recommends to avoid using @Override and updates > > intellij's code style to exclude it by default; I would like to propose > we > > change this

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

te: > > > > > > > > Meeting scheduled. > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-08-01+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting > > > > > > > > Tuesday September 1st, 11AM PST. I added a basic b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta2

+1 On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 00:28, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:48 AM Brandon Williams > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 9:19 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-beta2 for release. > > > > > > sha1:

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

; > modularization? > > > > > > > > > > > > We probably should have a discussion on the ML or monthly contrib > call > > > > > > about it first to see how aligned the interested contributors are. > > Could > > > > > do > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

>>> SASI's performance, specifically the search in the B+ tree component, >>> depends a lot on the component file's header being available in the >>> pagecache. SASI benefits from (needs) nodes with lots of RAM. Is SAI bound >>> to this same or similar limitation? SAI also benefits from larger

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

> I think the project needs to conclude the discussions that keep being started around the "definition of done" before determining what sufficient quality assurance looks like for this feature. Looking forward to the Test/QA guideline. Thanks for bringing this up. > the CEP process suggest a

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

xings (at any depth) on the roadmap of SAI ? I strongly believe > that those features are the bare minimum to make SAI an interesting > replacement for the native 2nd index as well as SASI. SASI limited support > for those advanced data structures has hindered its wide adoption (among > other iss

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

Mick thanks for your questions. > During the 4.0 beta phase this was intended to be addressed, i.e.> defining more specific QA guidelines for 4.0-rc. This would be an important > step towards QA guidelines for all changes and CEPs post-4.0. Agreed, I think CASSANDRA-15536

[DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

Hi, As per the CEP guideline, I am sending this email to start a discussion about Storage-Attached-Index[1][2] for Apache Cassandra. A team at DataStax has developed a new index implementation, called Storage Attached Index(SAI), based on the advancement made by SASI. SAI improves: * disk usage

Re: Media coordination (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta1)

Blake Eggleston 于 2020年7月21日周二 01:57写道： > Characterizing alternate or conflicting points of view as assuming bad > intentions without justification is both unproductive and unhealthy for the > project. > > > On Jul 20, 2020, at 9:14 AM, Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > > > > This kind of back and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta1 (take2)

+1 (nb) On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 07:01, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > +1(nb) > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 18:13, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > On Jul 17, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-beta1 for release. > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta1

+1 (nb) On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 01:28, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 6:06 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-beta1 for release. > > > > sha1: 5e767711360ecc4bc05a7cd219f0e680bfada004 > > Git: > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of MVs

> I agree with Jeff that there is some stuff to do to address the current MV > issues and I am willing to focus on making them production ready. +1 On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 15:42, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > > "Make the scan faster" > > "Make the scan incremental and automatic" > > "Make it not

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

+1 (nb) On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 23:18, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > +1 (and present?) > > > > On Jun 20, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > > > > Link to doc: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > > > Change since previous

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

+1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 00:04 Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change > > from any previous release. >

Re: but there are still the same only 3 compile errors left on the 1 line code in abstractRow.java

Hi, It's probably just an Eclipse issue that doesn't properly handle lambda. Intellij should work just fine or you can add a type cast "(Function)" for Eclipse... On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 16:32, Nimbus Lin wrote: > To Sir Michael: > > Thank you for your guiding, my steps are: > cd

CASSANDRA-14925 DecimalSerializer.toString() can OOM

Hi, Would like to get some feedback for CASSANDRA-14925. In order to avoid potential OOM attack, we propose to change DecimalSerializer.toString() from `BigDecimal.toPlainString()` to `BigDecimal.toString()` on Trunk. This change should not cause any compatibility issues.. Thanks Zhao Yang